SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adams, D.C. (2008). Phylogenetic meta-analysis. Evolution, 62, 567572.
  • Adams, D.C., Gurevitch, J. & Rosenberg, M. (1997). Resampling tests for meta-analysis of ecological data. Ecology, 78, 12771283.
  • Bucharova, A. & Van Kleunen, M. (2009). Introduction history and species characteristics partly explain naturalization success of North American woody species in Europe. J. Ecol., 97, 230238.
  • Colautti, R.I., Grigorovich, I.A. & MacIsaac, H.J. (2006). Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biol. Invasions, 8, 10231037.
  • Crawley, M.J. (1987). What makes a community invasible? In: Colonization, Succession and Stability (eds Gray, A.J., Crawley, M.J. & Edwards, P.J.). Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK, pp. 429453.
  • Daehler, C.C. (1998). The taxonomic distribution of invasive angiosperm plants: ecological insights and comparison to agricultural weeds. Biol. Conserv., 84, 167180.
  • Daehler, C.C. (2003). Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 34, 183211.
  • Davis, M.A., Grime, J.P. & Thompson, K. (2000). Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J. Ecol., 88, 528534.
  • Felsenstein, J. (1985). Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat., 125, 115.
  • Gray, A. (1879). The pertinacity and predominance of weeds. Am. J. Sci. Arts, 18, 161167.
  • Grotkopp, E. & Rejmánek, M. (2007). High seedling relative growth rate and specific leaf area are traits of invasive species: phylogenetically independent contrasts of woody angiosperms. Am. J. Bot., 94, 526532.
  • Grotkopp, E., Rejmánek, M. & Rost, T.L. (2002). Towards a causal explanation of plant invasiveness: seedling growth and life-history strategies of 29 pine (Pinus) species. Am. Nat., 159, 396419.
  • Grotkopp, E., Rejmánek, M., Sanderson, M.J. & Rost, T.L. (2004). Evolution of genome size in pines (Pinus) and its life-history correlates: supertree analyses. Evolution, 58, 17051729.
  • Groves, R.H., Panetta, F.D. & Virtue, J.G. (2001). Weed Risk Assessment. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia.
  • Gurevitch, J. & Hedges, L.V. (2001). Meta-analysis: combining the results of independent experiments. In: Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments (eds Scheiner, S.M. & Gurevitch, J.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 347369.
  • Hamilton, M.A., Murray, B.R., Cadotte, M.W., Hose, G.C., Baker, A.C., Harris, C.J. et al. (2005). Life-history correlates of plant invasiveness at regional and continental scales. Ecol. Lett., 8, 10661074.
  • Hawkes, C.V. (2007). Are invaders moving targets? The generality and persistence of advantages in size, reproduction, and enemy release in invasive plant species with time since introduction. Am. Nat., 170, 832843.
  • Hayes, K.R. & Barry, S.C. (2008). Are there any consistent predictors of invasion success? Biol. Invas., 10, 483506.
  • Hedges, L.V. & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
  • Van Kleunen, M. & Johnson, S.D. (2007). South African Iridaceae with rapid and profuse seedling emergence are more likely to become naturalized in other regions. J. Ecol., 95, 674681.
  • Van Kleunen, M. & Richardson, D.M. (2007). Invasion biology and conservation biology – time to join forces to explore the links between species traits and extinction risk and invasiveness. Progr. Phys. Geogr., 31, 447450.
  • Van Kleunen, M., Johnson, S.D. & Fischer, M. (2007). Predicting naturalization of southern African Iridaceae in other regions. J. Appl. Ecol., 44, 594603.
  • Van Kleunen, M., Manning, J.C., Pasqualetto, V. & Johnson, S.D. (2008). Phylogenetically independent associations between autonomous self-fertilization and plant invasiveness. Am. Nat., 171, 195201.
  • Kolar, C.S. & Lodge, D.M. (2001). Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol. Evol., 16, 199204.
  • La Sorte, F.A., McKinney, M.L. & Pyšek, P. (2007). Compositional similarity among urban floras within and across continents: biogeographical consequences of human-mediated biotic interchange. Glob. Change Biol., 13, 913921.
  • Lajeunesse, M.J. (2009). Meta-analysis and the comparative phylogenetic method. Am. Nat., 174, 369381.
