SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Albert, R., Jeong, H. & Barabási, A. (2000). Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature, 406, 378382.
  • Arens, P., Van Der Sluis, T., Van’t Westende, W.P.C., Vosman, B., Vos, C.C. & Smulders, M.J.M. (2007). Genetic population differentiation and connectivity among fragmented Moor frog (Rana arvalis) populations in The Netherlands. Landscape Ecol., 22, 14891500.
  • Barabasi, A.L. & Bonabeau, E. (2003). Scale-free networks. Sci. Am., 288, 6069.
  • Beier, P., Majka, D.R. & Spencer, W.D. (2008). Forks in the road: choices in procedures for designing wildland linkages. Conserv. Biol., 22, 836851.
  • Belisle, M. (2005). Measuring landscape connectivity: the challenge of behavioral landscape ecology. Ecology, 86, 19881995.
  • Best, B., Urban, D. & Fay, J. (2008). ConnMod: connectivity modeling toolbox. Beta-release of software available at: http://mgel.nicholas.duke.edu/tools.
  • Bodin, O. & Norberg, J. (2007). A network approach for anlyzing spatially structured populations in fragmented landscape. Landscape Ecol., 22, 3144.
  • Den Boer, P.J. (1968). Spreading of risk and stabilization of animal numbers. Acta Biotheor., 18, 165194.
  • Borgatti, S.P. (2005). Centrality and network flow. Soc. Networks, 27, 5571.
  • Borgatti, S.P. (2006). Identifying sets of key players in a social network. Comput. Math. Organiz. Theory, 12, 2134.
  • Brooks, C.P. (2003). A scalar analysis of landscape connectivity. Oikos, 102, 433439.
  • Brown, J.H. & Kodric-Brown, A. (1977). Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology, 58, 445449.
  • Bunn, A.G., Urban, D.L. & Keitt, T.H. (2000). Landscape connectivity: a conservation application of graph theory. J. Environ. Manage., 59, 265278.
  • Calabrese, J.M. & Fagan, W.F. (2004). A comparison-shopper’s guide to connectivity metrics. Front. Ecol. Environ., 2, 529536.
  • Cantwell, M.D. & Forman, R.T.T. (1993). Landscape graphs: ecologication modeling with graph theory to detect configurations common to diverse landscapes. Landscape Ecol., 8, 239251.
  • Chartrand, G. (1977). Introductory Graph Theory. Dover, New York.
  • Chetkiewicz, C.-L.B., St. Claire, C.C. & Boyce, M.S. (2006). Corridors for conservation: integrating pattern and process. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 37, 317342.
  • Cook, B.D., Bunn, S.E. & Hughes, J.M. (2007). Molecular genetic and stable isotope signatures reveal complementary patterns of population connectivity in the regionally vulnerable southern pygmy perch (Nannoperca australis). Biol. Conserv., 138, 6072.
  • Crooks, K.R. & Sanjayan, M.A. (2006). Conservation Connectivity: Maintaining Connections for Nature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Cushman, S.A., McKelvey, K.S., Hayden, J. & Schwartz, M.K. (2006). Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling. Am. Nat., 168, 486499.
  • D’Eon, R.G., Glenn, S.M., Parfitt, I. & Fortin, M.-J. (2002). Landscape connectivity as a function of scale and organism vagility in a real forested landscape. Conserv. Ecol., 6(2), 10.
  • Dale, V.H. (ed.) (2003). Ecological Modeling for Resource Management. Springer, New York.
  • Dijkstra, E.W. (1959). A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numer. Math., 1, 269271.
  • Donovan, T.M., Jones, P.W., Annand, E.M. & Thompson, F.R. III (1997). Variation in local-scale edge effects: mechanisms and landscape context. Ecology, 78, 20642075.
  • Driezen, K., Adriaesen, F., Rondinini, C., Doncaster, C.P. & Matthysen, E. (2007). Evaluating least-cost model predictions with empirical dispersal data: a case-study using radiotracking data of hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus). Ecol. Modell., 209, 314322.
  • Estrada, E. & Bodin, O. (2008). Using network centrality measures to manage landscape connectivity. Ecol. Appl., 18, 18101825.
  • Estrada-Pena, A. (2003). The relationships between habitat topology, critical scsales of connectivity, and tick abundance (Ixodes ricinus) in a heterogeneous landscape in northern Spain. Ecography, 26, 661671.
  • Fagan, W.F. & Lutscher, F. (2006). Average dispersal success: linking home range, dispersal, and metapopulation dynamics to reserve design. Ecol. Appl., 16, 820828.
