• Please log in or register to access this feature.

Letter

You have free access to this content

Severe intergenerational reproductive conflict and the evolution of menopause

  1. Mirkka Lahdenperä1,†,*,
  2. Duncan O. S. Gillespie2,†,
  3. Virpi Lummaa3,4,
  4. Andrew F. Russell5,6

Article first published online: 22 AUG 2012

DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01851.x

Issue

Ecology Letters

Ecology Letters

Volume 15, Issue 11, pages 1283–1290, November 2012

Additional Information

How to Cite

Ecology Letters (2012) 15: 1283–1290

Author Information

  1. 1

    Section of Ecology, Department of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

  2. 2

    Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

  3. 3

    Department of Animal & Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

  4. 4

    Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin, Institute for Advanced Study, Berlin, Germany

  5. 5

    Centre for Ecology & Conservation, College of Life & Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK

  6. 6

    Station d'Ecologie Expérimentale du CNRS USR 2936, Moulis, France

  1. †

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

* Correspondence:
E-mail : mirkka.lahdenpera@utu.fi

  1. †

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 1 OCT 2012
  2. Article first published online: 22 AUG 2012
  3. Manuscript Accepted: 19 JUL 2012
  4. Manuscript Revised: 17 JUL 2012
  5. Manuscript Revised: 10 MAY 2012
  6. Manuscript Received: 10 APR 2012

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article with Supporting Information (HTML) Get PDF (269K)

