1464-410X/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=3b023a287baccfcd7715cf1935101c4ef9feb906)
1464-410X/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=2aeadcb16d199baae496a2f637919008651befce)
You have free access to this content
Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis
Article first published online: 5 MAY 2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08532.x
© 2009 THE AUTHORS. JOURNAL COMPILATION © 2009 BJU INTERNATIONAL
Additional Information
How to Cite
Rocco, B., Matei, D.-V., Melegari, S., Ospina, J. C., Mazzoleni, F., Errico, G., Mastropasqua, M., Santoro, L., Detti, S. and De Cobelli, O. (2009), Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis. BJU International, 104: 991–995. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08532.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 3 SEP 2009
- Article first published online: 5 MAY 2009
- Accepted for publication 15 January 2009
REFERENCES
- 1Prostate cancer epidemiology. Lancet 2003; 361: 859– 64
- 2, , , Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial case report. J Urol 1992; 147: 246A
- 3, , et al. Nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: our technique. Eur Urol 2006; 49: 344–52
- 4, , , , Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Preliminary evaluation after 28 interventions. J Urol 1998; 27: 1570–4
- 5, Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2001; 87: 408–10
- 6, , Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures. Cancer 2007; 110: 1951–8
- 7, , , Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative outcomes of 1500 cases. J Endourol 2008; 22: 2299–305
- 8Radical retropubic prostatectomy. In WalshPC, RetikAB, StameyTA, VaughanED eds, Campbell’s Urology, 6th edn, Vol. 3 Chapter 78. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1992: 2865–86
- 9, , , Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Ohio State University technique. J Robotic Surg 2007; 1: 51–9
- 10, , et al. Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 2006; 175: 2201–6
- 11, , et al. Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2007; 57: 996–1003
- 12, Outcomes of retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Urology 2008; 72: 412–6
- 13, , Update on robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Scientific World Journal 2006; 6: 2542–52
- 14, , et al. Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter? World J Urol 2007; 25: 149–60
- 15, , , , , Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression? BJU Int 2008; 102: 1413–8
- 16, , et al. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 2005; 174: 903–7
- 17, , , Members of the VIP Team. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 2003; 92: 205–10
- 18, , , , , Robotic technology and the translation of open radical prostatectomy to laparoscopy: the early Frankfurt experience with robotic radical prostatectomy and one year follow-up. Eur Urol 2003; 44: 175–81
- 19, , , , Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. A report on the current state of expertise. Rev Anticancer Ther 2007; 7: 1269–78
- 20, , , , Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2007; 51: 45–55
- 21, Outcome of retropubic, laparoscopic and robot-assisted prostatectomy. Adult Urol 2008; 72: 412–6
- 22, , , Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirement for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2006; 67: 360–3
- 23
- 24, , et al. Early continence outcomes of posterior muscolofascial plate reconstruction during robotic and laparoscopic prostatectomy. BJU Int 2008; 101: 1135–9
- 25, , et al. Total reconstruction of the vesico-urethral junction. BJU Int 2008; 101: 871–7
- 26, , et al. Surgery Illustrated – focus on details. Modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter: application to robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. BJU Int 2008; 102: 1482–5
- 27, , . Rapid communication: early potency outcomes with cautery-free neurovascular bundle preservation with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 2005; 19: 715–8
- 28, , et al. Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation. Urology 2005; 66: 419–23
- 29, Analysing Survival Data from Clinical Trials and Observational studies. Chichester: Wiley, 1985