SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Amarasekare, P. (2003). Competitive coexistence in spatially structured environments: a synthesis. Ecol. Lett., 6, 11091122.
  • Amarasekare, P. (2004). Spatial variation and density-dependent dispersal in competitive coexistence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, Biol. Sci., 271, 14971506.
  • Armstrong, R.A. & McGehee, R. (1980). Competitive exclusion. Am. Nat., 115, 151170.
  • Bartha, S., Meiners, S.J., Pickett, S.T.A. & Cadenasso, M.L. (2003). Plant colonization windows in a mesic old field succession. Appl. Veg. Sci., 6, 205212.
  • Beekey, M.A., McCabe, D.J. & Marsden, J.E. (2004). Zebra mussel colonisation of soft sediments facilitates invertebrate communities. Freshw. Biol., 49, 535545.
  • Bolker, B.M. (2003). Combining endogenous and exogenous spatial variability in analytical population models. Theor. Popul. Biol., 64, 255270.
  • Bolker, B.M. & Pacala, S.W. (1999). Spatial moment equations for plant competition: understanding spatial strategies and the advantages of short dispersal. Am. Nat., 153, 575602.
  • Bruno, J.F., Kennedy, C.W., Rand, T.A. & Grant, M.B. (2004). Landscape-scale patterns of biological invasions in shoreline plant communities. Oikos, 107, 531540.
  • Burke, M.J.W. & Grime, J.P. (1996). An experimental study of plant community invasibility. Ecology, 77, 776790.
  • Byers, J.E. & Noonburg, E.G. (2003). Scale dependent effects of biotic resistance to biological invasion. Ecology, 84, 14281433.
  • Case, T.J. (1990). Invasion resistance arises in strongly interacting species-rich model competition communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 87, 96109614.
  • Castilla, J.C., Lagos, N.A. & Cerda, M. (2004). Marine ecosystem engineering by the alien ascidian Pyura praeputialis on a mid-intertidal rocky shore. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 268, 119130.
  • Chase, J.M. & Leibold, M.A. (2003). Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • Chave, J., Muller-Landau, H.C. & Levin, S.A. (2002). Comparing classical community models: theoretical consequences for patterns of diversity. Am. Nat., 159, 123.
  • Chesson, P. (1994). Multispecies competition in variable environments. Theor. Popul. Biol., 45, 227276.
  • Chesson, P. (2000). General theory of competitive coexistence in spatially-varying environments. Theor. Popul. Biol., 58, 211237.
  • Chesson, P. (2003). Quantifying and testing coexistence mechanisms arising from recruitment fluctuations. Theor. Popul. Biol., 64, 345357.
  • Chesson, P., Donahue, M.J., Melbourne, B.A. & Sears, A.L. (2005). Scale transition theory for understanding mechanisms in metacommunities. In: Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities (ed. Holt, R.D.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 279306.
  • Clavero, M. & Garcia-Berthou, E. (2005). Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinctions. Trends Ecol. Evol., 20, 110.
  • Crain, C.M. & Bertness, M.D. (2006). Ecosystem engineering across environmental gradients: implications for conservation and management. Bioscience, 56, 211218.
  • Crooks, J.A. (2002). Characterizing ecosystem-level consequences of biological invasions: the role of ecosystem engineers. Oikos, 97, 153166.
  • Cuddington, K. & Hastings, A. (2004). Invasive engineers. Ecol. Model., 178, 335347.
  • D'Antonio, C.M. & Vitousek, P.M. (1992). Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass fire cycle, and global change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 23, 6387.
  • Davies, K.F., Chesson, P., Harrison, S., Inouye, B.D., Melbourne, B.A. & Rice, K.J. (2005). Spatial heterogeneity explains the scale dependence of the native-exotic diversity relationship. Ecology, 86, 16021610.
  • Davis, M.A. (2003). Biotic globalization: does competition from introduced species threaten biodiversity? Bioscience, 53, 481489.
  • Davis, M.A., Grime, J.P. & Thompson, K. (2000). Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J. Ecol., 88, 528534.
  • Davis, M.A., Thompson, K. & Grime, J.P. (2005). Invasibility: the local mechanism driving community assembly and species diversity. Ecography, 28, 696704.
  • Drake, J.M. & Lodge, D.M. (2004). Effects of environmental variation on extinction and establishment. Ecol. Lett., 7, 2630.
  • Elton, C.S. (1958). The Ecology of Invasions. Methuen, London, UK.
