• Bolker, B. (in press). Ecological Models and Data in R. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
  • Clark, J.S., Mohan, J., Dietze, M. & Ibanez, I. (2003). Coexistence: How to identify trophic trade-offs. Ecology, 84, 1731.
  • Edwards, A.W.F. (1992). Likelihood: Expanded Edition. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
  • Enquist, B.J., West, G.B., Charnov, E.L. & Brown, J.H. (1999). Allometric scaling of production and life-history variation in vascular plants. Nature, 401, 907911.
  • Enquist, B.J., West, G.B. & Brown, J.H. (2000). Quarter-power allometric scaling in vascular plants: functional basis and ecological consequences. In: Scaling in Biology (eds Brown, J.H. & West, G.B.). Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 167198.
  • Hilborn, R. & Mangel, M. (1997). The Ecological Detective. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
  • King, D.A., Davies, S.J., Nur Supardi, M.N. & Tan, S. (2005). Tree growth is related to light interception and wood density in two mixed dipterocarp forests of Malaysia. Func. Ecol., 19, 445453.
  • Russo, S.E., Wiser, S.K. & Coomes, D.A. (2007). Growth–size scaling relationships of woody plant species differ from predictions of the Metabolic Ecology Model. Ecol. Lett., 10, 889901.
  • Weiner, J. & Thomas, S.C. (2001). The nature of tree growth and the ‘age-related decline in forest productivity’. Oikos, 94, 374376.