SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adams, D.C., Gurevitch, J. & Rosenberg, M.S. (1997). Resampling tests for meta-analysis of ecological data. Ecology, 78, 12771283.
  • Aguilar, R. (2005). Effects of forest fragmentation on the reproductive success of native plant species from the Chaco Serrano forest of Central Argentina. PhD Thesis, National University of Córdoba, Córdoba, pp. 1169.
  • Aguilar, R. & Galetto, L. (2004). Effects of forest fragmentation on male and female reproductive success in Cestrum parqui (Solanaceae). Oecologia, 138, 213220.
  • Aizen, M.A. & Feinsinger, P. (1994a). Forest fragmentation, pollination, and plant reproduction in a Chaco dry forest, Argentina. Ecology, 75, 330351.
  • Aizen, M.A. & Feinsinger, P. (1994b). Habitat fragmentation, native insect pollinators, and feral honey bees in argentine ‘‘Chaco Serrano’’. Ecol. Appl., 4, 378392.
  • Aizen, M.A. & Feinsinger, P. (2003). Bees not to be? Responses of insect pollinator faunas and flower pollination to habitat fragmentation. In: Disruptions and Variability: the Dynamics of Climate, Human Disturbance and Ecosystems in the Americas (eds Bradshaw, G.A., Marquet, P.A. & Mooney, H.A.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 111129.
  • Aizen, M.A., Ashworth, L. & Galetto, L. (2002). Reproductive success in fragmented habitats: do compatibility systems and pollination specialization matter? J. Veg. Sci., 13, 885892.
  • Arnqvist, G. & Wooster, D. (1995). Meta-analysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol., 10, 236240.
  • Ashman, T.L., Knight, T.M., Steets, J.A., Amarasekare, P., Burd, M., Campbell, D.R. et al. (2004). Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology, 85, 24082421.
  • Ashworth, L., Aguilar, R., Galetto, L. & Aizen, M.A. (2004). Why do pollination generalist and specialist plant species show similar reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation? J. Ecol., 92, 717719.
  • Bascompte, J., Jordano, P., Melián, C.J. & Olesen, J.M. (2003). The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 93839387.
  • Begg, C.B. (1994). Publication bias. In: The Handbook of Research Synthesis (eds Cooper, H. & Hedges, L.V.). Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY, pp. 399409.
  • Benitez-Malvido, J. (1998). Impact of forest fragmentation on seedling abundance in a tropical rain forest. Conserv. Biol., 12, 380389.
  • Bond, W.J. (1994). Do mutualisms matter? Assessing the impact of pollinator and disperser disruption on plant extinction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 344, 8390.
  • Bronstein, J.L. (1995). The plant pollinator landscape. In: Mosaic Landscapes and Ecological Processes (eds Hansson, L., Fahrig, L. & Merriam, G.). Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 257288.
  • Bruna, E.M. (2003). Are plant populations in fragmented habitats recruitment limited? tests with an Amazonian herb. Ecology, 84, 932947.
  • Burd, M. (1994). Bateman's principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Botanical Review, 60, 83139.
  • Cooper, H. (1998). Synthesizing Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Cunningham, S.A. (2000). Effects of habitat fragmentation on the reproductive ecology of four plant species in mallee woodland. Conserv. Biol., 14, 758768.
  • Dick, C.W. (2001). Genetic rescue of remnant tropical trees by an alien pollinator. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 268, 23912396.
  • Didham, R.K., Ghazoul, J., Stork, N.E. & Davis, A.J. (1996). Insects in fragmented forest: a functional approach. Trends Ecol. Evol., 11, 255260.
  • Donaldson, J., Nanni, I., Zachariades, C. & Kemper, J. (2002). Effects of habitat fragmentation on pollinator diversity and plant reproductive success in renosterveld shrublands of South Africa. Conserv. Biol., 16, 12671276.
  • Fenster, C.B. & Dudash, M.R. (2001). Spatiotemporal variation in the role of hummingbirds as pollinators of Silene virginica. Ecology, 82, 844851.
  • Ghazoul, J. (2005). Pollen and seed dispersal among dispersed plants. Biol. Rev., 80, 413443.
  • Greenland, S. (1987). Quantitative methods in the review of epidemiological literature. Epidemiol. Rev., 9, 130.
  • Gurevitch, J. & Hedges, L.V. (1999). Statistical issues in ecological meta-analyses. Ecology, 80, 11421149.
  • Gurevitch, J. & Hedges, L.V. (2001). Meta-analysis: combining the results of independent experiments. In: Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments, 2nd edn (eds Scheiner, S.M. & Gurevitch, J.). Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp. 378398.
  • Harris, L.F. & Johnson, S.D. (2004). The consequences of habitat fragmentation for plant-pollinator mutualisms. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci., 24, 2943.
  • Hedges, L.V. & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis. Academic Press, New York.
  • Herrera, C.M. (1996). Floral traits and plant adaptation to insect pollinators: a devil's advocate approach. In: Floral Biology: Studies on Floral Evolution in Animal-pollinated Plants (eds Lloyd, D.G. & Barrett, S.C.H.). Chapman & Hall, New York, pp. 6587.
  • Hobbs, R.J. & Yates, C.J. (2003). Impacts of ecosystem fragmentation on plant populations: generalising the idiosyncratic. Aust. J. Bot., 51, 471488.
  • Honnay, O., Jacquemyn, H., Bossuyt, B. & Hermy, M. (2005). Forest fragmentation effects on patch occupancy and population viability of herbaceous plant species. New Phytol., 166, 723736.
