Advertisement

A single climate driver has direct and indirect effects on insect population dynamics

Authors

  • Carol L. Boggs,

    Corresponding author
    1. Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, PO Box 519, Crested Butte, CO 81224, USA
    2. Department of Biology, 371 Serra Mall, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5020, USA
      E-mail:cboggs@stanford.edu
    Search for more papers by this author
  • David W. Inouye

    1. Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, PO Box 519, Crested Butte, CO 81224, USA
    2. Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-4415, USA
    Search for more papers by this author

E-mail:cboggs@stanford.edu

Abstract

Ecology Letters (2012) 15: 502–508

Abstract

Weather drives population dynamics directly, through effects on vital rates, or indirectly, through effects on the population’s competitors, predators or prey and thence on vital rates. Indirect effects may include non-additive interactions with density dependence. Detection of climate drivers is critical to predicting climate change effects, but identification of potential drivers may depend on knowing the underlying mechanisms. For the butterfly Speyeria mormonia, one climate driver, snow melt date, has multiple effects on population growth. Snow melt date in year t has density-dependent indirect effects. Through frost effects, early snow melt decreases floral resources, thence per-capita nectar availability, which determines fecundity in the lab. Snow melt date in year t + 1 has density-independent direct effects. These effects explain 84% of the variation in population growth rate. One climate parameter thus has multiple effects on the dynamics of a species with non-overlapping generations, with one effect not detectable without understanding the underlying mechanism.

Ancillary