  • Foster, B.L. & Dickson, T.L. (2004). Grassland diversity and productivity: the interplay of resource availability and propagule pools. Ecology, 85, 15411547.
  • Gurevitch, J. & Padilla, D.K. (2004). Are invasive species a major cause of extinctions? Trends Ecol. Evol., 19, 470474.
  • Gurney, W.S.C. & Lawton, J.H. (1996). The population dynamics of ecosystem engineers. Oikos, 76, 273283.
  • Gurney, W.S.C. & Nisbet, R.M. (1998). Ecological Dynamics. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
  • Haccou, P. & Vatutin, V. (2003). Establishment success and extinction risk in autocorrelated environments. Theor. Popul. Biol., 64, 303314.
  • Harrison, S. (1999). Native and alien species diversity at the local and regional scales in a grazed California grassland. Oecologia, 121, 99106.
  • Hastings, A. (1980). Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space. Theor. Popul. Biol., 18, 363373.
  • Hastings, A., Cuddington, K., Davies, K.F., Dugaw, C.J., Elmendorf, S., Freestone, A. et al. (2005). The spatial spread of invasions: new developments in theory and evidence. Ecol. Lett., 8, 91101.
  • Higgins, S.I., Pickett, S.T.A. & Bond, W.J. (2000). Predicting extinction risks for plants: environmental stochasticity can save declining populations. Trends Ecol. Evol., 15, 516520.
  • Holt, R.D., Grover, J. & Tilman, D. (1994). Simple rules for interspecific dominance in systems with exploitative and apparent competition. Am. Nat., 144, 741771.
  • Holway, D.A., Suarez, A.V. & Case, T.J. (2002). Role of abiotic factors in governing susceptibility to invasion: a test with argentine ants. Ecology, 83, 16101619.
  • Holyoak, M., Leibold, M.A. & Holt, R.D. (2005). Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • Hosono, Y. (1998). The minimal speed of traveling fronts for a diffusive Lotka-Volterra competition model. Bull. Math. Biol., 60, 435448.
  • Hubbell, S.P. (2001). The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Jiang, L. & Morin, P.J. (2004). Productivity gradients cause positive diversity–invasibility relationships in microbial communities. Ecol. Lett., 7, 10471057.
  • Jones, C.G., Lawton, J.H. & Shachak, M. (1994). Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos, 69, 373386.
  • Keitt, T.H., Lewis, M.A. & Holt, R.D. (2001). Allee effects, invasion pinning, and species’ borders. Am. Nat., 157, 203216.
  • Knight, K.S. & Reich, P.B. (2005). Opposite relationships between invasibility and native species richness at patch versus landscape scales. Oikos, 109, 8188.
  • Lande, R. & Orzack, S.H. (1988). Extinction dynamics of age-structured populations in a fluctuating environment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 85, 74187421.
  • Leibold, M.A., Holyoak, M., Mouquet, N., Amarasekare, P., Chase, J.M., Hoopes, M.F. et al. (2004). The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol. Lett., 7, 601613.
  • Levine, J.M. (2000). Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to community pattern. Science, 288, 852854.
  • Levine, J.M. & Rees, M. (2004). Effects of temporal variability on rare plant persistence in annual systems. Am. Nat., 164, 350363.
  • Lonsdale, W.M. (1999). Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology, 80, 15221536.
  • Mack, M.C. & D'Antonio, C.M. (1998). Impacts of biological invasions on disturbance regimes. Trends Ecol. Evol., 13, 195198.
  • Maron, J.L. & Connors, P.G. (1996). A native nitrogen-fixing shrub facilitates weed invasion. Oecologia, 105, 302312.
  • Melbourne, B.A., Sears, A.L., Donahue, M.J. & Chesson, P. (2005). Applying scale transition theory to metacommunities in the field. In: Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities (eds Holyoak, M., Leibold, M.A. & Holt, R.D.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 307330.
  • Miller, T.E., Kneitel, J.M. & Burns, J.H. (2002). Effect of community structure on invasion success and rate. Ecology, 83, 898905.
  • Mouquet, N. & Loreau, M. (2002). Coexistence in metacommunities: the regional similarity hypothesis. Am. Nat., 159, 420426.
  • Mouquet, N., Miller, T.E., Daufresne, T. & Kneitel, J.M. (2006). Consequences of varying regional heterogeneity in source-sink metacommunities. Oikos, 113, 481488.
