You have free access to this content

(Russo et al. 2007): A re-analysis of growth–size scaling relationships of woody plant species

  1. Sabrina E. Russo1,2,4,
  2. Susan K. Wiser3,
  3. David A. Coomes1,3

Article first published online: 31 JAN 2008

DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01156.x

Issue

Ecology Letters

Ecology Letters

Volume 11, Issue 3, pages 311–312, March 2008

Additional Information

How to Cite

Russo, S. E., Wiser, S. K. and Coomes, D. A. (2008), (Russo et al. 2007): A re-analysis of growth–size scaling relationships of woody plant species. Ecology Letters, 11: 311–312. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01156.x

Author Information

  1. 1

    Conservation and Community Ecology Group, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EA, UK

  2. 2

    School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588-0118, USA

  3. 3

    Landcare Research, PO BOX 40, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand

  4. 4

    E-mail: srusso2@unl.edu

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 31 JAN 2008
  2. Article first published online: 31 JAN 2008
This article corrects:

Growth–size scaling relationships of woody plant species differ from predictions of the Metabolic Ecology Model

Vol. 10, Issue 10, 889–901, Article first published online: 9 JUL 2007

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (49K)

References

  • Bolker, B. (in press). Ecological Models and Data in R. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
  • Clark, J.S., Mohan, J., Dietze, M. & Ibanez, I. (2003). Coexistence: How to identify trophic trade-offs. Ecology, 84, 17–31.
  • Edwards, A.W.F. (1992). Likelihood: Expanded Edition. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
  • Enquist, B.J., West, G.B., Charnov, E.L. & Brown, J.H. (1999). Allometric scaling of production and life-history variation in vascular plants. Nature, 401, 907–911.
  • Enquist, B.J., West, G.B. & Brown, J.H. (2000). Quarter-power allometric scaling in vascular plants: functional basis and ecological consequences. In: Scaling in Biology (eds Brown, J.H. & West, G.B.). Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 167–198.
  • Hilborn, R. & Mangel, M. (1997). The Ecological Detective. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
  • King, D.A., Davies, S.J., Nur Supardi, M.N. & Tan, S. (2005). Tree growth is related to light interception and wood density in two mixed dipterocarp forests of Malaysia. Func. Ecol., 19, 445–453.
  • Russo, S.E., Wiser, S.K. & Coomes, D.A. (2007). Growth–size scaling relationships of woody plant species differ from predictions of the Metabolic Ecology Model. Ecol. Lett., 10, 889–901.
  • Weiner, J. & Thomas, S.C. (2001). The nature of tree growth and the ‘age-related decline in forest productivity’. Oikos, 94, 374–376.
    Direct Link:
View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (49K)