  • Fahrig, L. (2003). Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 34, 487515.
  • Fall, A., Fortin, M.-J., Manseau, M. & O’Brien, D. (2007). Spatial graphs: principles and applications for habitat connectivity. Ecosystems, 10, 448461.
  • Franc, A. (2004). Metapopulation dynamics as a contact process on a graph. Ecol. Complexity, 1, 4963.
  • Freeman, L.C. (1978). Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks, 1, 215239.
  • Freeman, L.C. (2004). The Development of Social Network Analysis – A Study in the Sociology of Science. Empirical Press, Vancouver.
  • Gardner, R.H. & Urban, D.L. (2003). Model testing and validation: past lessons and present challenges. In: Models in Ecosystem Science (eds Canham, C.D., Cole, J.J. & Lauenroth, W.K.). Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 184203.
  • Girvan, M. & Newman, M.E.J. (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 78217826.
  • Graf, R.F., Kramer-Schadt, S., Fernandez, N. & Grimm, V. (2007). What you see is where you go? Modeling dispersal in mountainous landscapes Landscape Ecol., 22, 853866.
  • Gustafson, E.J. & Gardner, R.H. (1996). The effect of landscape heterogeneity on the probability of patch colonization. Ecology, 77, 94107.
  • Hanski, I. & Gilpin, M. (1991). Metapopulation dynamics – brief-history and conceptual domain. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 42, 316.
  • Hanski, I. & Ovaskainen, O. (2000). The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature, 404, 755758.
  • Harrison, S. (1994). Metapopulations and conservation. In: Large-Scale Ecology and Conservation Biology (eds Edwards, P.J., Webb, N.R. & May, R.M.). Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 111128.
  • Hedgecock, D., Barger, P.H. & Edmunds, S. (2007). Genetic approaches to measuring connectivity. Oceanography, 20, 7079.
  • Keitt, T.H. (2003). Network theory: an evolving approach to landscape conservation. In: Ecological Modeling for Resource Management (ed. Dale, V.H.). Springer, New York, pp. 125134.
  • Keitt, T.H., Urban, D.L. & Milne, B.T. (1997). Detecting critical scales in fragmented landscapes. Conserv. Ecol., 1, 4.
  • Krause, A.E., Frank, K.A., Mason, D.M., Ulanowicz, R.E. & Taylor, W.W. (2003). Compartments revealed in food-web structure. Nature, 426, 282285.
  • Larkin, J.L., Maehr, D.S., Hoctor, T.S., Orlando, M.A. & Whitney, K. (2004). Landscape linkage and conservation planning for the black bear in west-central Florida. Anim. Conserv., 7, 2334.
  • Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. (1998). Numerical Ecology, 2nd English edition. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Levins, R. (1969). Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am., 15, 237240.
  • MacArthur, R.H. & Wilson, E.O. (1967). The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Margosian, M.L., Garrett, K.A., Hutchinson, J.M.S. & With, K.A. Connectivity of the American agricultural landscape: asessing the national risk of crop pest and disease spread. Bioscience (in press).
  • McDonough, C. & Paton, P.W.C. (2007). Salamander dispersal across a forested landscape fragmented by a golf course. J. Wildlife Manage., 71, 11631169.
  • McRae, B. (2006). Isolation by resistance. Evolution, 60, 11511561.
  • McRae, B. & Beier, P. (2007). Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 1988519890.
  • McRae, B.H., Dickson, B.G., Keitt, T.H. & Shah, V.B. (2008). Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology, 89, 27122724.
  • Melian, C.J. & Bascompte, J. (2002). Complex networks: two ways to be robust? Ecol. Lett., 5, 707708.
  • Minor, E.S. & Urban, D. (2007). Graph theory as a proxy for spatially explicit population models in conservation planning. Ecol. Appl., 17, 17711782.
  • Minor, E.S. & Urban, D.L. (2008). A graph-theory framework for evaluating landscape connectivity and conservation planning. Conserv. Biol., 22, 297307.
  • Minor, E.S., McDonald, R.I., Treml, E.A. & Urban, D.L. (2008). Uncertainty in spatially explicit population models. Biol. Conserv., 141, 956970.
  • Minor, E.S., Tessel, S., Engelhardt, K. & Lookingbill, T. The role of landscape connectivity in assembling exotic plant communities: a network analysis. Ecology (in press).
  • Newman, M.E.J. (2002). Spread of epidemic disease on networks. Phys. Rev. E, 66, 016128.