References

  • Abbot, P., Abe, J., Alcock, J., Alizon, S., Alpedrinha, J.A.C., Andersson, M. et al. (2011). Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality. Nature, 471, E1–E4.
  • Alvarez, H. (2004). Residence groups among hunter-gatherers: a view of the claims and evidence for patrilocal bands. In: Kinship and Behavior in Primates (eds Chapais, B. & Berman, C.M.). Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 420–442.
  • Beekman, M. & Ratnieks, F.L.W. (2003). Power over reproduction in social hymenoptera. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B., 358, 1741–1753.
  • Butte, N.F. & King, J.C. (2005). Energy requirements during pregnancy and lactation. Pub. Health Nutrition, 8, 1010–1027.
  • Byars, S.G., Ewbank, D., Govindaraju, D.R. & Stearns, S.C. (2010). Natural selection in a contemporary human population. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 1787–1792.
  • Cant, M.A. & Johnstone, R.A. (2008). Reproductive conflict and the separation of reproductive generations in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 5332–5336.
  • Cant, M.A., Johnstone, R.A. & Russell, A.F.(2009). Reproductive skew and the evolution of menopause. In: Reproductive Skew in Vertebrates: Proximate and Ultimate Causes (eds Hager, R. & Jones, C.B.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 24–50.
  • Charlesworth, B. (1994). Evolution in Age-Structured Populations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Chisholm, J.S. & Burbank, V.K. (1991). Monogamy and polygyny in Southeast Arnhem-Land – Male Coercion and female choice. Ethol. Sociobiol., 12, 291–313.
  • Cockburn, A. & Russell, A.F. (2011). Cooperative breeding: a role of climate variability? Curr. Biol., 21, Dispatch R195–R197.
  • Cornwallis, C.K., West, S.A. & Griffin, A.S. (2009). Routes to indirect fitness in cooperatively breeding vertebrates: kin discrimination and limited dispersal. J. Evol. Biol., 22, 2445–2457.
    Direct Link:
  • Courtiol, A., Pettay, J., Jokela, M., Rotkirch, A. & Lummaa, V. (2012). Natural and sexual selection in a monogamous historical human population. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 8044–8049.
  • Emlen, S.T. (1995). An evolutionary theory of the family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 8092–8099.
  • Fogel, R.W. (1994). Economic growth, population theory, and physiology: the bearing of long-term processes on the making of economic policy. Am. Econom. Review, 84, 369–395.
  • Goodman, L.A., Keyfitz, N. & Pullum, T.W. (1974). Family formation and frequency of various kinship relationships. Theor. Pop. Biol., 5, 1–27.
  • Gurven, M. & Kaplan, H. (2007). Hunter-gatherer longevity: cross-cultural perspectives. Popul. Dev. Rev., 33, 321–365.
    Direct Link:
  • Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour I. J. Theor. Biol., 7, 1–16.
  • Hawkes, K., O'Connell, J.F., Jones, N.G.B., Alvarez, H. & Charnov, E.L. (1998). Grandmothering, menopause, and the evolution of human life histories. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95, 1336–1339.
  • Helle, S., Lummaa, V. & Jokela, J. (2005). Are reproductive and somatic senescence coupled in humans? Late, but not early, reproduction correlated with longevity in historical Sami women? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 272, 29–37.
  • Hill, K.R. & Hurtado, A.M. (1991). The evolution of premature reproductive senescence and menopause in human females: an evaluation of the ‘Grandmother Hypothesis’. Hum. Nat., 2, 313–349.
  • Hrdy, S.B. (2009). Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding. Harvard University Press, Harvard, MA, USA.
  • Jasienska, G. (2009). Reproduction and lifespan: trade-offs, overall energy budgets, intergenerational costs, and costs neglected by research. Am. J. Hum. Biol., 21, 524–532.
    Direct Link:
  • Korpelainen, H. (2003). Human life histories and the demographic transition: a case study from Finland, 1870-1949. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 120, 384–390.
    Direct Link:
  • Kramer, K. (2005). Children's help and the pace of reproduction: cooperative breeding in humans. Evol. Anthropol., 14, 224–237.
    Direct Link:
  • Lahdenperä, M., Lummaa, V., Helle, S., Tremblay, M. & Russell, A.F. (2004). Fitness benefits of prolonged post-reproductive lifespan in women. Nature, 428, 178–181.
  • Lahdenperä, M., Russell, A.F., Tremblay, M. & Lummaa, V. (2011a). Selection on menopause in two premodern human populations: no evidence for the mother hypothesis. Evolution, 65, 476–489.
    Direct Link:
  • Lahdenperä, M., Lummaa, V. & Russell, A.F. (2011b). Selection on male longevity in a monogamous human population: late-life survival brings no additional grandchildren. J. Evol. Biol., 24, 1053–1063.
    Direct Link:
  • Lumey, L.H. (1992). Decreased birthweights in infants after maternal in utero exposure to the Dutch famine of 1944–1945. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol., 6, 240–253.
    Direct Link:
  • Lummaa, V. (2003). Reproductive success and early developmental conditions in humans: downstream effects of pre-natal famine, birth weight and timing of birth. Am. J. Hum. Biol., 15, 370–379.
    Direct Link:
  • Mace, R. & Alvergne, A. (2012). Female reproductive competition within families in rural Gambia. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 279, 2219–2227.
  • Marlowe, F.W. (2004). Marital residence among foragers. Curr. Anthropol., 45, 277–284.
  • Mayer, P.J. (1984). On the definition and measure of inclusive fitness and the evolution of menopause –reply. Hum. Ecol., 12, 93–99.
  • Oli, M.K. (2003). Hamilton goes empirical: estimation of inclusive fitness from life-history data. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 270, 307–311.
  • Pavard, S., Metcalf, C.J.E. & Heyer, E. (2008). Senescence of reproduction may explain adaptive menopause in humans: a test of the mother hypothesis. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 136, 194–203.
    Direct Link:
  • Peccei, J.S. (2001). Menopause: adaptation or epiphenomenon? Evol. Anthropol., 10, 43–57.
    Direct Link:
  • Rogers, A.R. (1993). Why menopause? Evol. Ecol., 7, 406–426.
  • Roseboom, T.J., Painter, R.C., van Abeelen, A.F.M., Veenendaal, M.V.E. & de Rooij, S.R. (2011). Hungry in the womb: what are the consequences? Lessons from the Dutch famine. Maturitas, 70, 141–145.
  • Rousset, F. (2004). Genetic Structure and Selection in Subdivided Populations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.
  • Rubenstein, D.R. (2011). Spatiotemporal environmental variation, risk aversion, and the evolution of cooperative breeding as a bet-hedging strategy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 10816–10822.
  • Russell, A.F. (2004). Mammals: comparisons and contrasts. In: Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds (eds Koenig, W.D. & Dickinson, J.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 210–227.
  • Saarivirta, T., Consoli, D. & Dhondt, P. (2010). Suomen terveydenhuoltojärjestelmän ja sairaaloiden kehittyminen. Vaatimattomista oloista modernin terveydenhuollon eturintamaan. Kasvatus & Aika, 3, 25–41.
  • Sear, R. & Mace, R. (2008). Who keeps offspring alive? A review of the effects of kin on offspring survival. Evol. Hum. Behav., 29, 1–18.
  • Sear, R., Mace, R. & McGregor, I.A. (2000). Maternal grandmothers improve nutritional status and survival of offspring in rural Gambia. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B., 267, 1641–1647.
  • Shanley, D.P. & Kirkwood, T.B.L. (2001). Evolution of the human menopause. BioEssays, 23, 282–287.
    Direct Link:
  • Shanley, D.P., Sear, R., Mace, R. & Kirkwood, T.B.L. (2007). Testing evolutionary theories of menopause. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B., 274, 2943–2949.
  • Soininen, A.M. (1974). Old traditional Agriculture in Finland in the 18th and 19th Centuries. Forssan Kirjapaino Oy, Forssa.
  • Voland, E., Chasiotis, A. & Schiefhovel, W. (2005). Grandmotherhood: The Evolutionary Significance of the Second Half of Female Life. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.
  • West, S.A., Gardner, A., Shuker, D.M., Reynolds, T., Burton-Chellow, M., Sykes, E.M. et al. (2006). Cooperation and the scale of competition in humans. Curr. Biol., 16, 1103–1106.
  • Williams, G.C. (1957). Pleiotropy, natural selection and the evolution of senescence. Evolution, 11, 398–411.
  • Wilson, E.O. (1971). The Insect Societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
View Full Article with Supporting Information (HTML) Get PDF (269K)