Suppression of herbivory by macroalgal density: a critical feedback on coral reefs?
Article first published online: 26 JAN 2011
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS
Volume 14, Issue 3, pages 267–273, March 2011
How to Cite
Hoey, A. S. and Bellwood, D. R. (2011), Suppression of herbivory by macroalgal density: a critical feedback on coral reefs?. Ecology Letters, 14: 267–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01581.x
- Issue published online: 20 FEB 2011
- Article first published online: 26 JAN 2011
- Editor, Tim Wootton Manuscript received 5 August 2010 First decision made 14 September 2010 Second decision made 30 November 2010 Manuscript accepted 10 December 2010
Appendix S1 Methodological details.
Figure S1 Variation in the removal rates of transplanted individual Sargassum thalli between diurnal and nocturnal periods on the reef crest of Pioneer Bay, Orpheus Island.
Figure S2 Spatial and temporal variation in removal rates of Sargassum thalli positioned within each of the macroalgal density treatments.
Figure S3 Influence of Sargassum biomass on the grazing intensity of herbivorous fishes for each day of the deployments.
Figure S4 The relationship between the biomass of potential predators and the biomass of Sargassum within the each of experimental patches.
Figure S5 Proportion of total mass standardized bites taken from each of the Sargassum density treatments by the two dominant browsing fish species, Kyphosus vaigiensis and Naso unicornis.
Table S1 Results of repeated measures anova comparing the spatial variation in removal rates among thalli within the high, medium, and low density macroalgal treatments.
Table S2 Results of repeated measures MANOVA comparing relative removal rates of Sargassum biomass among sites, density treatments, and days.
Table S3 Results of repeated measures MANOVA comparing the feeding intensity of the two dominant browsing species among sites, density treatments, and days.
Table S4 Summary of predatory fishes recorded within the habitat patches.
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer-reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
|ELE_1581_sm_appendixS1.pdf||20K||Supporting info item|
|ELE_1581_sm_fS1.pdf||28K||Supporting info item|
|ELE_1581_sm_fS2.pdf||61K||Supporting info item|
|ELE_1581_sm_fS3.pdf||86K||Supporting info item|
|ELE_1581_sm_fS4.pdf||68K||Supporting info item|
|ELE_1581_sm_fS5.pdf||55K||Supporting info item|
|ELE_1581_sm_tS1.pdf||60K||Supporting info item|
|ELE_1581_sm_tS2.pdf||10K||Supporting info item|
|ELE_1581_sm_tS3.pdf||60K||Supporting info item|
|ELE_1581_sm_tS4.pdf||10K||Supporting info item|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.