SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M et al. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 2003; 92: 20510
  • 2
    Rogers CG, Trock BP, Walsh PC. Preservation of accessory pudendal arteries during radical retropubic prostatectomy: surgical technique and results. Urology 2004; 64: 14851
  • 3
    Parsons K, Marschke P, Maples P et al. Effect of methylprednisolone on return of sexual function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2004; 64: 98790
  • 4
    Kaul S, Bhandari A, Hemal A et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy with preservation of the prostatic fascia: a feasibility study. Urology 2005; 66: 11261130
  • 5
    D’Amico A, Whittington R, Malkowicz S et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 1998; 280: 96973
  • 6
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 2145
  • 7
    Menon M, Shrivastava A, Sarle R et al. Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy. a single-team experience of 100 cases. J Endourol 2003; 17: 78590
  • 8
    Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody JO et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases. Urol Clin North Am 2004; 31: 70117
  • 9
    Rosen R, Cappelleri J, Smith M et al. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 1999; 11: 31924
  • 10
    Krygiel JM, Smith DS, Homan SM et al. Intermediate term biochemical progression rates after radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in patients with screen detected prostate cancer. J Urol 2005; 174: 12630
  • 11
    Kiyoshima K, Yokomizo A, Yoshida T et al. Anatomical features of periprostatic tissue and its surroundings. A histological analysis of 79 radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2004; 34: 4636
  • 12
    Sato Y, Rehman J, Santizo C et al. Significant physiological roles of ancillary penile nerves on increase in intracavernous pressure in rats: experiments using electrical stimulation of the medial preoptic area. Int J Impot Res 2001; 13: 824
  • 13
    Menon M, Kaul, S, Bhandari A et al. Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy. A questionnaire–based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques. J Urol 2005; 174: 23512355
  • 14
    Emerson RE, Koch MO, Daggy JK. Closest distance between tumor and resection margin in radical prostatectomy specimens lacks prognostic significance. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29: 2259
  • 15
    Kessler TM, Burkhard FC, Perimenis P et al. Attempted nerve sparing surgery and age have a significant effect on urinary continence and erectile function after radical cystoprostatectomy and ileal orthotopic bladder substitution. J Urol 2004; 172: 13237
  • 16
    Rabbani F, Patel M, Scardino P. Time course of recovery of potency after bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2004; 171 (Suppl): 310, Abstract
  • 17
    Schover L, Fouladi R, Warneke C et al. Defining sexual outcomes after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer 2002: 95: 177385
  • 18
    Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Doublet JD, Baumert H, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 550 procedures. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2002; 43: 12333
  • 19
    Hoznek A, Salomon L, Olsson LE et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The Creteil experience. Eur Urol 2001; 40: 3845
  • 20
    Rassweiler J, Schulze M, Teber D, Seemann O, Frede T. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: functional and oncological outcomes. Curr Opin Urol 2004; 14: 7582
  • 21
    Stolzenburg JU, Do M, Rabenalt R et al. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: initial experience after 70 procedures. J Urol 2003; 169: 206671
  • 22
    Hara I, Kawabata G, Miyake H et al. Comparison of quality of life following laparoscopic and open prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 2003; 169: 20458
  • 23
    Ahlering TE, Woo D, Eichel L, Lee DI, Edwards R, Skarecky DW. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes. Urology 2004; 63: 81922
  • 24
    Patel VR, Tully AS, Holmes R, Lindsay J. Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting - the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases. J Urol 2005; 174: 26972
  • 25
    Bentas W, Wolfram M, Jones J, Brautigam R, Kramer W, Binder J. Robotic technology and the translation of open radical prostatectomy to laparoscopy: the early Frankfurt experience with robotic radical prostatectomy and one year follow-up. Eur Urol 2003; 44: 17581
  • 26
    Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology 2002; 60: 8648
  • 27
    Tewari A, Kaul S, Menon M. Robotic radical prostatectomy: a minimally invasive therapy for prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep 2005; 6: 458