Get access

Field estimates of reproductive success in a model insect: behavioural surrogates are poor predictors of fitness

Authors

  • David J. Thompson,

    1. University of Liverpool, Department of Evolution, Ecology and Behaviour, Biosciences Building, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Christopher Hassall,

    1. Carleton University, Department of Biology, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, K1S 5B6, Canada
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Chris D. Lowe,

    1. University of Liverpool, Department of Evolution, Ecology and Behaviour, Biosciences Building, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Phillip C. Watts

    Corresponding author
    1. University of Liverpool, Department of Evolution, Ecology and Behaviour, Biosciences Building, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK
      E-mail: phill@liv.ac.uk
    Search for more papers by this author

E-mail: phill@liv.ac.uk

Abstract

Ecology Letters (2011) 14: 905–913

Abstract

Understanding, and therefore measuring, factors that determine fitness is a central problem in evolutionary biology. We studied a natural population of Coenagrion puella (Odonata: Zygoptera) over two entire breeding seasons, with over a thousand individuals uniquely marked and genotyped, and all mating events at the rendezvous site recorded. Using a parentage analysis, fitness of individuals in the first generation was quantified as the numbers of offspring that survived to maturity. Although mating behaviour can be predicted by environmental and demographical variables, the numbers of mature offspring produced (fitness) cannot, and crucially, are poorly correlated with behavioural observations of mating. While fitness of both sexes was positively related to mating behaviour and to female’s ectoparasite burden, these behavioural observations explained little more variance in offspring production than environmental and demographical variables. Thus, we demonstrate that behavioural measures of reproductive success are not necessarily reliable estimates of fitness in natural populations.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary