Vertebrate range sizes indicate that mountains may be ‘higher’ in the tropics
Article first published online: 6 APR 2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01308.x
© 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS
Additional Information
How to Cite
McCain, C. M. (2009), Vertebrate range sizes indicate that mountains may be ‘higher’ in the tropics. Ecology Letters, 12: 550–560. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01308.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 15 MAY 2009
- Article first published online: 6 APR 2009
- Editor, Ross Crozier Manuscript received 8 January 2009 First decision made 2 February 2009 Manuscript accepted 6 March 2009
Keywords:
- Adaptation;
- AIC;
- dispersal;
- elevation;
- environmental gradient;
- speciation;
- temperature
Abstract
In 1967, Daniel Janzen proposed the influential, but largely untested hypothesis, that tropical mountain passes are physiologically higher than temperate mountains. I test his key prediction, the one upon which all the others rely: namely, that elevational range sizes of organisms get larger on mountains at increasing latitudes. My analyses use 170 montane gradients spanning 36.5° S to 48.2° N latitude compiled from over 80 years of research and 16 500 species of rodents, bats, birds, lizards, snakes, salamanders, and frogs. In support of Janzen’s prediction, I find that elevational range size increases with increasing latitude for all vertebrate groups except rodents. I document additional lines of evidence for temperature variability as a plausible mechanism for trends in vertebrate range size, including strong effects of thermoregulation and daily temperature variability, and a weak effect of precipitation.

1461-0248/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=3cdd97f41173d141f3f51773629729a6ad3be0ef)
1461-0248/asset/ele_centre.gif?v=1&s=8f1a28c45a6b32f9407a8bd9efb9c5b2aaffe521)
