SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Harbour R, Miller J. A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines. BMJ 2001; 323: 3346
  • 2
    Devereaux PJ, Bhandari M, Clarke M et al. Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2005; 330: 88
  • 3
    Scales CD Jr, Norris RD, Keitz SA et al. A critical assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in the urology literature. J Urol 2007; 177: 10904
  • 4
    Borawski KM, Norris RD, Fesperman SF, Vieweg J, Preminger GM, Dahm P. Levels of evidence in the urological literature. J Urol 2007; 178: 142933
  • 5
    Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001; 357: 11914
  • 6
    Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health 2004; 94: 3616
  • 7
    Rangel SJ, Kelsey J, Colby CE, Anderson J, Moss RL. Development of a quality assessment scale for retrospective clinical studies in pediatric surgery. J Pediatr Surg 2003; 38: 3906
  • 8
    Cho MK, Bero LA. Instruments for assessing the quality of drug studies published in the medical literature. JAMA 1994; 272: 1014
  • 9
    Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998; 52: 37784
  • 10
    Margetts BM, Thompson RL, Key T et al. Development of a scoring system to judge the scientific quality of information from case-control and cohort studies of nutrition and disease. Nutr Cancer 1995; 24: 2319
  • 11
    Rangel SJ, Kelsey J, Henry MC, Moss RL. Critical analysis of clinical research reporting in pediatric surgery: justifying the need for a new standard. J Pediatr Surg 2003; 38: 173943
  • 12
    Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT Statement. JAMA 1996; 276: 6379
  • 13
    ISI Web of Knowledge. Journal Citation Reports. Thomson Corporation, 2007
  • 14
    PLoS Medicine Editors. Many reviews are systematic but some are more transparent and completely reported than others. PLoS Med 2007; 4: e147
  • 15
    Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: W112
  • 16
    Devereaux PJ, Choi PT, El-Dika S et al. An observational study found that authors of randomized controlled trials frequently use concealment of randomization and blinding, despite the failure to report these methods. J Clin Epidemiol 2004; 57: 12326
  • 17
    Sanderson S, Tatt ID, Higgins JP. Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. Int J Epidemiol 2007; 36: 66676
  • 18
    Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007; 370: 14537
  • 19
    Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148: 295309
  • 20
    Altman DG, Simera I, Hoey J, Moher D, Schulz K. EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research. Lancet 2008; 371: 114950