  • Hyatt, L.A., Rosenberg, M.S., Howard, T.G., Bole, G., Fang, W., Anastasia, J. et al. (2003). The distance dependence prediction of the Janzen-Connell hypothesis: a meta-analysis. Oikos, 103, 590602.
  • Jennersten, O. (1988). Pollination in Dianthus deltoides (Caryophyllaceae): effects of habitat fragmentation on visitation and seed set. Conserv. Biol., 2, 359366.
  • Johnson, S.D. & Steiner, K.E. (2000). Generalization versus specialization in plant pollination systems. Trends Ecol. Evol., 15, 140143.
  • Jules, E.S. & Rathcke, B.J. (1999). Mechanisms of reduced Trillium recruitment along edges of old-growth forest fragments. Conserv. Biol., 13, 784793.
  • Kearns, C.A., Inouye, D.W. & Waser, N.M. (1998). Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant–pollinator interactions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 29, 83112.
  • Larson, B.M.H. & Barrett, S.C.H. (2000). A comparison of pollen limitation in flowering plants. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 69, 503520.
  • Lennartsson, T. (2002). Extinction thresholds and disrupted plant–pollinator interactions in fragmented plant populations. Ecology, 83, 30603072.
  • Lloyd, D.G. (1992). Self-fertilization and cross-fertilization in plants. 2. The selection of self-fertilization. Int. J. Plant Sci., 153, 370380.
  • Midgley, J.J. & Bond, W.J. (2001). A synthesis of the demography of African acacias. J. Trop. Ecol., 17, 871886.
  • Morris, W.F. (2003). Which mutualists are most essential?: buffering of plant reproduction against the extinction of pollinators. In: The Importance of Species: Perspectives on Expendability and Triage (eds Kareiva, P. & Levin, S.). Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 260280.
  • Murcia, C. (1996). Forest fragmentation and the pollination of neotropical plants. In: Forest Patches in Tropical Landscapes (eds Schelhas, J. & Greenberg, R.). Island Press, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 1936.
  • Mustajarvi, K., Siikamaki, P., Rytkonen, S. & Lammi, A. (2001). Consequences of plant population size and density for plant–pollinator interactions and plant performance. J. Ecol., 89, 8087.
  • Osenberg, C.W., Sarnelle, O. & Cooper, S.D. (1997). Effect size in ecological experiments: the application of biological models in meta-analysis. Am. Nat., 150, 798812.
  • Palmer, A.R. (1999). Detecting publication bias in meta-analyses: a case study of fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Am. Nat., 154, 220233.
  • Quesada, M., Stoner, K.E., Rosas-Guerrero, V., Palacios-Guevara, C. & Lobo, J.A. (2003). Effects of habitat disruption on the activity of nectarivorous bats (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) in a dry tropical forest: implications for the reproductive success of the neotropical tree Ceiba grandifolia. Oecologia, 135, 400406.
  • Quesada, M., Stoner, K.E., Lobo, J.A., Herrerías-Diego, Y., Palacios-Guevara, C., Mungía-Rosas, M.A. et al. (2004). Effects of forest fragmentation on pollinator activity and consequences for plant reproductive success and mating patterns in bat pollinated bombacaceous trees. Biotropica, 36, 131138.
  • Rathcke, B.J. & Jules, E.S. (1993). Habitat fragmentation and plant–pollinator interactions. Curr. Sci., 65, 273277.
  • Raudenbush, S.W. (1994). Random effects models. In: The Handbook of research synthesis (eds Cooper, H. & Hedges, L.V.). Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 301321.
  • Renner, S.S. (1999). Effects of habitat fragmentation of plant-pollinator interactions in the tropics. In: Dynamics of Tropical Communities (eds Newbery, D.M., Prins, H.H.T. & Brown, N.D.). Blackwell Science, London, pp. 339360.
  • Richards, A.J. (1997). Plant Breeding Systems. Chapman & Hall, London.
  • Rosenberg, M.S. (2005). The file-drawer problem revisited: a general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis. Evolution, 59, 464468.
  • Rosenberg, M.S., Adams, D.C. & Gurevitch, J. (2000). MetaWin: Statistical Sofware for Meta-analysis, Version 2.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
  • Rosenthal, R. (1979). The ‘‘file drawer problem’’ and tolerance for null results. Psychol. Bull., 86, 638641.
  • Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic Procedures for Social Research. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
  • Santos, T. & Telleria, J.L. (1997). Vertebrate predation on Holm Oak, Quercus ilex, acorns in a fragmented habitat: effects on seedling recruitment. For. Ecol. Manage, 98, 181187.
  • Steffan-Dewenter, I. & Tscharntke, T. (1999). Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set. Oecologia, 121, 432440.
  • Steffan-Dewenter, I., Munzenberg, U., Burger, C., Thies, C. & Tscharntke, T. (2002). Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology, 83, 14211432.
  • Vázquez, D.P. & Aizen, M.A. (2004). Asymmetric specialization: a pervasive feature of plant–pollinator interactions. Ecology, 85, 24932501.
  • Vázquez, D.P. & Simberloff, D. (2002). Ecological specialization and susceptibility to disturbance: conjectures and refutations. Am. Nat., 159, 606623.
  • Vogler, D.W. & Kalisz, S. (2001). Sex among the flowers: the distribution of plant mating systems. Evolution, 55, 202204.
  • Waser, N.M., Chittka, L., Price, M.V., Williams, N.M. & Ollerton, J. (1996). Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology, 77, 10431060.
  • Wilcock, C. & Neiland, R. (2002). Pollination failure in plants: why it happens and when it matters. Trends Plant Sci., 7, 270.