Objective eye-gaze behaviour during face-to-face communication with proficient alaryngeal speakers: a preliminary study

Authors


Paul Evitts, Department of Audiology, Speech–Language Pathology & Deaf Studies, Towson University, 8000 York Road, Towson, MD 21252, USA; e-mail: pevitts@towson.edu

Abstract

Background: There is a large body of research demonstrating the impact of visual information on speaker intelligibility in both normal and disordered speaker populations. However, there is minimal information on which specific visual features listeners find salient during conversational discourse.

Aims: To investigate listeners’ eye-gaze behaviour during face-to-face conversation with normal, laryngeal and proficient alaryngeal speakers.

Methods & Procedures: Sixty participants individually participated in a 10-min conversation with one of four speakers (typical laryngeal, tracheoesophageal, oesophageal, electrolaryngeal; 15 participants randomly assigned to one mode of speech). All speakers were > 85% intelligible and were judged to be ‘proficient’ by two certified speech–language pathologists. Participants were fitted with a head-mounted eye-gaze tracking device (Mobile Eye, ASL) that calculated the region of interest and mean duration of eye-gaze. Self-reported gaze behaviour was also obtained following the conversation using a 10 cm visual analogue scale.

Outcomes & Results: While listening, participants viewed the lower facial region of the oesophageal speaker more than the normal or tracheoesophageal speaker. Results of non-hierarchical cluster analyses showed that while listening, the pattern of eye-gaze was predominantly directed at the lower face of the oesophageal and electrolaryngeal speaker and more evenly dispersed among the background, lower face, and eyes of the normal and tracheoesophageal speakers. Finally, results show a low correlation between self-reported eye-gaze behaviour and objective regions of interest data.

Conclusions & Implications: Overall, results suggest similar eye-gaze behaviour when healthy controls converse with normal and tracheoesophageal speakers and that participants had significantly different eye-gaze patterns when conversing with an oesophageal speaker. Results are discussed in terms of existing eye-gaze data and its potential implications on auditory–visual speech perception.

Ancillary