  • Okubo, A., Maini, P.K., Williamson, M.H. & Murray, J.D. (1989). On the spatial spread of the grey squirrel in Britain. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, Biol. Sci., 238, 113125.
  • Owen, M.R. & Lewis, M.A. (2001). How predation can slow, stop or reverse a prey invasion. Bull. Math. Biol., 63, 655684.
  • Parker, I.M., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W.M., Goodell, K., Wonham, M., Kareiva, P.M. et al. (1999). Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol. Invasions, 1, 319.
  • Pauchard, A. & Shea, K. (2006). Integrating the study of non-native plant invasions across spatial scales. Biol. Invasions, 8, 399413.
  • Roxburgh, S.H., Shea, K. & Wilson, J.B. (2004). The intermediate disturbance hypothesis: patch dynamics and mechanisms of species coexistence. Ecology, 85, 359371.
  • de Ruiter, P.C., Wolters, V. & Moore, J.C. (2005). Dynamic Food Webs: Multispecies Assemblages, Ecosystem Development and Environmental Change. Elsevier, Boston, MA.
  • Sakai, A.K., Allendorf, F.W., Holt, J.S., Lodge, D.M., Molofsky, J., With, K.A. et al. (2001). The population biology of invasive species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 32, 305332.
  • Sanders, N.J., Gotelli, N.J., Heller, N.E. & Gordon, D.M. (2003). Community disassembly by an invasive species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 24742477.
  • Sax, D.F. & Gaines, S.D. (2003). Species diversity: from global decreases to local increases. Trends Ecol. Evol., 18, 561566.
  • Seabloom, E.W., Harpole, W.S., Reichman, O.J. & Tilman, D. (2003). Invasion, competitive dominance, and resource use by exotic and native California grassland species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 1338413389.
  • Seabloom, E.W., Bjornstad, O.N., Bolker, B.M. & Reichman, O.J. (2005). Spatial signature of environmental heterogeneity, dispersal, and competition in successional grasslands. Ecol. Monogr., 75, 199214.
  • Shea, K. & Chesson, P. (2002). Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol., 17, 170176.
  • Shea, K., Roxburgh, S.H. & Rauschert, E.S.J. (2004). Moving from pattern to process: coexistence mechanisms under intermediate disturbance regimes. Ecol. Lett., 7, 491508.
  • Shigesada, N. & Kawasaki, K.B. (1997). Biological Invasions: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Simberloff, D. & Von Holle, B. (1999). Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol. Invasions, 1, 2132.
  • Skellam, J.G. (1951). Random dispersal in theoretical populations. Biometrika, 38, 196218.
  • Snyder, R.E. & Chesson, P. (2004). How the spatial scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental heterogeneity interact to affect coexistence. Am. Nat., 164, 633650.
  • Stachowicz, J.J., Whitlatch, R.B. & Osman, R.W. (1999). Species diversity and invasion resistance in a marine ecosystem. Science, 286, 15771579.
  • Stohlgren, T.J., Binkley, D., Chong, G.W., Kalkhan, M.A., Schell, L.D., Bull, K.A. et al. (1999). Exotic plant species invade hot spots of native plant diversity. Ecol. Monogr., 69, 2546.
  • Tilman, D. (1982). Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Tilman, D. (1994). Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology, 75, 216.
  • Tilman, D. (2004). Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: A stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 1085410861.
  • Turner, M.G. (2005). Landscape ecology: What is the state of the science? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 36, 319344.
  • Van Vuren, D. & Coblentz, B.E. (1987). Some ecological effects of feral sheep on Santa-Cruz Island, California, USA. Biol. Conserv., 41, 253268.
  • Weinberger, H.F., Lewis, M.A. & Li, B.T. (2002). Analysis of linear determinacy for spread in cooperative models. J. Math. Biol., 45, 183218.
  • Wonham, M.J., O'Connor, M. & Harley, C.D.G. (2005). Positive effects of a dominant invader on introduced and native mudflat species. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 289, 109116.
  • Woodward, G. & Hildrew, A.G. (2001). Invasion of a stream food web by a new top predator. J. Anim. Ecol., 70, 273288.
  • Wright, J.P. & Jones, C.G. (2004). Predicting effects of ecosystem engineers on patch-scale species richness from primary productivity. Ecology, 85, 20712081.
  • Wright, J.P., Gurney, W.S.C. & Jones, C.G. (2004). Patch dynamics in a landscape modified by ecosystem engineers. Oikos, 105, 336348.