DNA sequence-based analysis of the Pseudomonas species
Article first published online: 25 FEB 2010
© 2010 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Special Issue: Pseudomonas. Editors: Professors Burkhard Tummler, Victor de Lorenzo, Alain Filloux and Joyce Loper
Volume 12, Issue 6, pages 1513–1530, June 2010
How to Cite
Mulet, M., Lalucat, J. and García-Valdés, E. (2010), DNA sequence-based analysis of the Pseudomonas species. Environmental Microbiology, 12: 1513–1530. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02181.x
- Issue published online: 3 JUN 2010
- Article first published online: 25 FEB 2010
- Received 28 October, 2009; accepted 7 January, 2010.
Fig. S1. Phylogenetic affiliation of the 16 Pseudomonas strains which genome has been completely sequenced. Phylogenetic tree is based on the phylogenetic analysis of four concatenated genes (16S rRNA, gyrB, rpoB and rpoD). Distance matrices were calculated by the Jukes-Cantor method. Dendrograms were generated by neighbour-joining. Cellvibrio japonicum Ueda107 was used as outgroup. The bar indicates sequence divergence.
Table S1. Mean, maximal and minimal similarities for each gene individually analysed or in the concatenated analysis of 107 Pseudomonas type strains.
Table S2. BLAST and ANIb analysis matrix of the Pseudomonas complete genomes. Lower left corner shows BLAST matrix data. Upper right corner shows ANIb matrix data.
Table S3. ANIm and TETRA analysis matrix of the Pseudomonas complete genomes. Lower left corner shows ANIm matrix data. Upper right corner shows TETRA matrix data.
Table S4. PCR primers used in this study.
Table S5. GenBank accession numbers of the sequences used in this study. Accession numbers of sequences determined in this study are indicated in bold.
Please note: Wiley-Blackwell are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
|EMI_2181_sm_FigS1-1.eps||8666K||Supporting info item|
|EMI_2181_sm_FigS1-2.eps||5228K||Supporting info item|
|EMI_2181_sm_TabS1-5.doc||204K||Supporting info item|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.