Get access

Lianas suppress tree regeneration and diversity in treefall gaps


  • Stefan A. Schnitzer,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, PO Box 413, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA
    2. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 2072, Balboa, Republic of Panama
      Correspondence: E-mail:
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Walter P. Carson

    1. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
    Search for more papers by this author

Correspondence: E-mail:


Ecology Letters (2010) 13: 849–857


Treefall gaps are hypothesized to maintain diversity by creating resource-rich, heterogeneous habitats necessary for species coexistence. This hypothesis, however, is not supported empirically for shade-tolerant trees, the dominant plant group in tropical forests. The failure of gaps to maintain shade-tolerant trees remains puzzling, and the hypothesis implicated to date is dispersal limitation. In central Panama, we tested an alternative ‘biotic interference’ hypothesis: that competition between growth forms (lianas vs. trees) constrains shade-tolerant tree recruitment, survival and diversity in gaps. We experimentally removed lianas from eight gaps and monitored them for 8 years, while also monitoring nine un-manipulated control gaps. Removing lianas increased tree growth, recruitment and richness by 55, 46 and 65%, respectively. Lianas were particularly harmful to shade-tolerant species, but not pioneers. Our findings demonstrate that competition between plant growth forms constrains diversity in a species-rich tropical forest. Because lianas are abundant in many tropical systems, our findings may apply broadly.

Get access to the full text of this article