SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adams, D.C. (2008). Phylogenetic meta-analysis. Evolution, 62, 567572.
  • Aguilar, R., Ashworth, L., Galetto, L. & Aizen, M.A. (2006). Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. Ecol. Lett., 9, 968980.
  • Arias, S., Terrazas, R. & Cameron, K. (2003). Phylogenetic analysis of Pachycereus (Cactaceae, Pachycereeae) based on chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Syst. Bot., 28, 547557.
  • Augspurger, C. (1981). Reproductive synchrony of a tropical shrub: experimental studies on effects of pollinators and seed predators on Hybanthus prunifolius (Violaceae). Ecology, 62, 775788.
  • Augspurger, C. (1983). Phenology, flowering synchrony, and fruit set of six neotropical shrubs. Biotropica, 15, 257267.
  • Bullock, S.H. (1995). Plant reproduction in neotropical dry forest. In: Seasonally Dry Tropical Forest (eds Bullock, S.H., Mooney, H.A. & Mediona, E.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 277296.
  • Cameron, K.M. (2007). Molecular phylogenetics of Orchidaceae: the first decade of DNA sequencing. In: Orchid Biology: Reviews and Perspectives. (Memoir of the New York Botanical Garden 95) (eds Cameron, K.N., Arditti, J. & Kull, T.). Botanical Garden Press, New York, pp. 163200.
  • Crawley, M. (2007). The R Book. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester, West Sussex.
  • Davis, T.J., Barranclough, T.G., Chase, M.W., Soltis, P.S., Soltis, D.E. & Sovalainen, V. (2004). Darwin’s abominable mystery: insights from a supertree of the angiosperms. PNAS, 101, 19041909.
  • Dickerson, B.R., Brinck, K.W., Willson, M.F., Bentzen, P. & Quinn, T.P. (2005). Relative importance of salmon body size and arrival time at breeding grounds to reproductive success. Ecology, 86, 347352.
  • Domínguez, C.A. & Dirzo, R. (1995). Rainfall and flowering synchrony in a tropical shrub: variable selection on the flowering time of Erythroxylum havanense. Evol. Ecol., 9, 204216.
  • Egger, M., Smith, D., Schneider, G. & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315, 629634.
  • Ehrlén, J. & Münzbergová, Z. (2009). Timing of flowering: opposed selection on different fitness components and trait covariation. Am. Nat., 173, 819830.
  • Elzinga, J.A., Atlan, A., Biere, A., Gigord, L., Weis, A.E. & Bernasconi, G. (2007). Time after time: flowering phenology and biotic interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol., 22, 432439.
  • Endler, J.A. (1986). Natural Selection in the Wild. Princenton University Press, Princenton, NJ.
  • Felsenstein, J. (1985). Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat., 125, 115.
  • Fior, S., Karis, P.O., Casazza, G., Minuto, L. & Sala, F. (2006). Molecular phylogeny of the Caryophyllaceae (Caryophyllales) inferred from chloroplast matK and nuclear rDNA ITS sequences. Am. J. Bot., 93, 399411.
  • Forrest, J. & Thomson, J.D. (2010). Consequences of variation in flowering time within and among individuals of Mertensia fusiformis (Boraginaceae), an early spring wildflower. Am. J. Bot., 97, 3848.
  • Fox, G.A. & Kelly, C.K. (1993). Plant phenology: selection and neutrality. Trends Ecol. Evol., 8, 3435.
  • Gómez, J.M. (1993). Phenotypic selection on flowering synchrony in a high mountain plant, Hormathophylla Spinosa (Cruciferae). J. Ecol., 81, 605613.
  • GPWG (2000). A phylogeny of the grass family (Poaceae), as inferred from eight character sets. In: Grasses: Systematics and Evolution (eds Jacobs, S.W.L. & Everett, J.E.). Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Collingwood, Victoria, pp. 37.
  • Gurevitch, J. & Hedges, L.V. (1999). Statistical issues in ecological meta-analyses. Ecology, 80, 11421149.
  • Harder, L.D. & Johnson, S.D. (2009). Darwin’s beautiful contrivances: evolutionary and functional evidence for floral adaptation. New Phytol., 183, 530545.
  • Hedges, L.V. & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis. Academic Press, New York.
  • Hoekstra, H.E., Hoekstra, J.M., Berrigan, D., Vignieri, S.N., Hoang, A., Hill, C.E. et al. (2001). Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 91579160.
  • Houle, G. (2002). The advantages of early flowering in the spring ephemeral annual plant Floerkea proserpinacoides. New Phytol., 154, 689694.
  • Jansen, R.K., Michaels, H.J. & Palmer, J.D. (1991). Phylogeny and character evolution in the Asteraceae based on chloroplast DNA restriction site mapping. Syst. Bot., 16, 98115.
  • Johnson, S.D. (1993). Climatic and phylogenetic determinants of flowering seasonality in the Cape flora. J. Ecol., 81, 567572.