  • Lajeunesse, M.J. & Forbes, M.R. (2003). Variable reporting and quantitative reviews: a comparison of three meta-analytical techniques. Ecol. Lett., 6, 448454.
  • Lake, J.C. & Leishman, M.R. (2004). Invasion success of exotic plants in natural ecosystems: the role of disturbance, plant attributes and freedom from herbivores. Biol. Conserv., 117, 215226.
  • Lambers, H. & Poorter, H. (1992). Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: a search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. Adv. Ecol. Res., 23, 187261.
  • Leimu, R., Mutikainen, P., Koricheva, J. & Fischer, M. (2006). How general are positive relationships between plant population size, fitness and genetic variation? J. Ecol., 94, 942952.
  • Leishman, M.R., Haslehurst, T., Ares, A. & Baruch, Z. (2007). Leaf trait relationships of native and invasive plants: community- and global-scale comparisons. New Phytol., 176, 635643.
  • Light, R.J. & Pillemer, D.B. (1984). Summing up: The Science of Reviewing Research. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Mason, R.A.B., Cooke, J., Moles, A.T. & Leishman, M.R (2008). Reproductive output of invasive versus native plants. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr., 17, 633640.
  • Mooney, H.A., Mack, R.N., McNeely, J.A., Neville, L.E., Schei, P.J. & Waage, J.K. (2005). Invasive Alien Species: A New Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.
  • Morales, C.L. & Traveset, A. (2009). A meta-analysis of impacts of alien vs. native plants on pollinator visitation and reproductive success of co-flowering native plants. Ecol. Lett., 12, 716728.
  • Muth, N.Z. & Pigliucci, M. (2006). Traits of invasives reconsidered: phenotypic comparisons of introduced invasive and introduced noninvasive plant species within two closely related clades. Am. J. Bot., 93, 188196.
  • Palmer, A.R. (1999). Detecting publication bias in meta-analysis: a case study of fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Am. Nat., 154, 220233.
  • Pimentel, D., Zuniga, R. & Morrison, D. (2005). Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ., 52, 273288.
  • Pyšek, P. (1998). Is there a taxonomic pattern to plant invasions? Oikos, 82, 282294.
  • Pyšek, P. & Richardson, D.M. (2006). The biogeography of naturalization in alien plants. J. Biogeogr., 33, 20402050.
  • Pyšek, P. & Richardson, D.M. (2007). Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: where do we stand? In: Biological Invasions (ed. Nentwig, W.). Springer, New York, pp. 97125.
  • Pyšek, P., Richardson, D.M. & Williamson, M. (2004). Predicting and explaining plant invasions through analysis of source area floras: some critical considerations. Divers. Distrib., 10, 179187.
  • Randall, R.P. (2002). A Global Compendium of Weeds. Richardson, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Rejmánek, M. (1999). Invasive plant species and invasible ecosystems. In: Invasive Species and Biodiversity Management (eds Sandlund, O.T., Schei, P.J. & Viken, A). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 79102.
  • Rejmánek, M., Richardson, D.M., Higgins, S.I., Pitcairn, M.J. & Grotkopp, E. (2005). Ecology of invasive plants: state of the art. In: Invasive Alien Species: A New Synthesis (eds Mooney, H.A., Mack, R.N., McNeely, J.A., Neville, L.E., Schei, P.J. & Waage, J.K.). Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 104161.
  • Richards, C.L., Bossdorf, O., Muth, N.Z., Gurevitch, J. & Pigliucci, M. (2006). Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecol. Lett., 9, 981993.
  • Rosenberg, M.S., Adams, D.C. & Gurevitch, J. (2000). MetaWin. Statistical Software for Meta-Analysis. Sinauer Ass. Inc., Sunderland, MA.
  • Roy, J. (1990). In search of characteristics of plant invaders. In: Biological Invasions in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin (eds Di Castri, J., Hansen, A.J. & Debussche, M.). Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 335352.
  • Wang, M.C. & Bushman, B.J. (1998). Using the normal quantile plot to explore meta-analytic data sets. Psychol. Methods, 3, 4654.
  • Weber, E. (2003). Invasive Plant Species of the World: A Reference Guide to Environmental Weeds. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.
  • Westoby, M., Falster, D.S., Moles, A.T., Vesk, P.A. & Wright, I.J. (2002). Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 33, 125159.
  • Wright, I.J., Reich, P.B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D.D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F. et al. (2004). The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature, 428, 821827.