Why are metabolic scaling exponents so controversial? Quantifying variance and testing hypotheses
Version of Record online: 28 MAR 2010
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS
Volume 13, Issue 6, pages 728–735, June 2010
How to Cite
Isaac, N. J. B. and Carbone, C. (2010), Why are metabolic scaling exponents so controversial? Quantifying variance and testing hypotheses. Ecology Letters, 13: 728–735. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01461.x
- Issue online: 18 MAY 2010
- Version of Record online: 28 MAR 2010
- Editor, David Storch Manuscript received 8 January 2010 First decision made 3 February 2010 Manuscript accepted 19 February 2010
Figure S1 Simulation results.
Table S1 Summary of the best model of metabolic scaling under four different information criteria and penalty terms.
Table S2 Summary of the best model of metabolic scaling for ectotherms and endotherms, both with and without temperature-correction.
Appendix S1 Methodological details and further analyses.
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer-reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
|ELE_1461_sm_fS1andtS1-2.doc||973K||Supporting info item|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.