  • Johnson, L.A., Chan, L.M., Weese, T.L., Busby, L.D. & McMurry, S. (2008). Nuclear and cpDNA sequences combined provide strong inference of higher phylogenetic relationships in the phlox family (Polemoniaceae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 48, 9971012.
  • Jump, A.S. & Peñuelas, J. (2005). Running to stand still: adaptation and the response of plants to rapid climatic change. Ecol. Lett., 8, 10101020.
  • Kajita, T., Ohashi, H., Tateishi, Y., Bailey, C.D. & Doyle, J.J. (2001). rbcL and legume phylogeny, with particular reference to Phaseoleae, Millettieae, and allies. Syst. Bot., 26, 515536.
  • Kingsolver, J.G. & Pfennig, D.W. (2007). Patterns and power of phenotypic selection in nature. Bioscience, 57, 561572.
  • Kingsolver, J.G., Hoekstra, H.E., Hoekstra, J.M., Berrigan, D., Vignieri, S.N., Hill, C.E. et al. (2001). The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat., 157, 245261.
  • Kochmer, J.P. & Handel, S.N. (1986). Constraints and competition in the evolution of flowering phenology. Ecol. Monogr., 56, 303325.
  • Kron, K.A. (1997). Phylogenetic relationships of Rhododendroideae. Am. J. Bot., 84, 973980.
  • Kron, K.A., Powell, E.A. & Luteyn, J.L. (2002). Phylogenetic relationships within the blueberry tribe (Vaccinieae, Ericaceae) based on sequence data from MATK and nuclear ribosomal ITS regions, with comments on the placement of Satyria. Am. J. Bot., 89, 327336.
  • Kudo, G. (2006). Flowering phenologies of animal-pollinated plants: reproductive strategies and agents of selection. In: The Ecology and Evolution of Flowers (eds Harder, L. & Barret, S.C.H.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 139158.
  • Lacey, E.P. (1986). Onset of reproduction in plants: size- versus age-dependency. Trends Ecol. Evol., 1, 7275.
  • Lajeunesse, M.J. (2009). Meta-analysis and the comparative phylogenetic method. Am. Nat., 174, 369381.
  • Landa, K. (1992). Seasonal declines in offspring fitness and selection for early reproduction in nymph-overwintering grasshoppers. Evolution, 46, 121135.
  • Lande, R. & Arnold, S.J. (1983). The measurement of natural selection on correlated characters. Evolution, 37, 12011226.
  • Marquis, R.J. (1988). Phenological variation in the neotropical understory shrub Piper arieianum: causes and consequences. Ecology, 69, 15521565.
  • Mazer, S.J. & LeBuhn, G. (1999). Genetic variation in life-history traits: heritability estimates within and genetic differentiation among populations. In: Life History Evolution in Plants (eds Vuorisalo, T.O. & Mutikainen, P.K.). Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 85171.
  • McIntyre, G.I. & Best, K.F. (1978). Studies on the flowering of Thlaspi arvense L. IV. Genetic and ecological differences between early- and late-flowering strains. Bot. Gaz., 139, 190195.
  • McMillan, C. & Pagel, B.F. (1958). Phenological variation within a population of Symphoricarpos occidentalis. Ecology, 39, 766770.
  • Melampy, M.N. (1987). Flowering phenology, pollen flow and fruit production in the Andean shrub Befaria resinosa. Oecologia, 73, 293300.
  • Miller-Rushing, A.J. & Primack, R.B. (2008). Global warming and flowering times in Thoreau’s concord: a community perspective. Ecology, 89, 332341.
  • Morales, C.L. & Traveset, A. (2010). A meta-analysis of impacts of alien vs. native plants on pollinator visitation and reproductive success of co-flowering native plants. Ecol. Lett., 12, 716728.
  • Munguía-Rosas, M.A., Sosa, V.J., Ojeda, M.M. & De-Nova, J.A. (2009). Specialization clines in the pollination systems of agaves (Agavaceae) and columnar cacti (Cactaceae): a phylogenetically-controlled meta-analysis. Am. J. Bot., 96, 18871895.
  • Nyffeler, R. (2002). Phylogenetic relationships in the cactus family (Cactaceae) based on evidence from trnK/matK and trnL-trnF sequences. Am. J. Bot., 89, 312326.
  • Ollerton, J. & Diaz, A. (1999). Evidence for stabilising selection acting on flowering time in Arum maculatum (Araceae): the influence of phylogeny on adaptation. Oecologia, 119, 340348.
  • Ollerton, J. & Lack, A. (1992). Flowering phenology: an example of relaxation of natural selection? Trends Ecol. Evol., 7, 274276.
  • Ollerton, J. & Lack, A. (1993). Plant phenology: selection and neutrality – reply. Trends Ecol. Evol., 8, 3535.
  • Ollerton, J. & Lack, A. (1998). Relationships between flowering phenology, plant size and reproductive success in Lotus corniculatus (Fabaceae). Plant Ecol., 139, 3547.
