SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Beaman, R. & Conn, B. (2003). Automated geoparsing and georeferencing of Malesian collection locality data. Telopea, 10, 4352.
  • Bisby, F.A., Ruggiero, M.A., Wilson, K.L., Cachuela-Palacio, M., Kimani, S.W., Roskov, Y.R. et al. (eds) (2005). Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life: 2005 Annual Checklist. Reading, UK (CD-ROM; Species 2000).
  • Butler, D. (2006). Mashups mix data into global service. Nature, 439, 67.
  • Ceballos, G. & Ehrlich, P.R. (2006). Global mammal distributions, biodiversity hotspots, and conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 1937419379.
  • Chapman, A.D. (2005a). Principles of Data Quality, version 1.0. Report for the Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Copenhagen, Denmark. pp. 158.
  • Chapman, A.D. (2005b). Principles and Methods of Data Cleaning – Primary Species and Species-Occurrence Data, version 1.0. Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Copenhagen, Denmark. pp. 172.
  • Chapman, A.D. & Wieczorek, J. (2006). Guide to Best Practices for Georeferencing (eds Arthur D.Chapman & JohnWieczorek). Contributors: J.Wieczorek, R.Guralnick, A.Chapman, C.Frazier, N.Rios, R.Beaman, Q.Guo. Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Copenhagen, Denmark. pp. 180. Available at: http://www.gbif.org/prog/digit/data_quality/BioGeomancerGuide.pdf [accessed on 30 May 2007].
  • Colwell, R.K. (2005). EstimateS: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples, Version 8.0. Available at: http://purl.oclc.org/estimates [accessed on 30 May 2007].
  • Edwards, J.L. (2004). Research and societal benefits of the global biodiversity information facility. BioScience, 54, 485486.
  • Ellison, A.M., Osterweil, L.J., Clarke, L., Haldley, J.L., Wise, A., Boose E. et al. (2006). Analytic webs support the synthesis of ecological data sets. Ecology, 87, 13451358.
  • Faith, D.P. & Walker, P.A. (1996). Environmental diversity: on the best-possible use of surrogate data for assessing the relative biodiversity of sets of areas. Biodivers. Conserv., 5, 399415.
  • Flemons, P., Guralnick, R., Krieger, J., Ranipeta, A. & Neufeld, D. (2007). A Web based GIS Tool for Exploring the World's Biodiversity: The Global Biodiversity Information Facility Mapping and Analysis Portal Application (GBIF MAPA). Ecological Informatics, 2, 4960.
  • Funk, V.A., Richardson, K.S. & Ferrier, S. (2005). Survey-gap analysis in expeditionary research: where do we go from here? Biol. J. Linnaen Soc., 85, 549567.
  • Graham, C.H., Ferrier, S., Huettman, F., Moritz, C. and Peterson, A.T. (2004). New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol., 19, 497503.
  • Guralnick, R.P. & Neufeld, D. (2005). Challenges building online GIS services to support global biodiversity mapping and analysis: lessons from the mountain and plains database and informatics project. Biodivers. Informatics, 2, 5669.
  • Guralnick, R.P. & Van Cleve, J. (2005). Strengths and weaknesses of museum and national survey data sets for predicting regional species richness: comparative and combined approaches. Divers. Distrib., 11, 349359
  • Guralnick, R.P., Wieczorek, J., Hijmans, R.J., Beaman, R. & the Biogeomancer Working Group (2006). Biogeomancer: automated georeferencing to map the world's biodiversity data. PLoS Biol., 4, 19081909.
  • Heywood, V.H. & Watson, R.T. (1995). Global Biodiversity Assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 11152.
  • Hoekstra, J.M., Boucher, T.M., Ricketts, T.H. & Roberts, C. (2005). Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecol. Lett., 8, 329.
  • Janies, D., Hill, A.W., Guralnick, R., Habib, F., Waltari, E. & Wheeler, W.W. (2007). Point of view: genomic analysis and geographic visualization of the spread of avian influenza. Syst. Biol., 56, 321329.
  • Jenkins, M. (2003). Prospects for biodiversity. Science, 302, 11751177.
  • Kallick-Wakker, I. (1994). Science icons: the visualization of scientific truths. Leonardo, 27, 309315.
  • Koning, D., Sarkar, I. & Moritz, T. (2005). TaxonGrab: extracting taxonomic names from text. Biodivers. Informatics, 2, 7982. Available at: http://jbi.nhm.ku.edu/index.php/jbi/article/viewFile/17/9 [accessed on 30 May 2007].
  • Krishtalka, L. & Humphrey, P.S. (2000). Can natural history museums capture the future? Bioscience, 50, 611617.
  • Lane, M. (2006). Information infrastructure for global biological networks. Microbiol. Aust., 27, 2325. Available at: http://www.theasm.com.au/lounge/journals/MA-Mar-pdf[accessedon30May2007].
  • Loreau, M., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Arroyo, M.T.K., Babin, D., Barbault, R., Donoghue, M. et al. (2006). Diversity without representation. Nature, 442, 245246.
  • Meier, R. & Dikow, T. (2004). The significance of specimen databases from taxonomic revisions for estimating and mapping the global species diversity of invertebrates and repatriating reliable and complete specimen data. Conserv. Biol., 18, 478488.
  • Niemel, J. (2000). Biodiversity monitoring for decision-making. Ann. Zool. Fennici, 37, 307317.
  • Petersen, T.P., Meier, R. & Larsen, M.N. (2003). Testing species richness estimation methods using the museum label data on the Danish Asilidae. Biodivers. Conserv., 12, 687701.
  • Peterson, A.T. (2001). Predicting species’ geographic distributions based on ecological niche modeling. Condor, 103, 599605.
  • Pimm, S.L., Russell, G.L., Gittleman, J.L. & Brooks, T.M. (1995). The future of biodiversity. Science, 269, 347350.
  • Ponder, W.F., Carter, G.A., Flemons, P. & Chapman, R.R. (2001). Evaluation of museum collection data for use in biodiversity assessment. Conserv. Biol., 15, 648657.
  • Rahbek, C. & Graves, G.R. (2001). Multiscale assessment of patterns of avian species richness. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 45344539.
  • Rangel, T.F.L.V.B., Diniz-Filho, J.A.F. & Bini, L.M. (2006) Towards an integrated computational tool for spatial analysis in marcoecology and biogeography. Global. Ecol. Biogeogr., 15, 321327.
  • Sala, O.E., Chapin, F.S. III, Armesto, J.J., Berlow, R., Bloomfield, J., Dirzo, R. et al. (2000). Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science, 287, 17701774.
  • Soberón, J. & Peterson, A.T. (2004). Biodiversity informatics: managing and applying primary biodiversity data. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 359, 689698.
  • Soberón, J.M., Llorente, J.B. & Oñate, L. (2000). The use of specimen-label databases for conservation purposes: an example using Mexican Papilionid and Pierid butterflies. Biodivers. Conserv., 9, 14411466.
  • Stein, B.R. & Wieczorek, J. (2004). Mammals of the world: MaNIS as an example of data integration in a distributed network environment. Biodivers. Informatics, 1, 1422.
  • Suarez, A.V. & Tsutsui, N.D. (2004). The value of museum collections for research and society. BioScience, 54, 6674.
  • Wilson, E.O. (1988). The current state of biological diversity. In: Biodiversity (ed. Wilson, E.O.). National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 318.