Temporal variability in the diversity and composition of stream bacterioplankton communities
Version of Record online: 25 MAY 2012
© 2012 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Special Issue: Microbial Communities - Structure, Behaviour, Evolution
Volume 14, Issue 9, pages 2417–2428, September 2012
How to Cite
Portillo, M. C., Anderson, S. P. and Fierer, N. (2012), Temporal variability in the diversity and composition of stream bacterioplankton communities. Environmental Microbiology, 14: 2417–2428. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02785.x
- Issue online: 4 SEP 2012
- Version of Record online: 25 MAY 2012
- Received 28 January, 2012; revised 23 April, 2012; accepted 26 April, 2012.
Fig. S1. Time series of selected physicochemical parameters correlated with bacterioplankton community composition (Table 1) for each sampling site, excluding DOC and TDN.
Fig. S2. Semi-variograms of the UniFrac distance from samples of each sampling site as a function of the corresponding pairwise distance in days.
Fig. S3. Species–time relationship power function transformed and plotted in log–log space. Slope of the line of best fit shown here is equivalent to power function exponent from non-transformed data.
Table S1. A. Relative average abundances of phyla (class for Proteobacteria) classified with BLAST taxonomy across all 107 stream samples from the four sampling sites. Those phyla representing less than 0.5% of the abundance in average for all the sampling points are grouped in ‘other phyla’ including: AD3, BH1, BRC1, Caldiserica, Caldithrix_KSB1, CCM11b, Chlorobi, Deferribacteres, Elusomicrobia, Fibrobacteres, Fusobacteria, Gemmatimonadetes, GN02, Lentisphaerae, Marine group A, MVP-15, NC10, Nitrospirae, NKB19, OP10, OP11, OP8, SC3, SC4, SM2F11, SPAM, Spirochaetes, SR1, Synergistetes, TG3, Thermi, Thermotogae, TM6, TM7, WPS-2, WS1, WS2, WS3, WS6, ZB3.
B. Relative abundances of bacterial taxa of the most abundant phyla listed in A. Numbers in bold represent the sum of sequences within each of the phylum (identical to those shown in A). Asterisks indicate sequences classified to the phylum level only.
Table S2. A. Dimensions and discharge details for each of the streams from this study.
B. Physicochemical data and date of sampling for each sample included in this study.
Table S3. Correlation between unweighted UniFrac distances and stream physicochemical parameters (Spearman rank correlations estimated using Mantel tests)a.
Table S4. Correlations between alpha diversity levels and stream physicochemical parameters estimated by linear regression analyses. In all the cases r < 0.21 and P > 0.05.
|EMI_2785_sm_FS1.TIF||8498K||Supporting info item|
|EMI_2785_sm_FS2.TIF||4857K||Supporting info item|
|EMI_2785_sm_FS3.TIF||8498K||Supporting info item|
|EMI_2785_sm_Tabs.doc||340K||Supporting info item|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.