  • Parachnowitsch, A.L. & Kessler, A. (2010). Pollinators exert natural selection on flower size and floral display in Penstemon digitalis. New Phytol., 188, 393402.
  • Parra-Tabla, V. & Vargas, F. (2004). Phenology and phenotypic natural selection on the flowering time of a deceit-pollinated tropical orchid, Myrmecophila christinae. Ann. Bot., 94, 243250.
  • Parra-Tabla, V. & Vargas, F. (2007). Flowering synchrony and floral display affect pollination success in a deceit-pollinated tropical orchid. Acta Oecol., 32, 2635.
  • Popp, M. & Oxelman, B. (2004). Evolution of a RNA polymerase gene family in Silene (Caryophyllaceae) -incomplete concerted evolution and topological congruence among paralogues. Syst. Biol., 53, 914932.
  • Primack, R.B. (1980). Variation in the phenology of natural populations of montane shrubs in New Zealand. J. Ecol., 68, 849862.
  • Primack, R.B. (1987). Relationships among flowers, fruits and seeds. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 18, 409430.
  • R Development Core Team (2007). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, Available at: http://www.R-project.org Last accessed 10 February 2011.
  • Rathcke, B. & Lacey, E.P. (1985). Phenological patterns of terrestrial plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 16, 179214.
  • Ro, K.E. & McPherson, B.A. (1997). Molecular phylogeny of the Aquilegia group (Ranunculaceae) based on internal transcribed spacers and 5.8S nuclear ribosomal DNA. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 25, 445461.
  • Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic Procedures for Social Research. Sage publications, California.
  • Salinas-Peba, L. & Parra-Tabla, V. (2007). Phenology and pollination of Manilkara zapota in forest and home gardens. For. Ecol. Manage., 248, 136142.
  • Sandring, S. & Ågren, J. (2009). Pollinator-mediated selection on floral display and flowering time in the perennial herb Arabidopsis lyrata. Evolution, 63, 12921300.
  • Sandring, S., Riihimäki, M.-A., Savolainen, O. & Ågren, J. (2007). Selection on flowering time and floral display in an alpine and a lowland population of Arabidopsis lyrata. J. Evol. Biol., 20, 558567.
  • Schleip, C., Sparks, T.H., Estrella, N. & Menzel, A. (2009). Spatial variation in onset dates and trends in phenology across Europe. Clim. Res., 39, 249260.
  • Schneider, J., Döring, E., Hilu, K.W. & Röser, M. (2009). Phylogenetic structure of the grass subfamily Pooideae based on comparison matK gene-3′trnK exon and nuclear ITS sequences. Taxon, 58, 405424.
  • Smith-Ramírez, C., Armesto, J.J. & Figueroa, J. (1998). Flowering, fruiting and seed germination in Chilean rain forest Myrtaceae: ecological and phylogenetic constraints. Plant Ecol., 136, 119131.
  • Stevens, L., Goodnight, C.J. & Kalisz, S. (1995). Multilevel selection in natural populations of Impatiens capensis. Am. Nat., 145, 513524.
  • Sun, H.-Q., Cheng, J., Zhang, F.-M., Luo, Yi.-Bo. & Ge, S. (2009). Reproductive success of non-rewarding Cypripedium japonicum benefits from low spatial dispersion pattern and asynchronous flowering. Ann. Bot., 103, 12271237.
  • Swofford, D.L. (2003). PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods). Sinauer, Sutherland, MA.
  • Taylor, N.P. & Zappi, D. (1989). An alternative view on generic delimitation and relationships in tribe Cereeae (Cactaceae). Bradleya, 7, 1340.
  • Thomas, D.W., Blondel, J., Perret, P., Lambrechts, M.M. & Speakman, J.R. (2001). Energetic and fitness costs of mismatching resource supply and demand in seasonally breeding birds. Science, 291, 25982600.
  • Van Dijk, H. & Hautekeete, N. (2007). Long day plants and the response to global warming: rapid evolutionary change in day length sensitivity is possible in wild beet. J. Evol. Biol., 20, 349357.
  • Verdú, M. & Traveset, A. (2004). Bridging meta-analysis and the comparative method: a test of seed size effect on germination after frugivores’ gut passage. Oecologia, 138, 414418.
  • Verdú, M. & Traveset, A. (2005). Early emergence enhances plant fitness: a phylogenetically controlled meta-analysis. Ecology, 86, 13851394.
  • Vietchtbauer, W. (2010). Metafor: Meta-analysis Package for R. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/metafor/. Last accessed 10 February 2011.
  • Wang, W., Lu, A.M., Ren, Y. & Endress, M.E. (2009). Phylogeny and classification of Ranunculales: evidence from four molecular loci and morphological data. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst., 11, 81110.
  • Wilczek, A.M., Roe, J.L., Knapp, M.C., Cooper, M.D., Lopez-Gallego, C., Martin, L.J. et al. (2009). Effects of genetic perturbation on seasonal life history plasticity. Science, 323, 930934.