  • Newman, M. (2008). The physics of networks. Physics Today, 61, 3338.
  • Nicholson, E. & Possingham, H.P. (2006). Objectives for multi-species conservation planning. Conserv. Biol., 20, 871881.
  • O’Brien, D., Manseau, M., Fall, A. & Fortin, M.-J. (2006). Testing the importance of spatial configuration of winter habitat for woodland caribou: an application of graph theory. Biol. Conserv., 130, 7083.
  • Ovaskainen, O. (2004). Habitat-specific movement parameters estimated using mark-recapture data and a diffusion model. Ecology, 85, 242257.
  • Pascual-Hortal, L. & Saura, S. (2006). Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: towards the prioritization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation. Landscape Ecol., 21, 959967.
  • Phillips, S.J., Williams, P., Midgley, G. & Archer, A. (2008). Optimizing dispersal corridors for the Cape Proteaceae using network flow. Ecol. Appl., 18, 12001211.
  • Pimm, S.L. (1980). Food web design and the deletion of species. Oikos, 35, 139149.
  • Pinto, N. & Keitt, T.H. (2008). Beyond the least-cost path: two graph theory methods that assess corridor redundancy. Landscape Ecol. (in press).
  • Pulliam, H.R. (1988). Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am. Nat., 132, 652661.
  • Rayfield, B., Fortin, M.-J. & Fall, A. (2008). Identifying potential movement pathways in fragmented landscapes: incorporating uncertainty in landscape resistance. Paper presented at 23rd Annual Landscape Ecology Symposium, Madison, WI (ms in review).
  • Ries, L., Fletcher, R.J. Jr, Battin, J. & Sisk, T.D. (2004). Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 35, 491522.
  • Rothley, K.D. & Rae, C. (2005). Working backwards to move forwards: graph-based metrics for reserve network selection. Environ. Model. Assess., 10, 107113.
  • Schick, R.S. & Lindley, S.T. (2007). Directed connectivity among fish populations in a riverine network. J. Appl. Ecol., 44, 11161126.
  • Stauffer, D. (1985). Introduction to Percolation Theory. Taylor and Francis, London, UK.
  • Strogatz, S.H. (2001). Exploring complex networks. Nature, 410, 268276.
  • Theobald, D.M. (2006). Exploring the functional connectivity of landscapes using landscape networks. In: Conservation Connectivity: Maintaining Connections for Nature (eds Crooks, K.R. & Sanjayan, M.A.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 416444.
  • Thompson, F.R., Donovan, T.M., DeGraff, R.M., Faaborg, J. & Robinson, S.K. (2002). A multi-scale perspective of the effects of forest fragmentation on birds in eastern forests. In: Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Birds in Western Landscapes: Contrasts with Paradigms from the Eastern United States (eds Luke, G.T. & Dobkin, D.S.). Stud. Avian Biol., 25, 819.
  • Tischendorf, L. & Fahrig, L. (2000). On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos, 90, 719.
  • Treml, E.A., Halpin, P.N., Urban, D.L. & Pratson, L.F. (2008). Modeling population connectivity by ocean currents: a graph-theoretic approach for marine conservation. Landscape Ecol., 23, 1936.
  • Urban, D.L. (2002). Tactical monitoring of landscapes. In: Integrating Landscape Ecology into Natural Resource Management (eds Liu, J.L. & Taylor, W.W.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 294311.
  • Urban, D.L. (2005). Modeling ecological processes across scales. Ecology, 86, 19962006.
  • Urban, D. & Keitt, T.H. (2001). Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology, 82, 12051218.
  • Urban, D.L. & Shugart, H.H. (1986). Avian demography in mosaic landscapes: modeling paradigm and preliminary results. In: Modeling Habitat Relationships of Terrestrial Vertebrates (eds Verner, J., Morrison, M.L. & Ralph, C.J.). University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, pp. 273279.
  • Urban, D.L., McDonald, R.I., Minor, E.S. & Treml, E.A. (2006). Causes and consequences of land use change in the North Carolina Piedmont: the scope of uncertainty. In: Scaling and Uncertainty in Regional Ecological Studies: Methods and Applications (eds Wu, J., Jones, K.B. & Li, H.). Springer, New York, pp. 239257.
  • Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis – Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Watts, D.J. (1999). Small Worlds. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Watts, D.J. & Strogatz, S.H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393, 440442.
  • Wiens, J.A., Crawford, C.S. & Gosz, J.R. (1985). Boundary dynamics: a conceptual framework for studying landscape ecosystems. Oikos, 45, 421427.