Targeted prostate cancer screening in men with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 detects aggressive prostate cancer: preliminary analysis of the results of the IMPACT study
Article first published online: 14 SEP 2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09648.x
© 2010 THE INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2010 BJU INTERNATIONAL
Additional Information
How to Cite
Mitra, A. V., Bancroft, E. K., Barbachano, Y., Page, E. C., Foster, C. S., Jameson, C., Mitchell, G., Lindeman, G. J., Stapleton, A., Suthers, G., Evans, D. G., Cruger, D., Blanco, I., Mercer, C., Kirk, J., Maehle, L., Hodgson, S., Walker, L., Izatt, L., Douglas, F., Tucker, K., Dorkins, H., Clowes, V., Male, A., Donaldson, A., Brewer, C., Doherty, R., Bulman, B., Osther, P. J., Salinas, M., Eccles, D., Axcrona, K., Jobson, I., Newcombe, B., Cybulski, C., Rubinstein, W. S., Buys, S., Townshend, S., Friedman, E., Domchek, S., Ramon y Cajal, T., Spigelman, A., Teo, S. H., Nicolai, N., Aaronson, N., Ardern-Jones, A., Bangma, C., Dearnaley, D., Eyfjord, J., Falconer, A., Grönberg, H., Hamdy, F., Johannsson, O., Khoo, V., Kote-Jarai, Z., Lilja, H., Lubinski, J., Melia, J., Moynihan, C., Peock, S., Rennert, G., Schröder, F., Sibley, P., Suri, M., Wilson, P., Bignon, Y. J., Strom, S., Tischkowitz, M., Liljegren, A., Ilencikova, D., Abele, A., Kyriacou, K., van Asperen, C., Kiemeney, L., The IMPACT Study Collaborators, Easton, D. F. and Eeles, R. A. (2011), Targeted prostate cancer screening in men with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 detects aggressive prostate cancer: preliminary analysis of the results of the IMPACT study. BJU International, 107: 28–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09648.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 23 DEC 2010
- Article first published online: 14 SEP 2010
- Accepted for publication 7 May 2010
REFERENCES
- 1The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Cancer risks in BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91: 1310–6
- 2, . Cancer Incidence in BRCA1 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94: 1358–65
- 3, . The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). Br J Urol 1997; 79 (Suppl. 1): 68–71
- 4, , et al.; Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial Project Team. Design of the the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. Control Clin Trials 2000; 21 (Suppl.): 273–309
- 5
- 6, , III et al. Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 1310–9
- 7, , et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 1320–8
- 8, , . Cancer screening in the United States, 2009: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin 2009; 59: 27–41
- 9, , , . Screening for prostate cancer: estimating the magnitude of overdetection. CMAJ 1998; 159: 1368–72
- 10, . MISCAN: estimating lead-time and over-detection by simulation. BJU Int 2003; 92 (Suppl. 2): 106–11
- 11, , et al. Prostate cancer in male BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers has a more aggressive phenotype. Br J Cancer 2008; 98: 502–7
- 12, , et al. Long-term outcome among men with conservatively treated localized prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 2006; 95: 1186–94
- 13, , et al. A screening study of prostate cancer in high risk families. J Urol 1992; 148: 826–8
- 14, , et al. The impact of family history on early detection of prostate cancer. Nat Med 1995; 1: 99–101
- 15, , , , . Detection of subclinical cancers by prostate-specific antigen screening in asymptomatic men from high-risk prostate cancer families. Clin Cancer Res 1999; 5: 1275–9
- 16, , et al. Family history and prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 2658–63
- 17, , et al. Targeted screening for prostate cancer in high risk families: early onset is a significant risk factor for disease in first degree relatives. J Urol 2002; 168: 483–7
- 18, , , . Screening for prostate cancer in high risk populations. J Urol 2002; 168: 1980–3
- 19, , et al. Free prostate-specific antigen improves prostate cancer detection in a high-risk population of men with a normal total PSA and digital rectal examination. Urology 2003; 61: 754–9
- 20, , , . Male BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a pilot study investigating medical characteristics of patients participating in a prostate cancer prevention clinic. Prostate 2005; 65: 124–9
- 21, , et al. High prevalence of screening-detected prostate cancer among Afro-Caribbeans: the Tobago Prostate Cancer Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002; 11: 726–9
- 22
- 23, , et al. Screening for prostate cancer in Dutch hereditary prostate cancer families. Int J Cancer 2008; 122: 871–6
- 24, , et al. Prostate cancer progression and survival in BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99: 929–35
- 25, , et al. Rapid progression of prostate cancer in men with a BRCA2 mutation. Br J Cancer 2008; 99: 371–4
- 26, , et al. Absence of 185delAG mutation of the BRCA1 gene and 6174delT mutation of the BRCA2 gene in Ashkenazi Jewish men with prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 1998; 78: 771–3
- 27, , et al. Common mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 do not contribute to early prostate cancer in Jewish men. Prostate 1999; 40: 172–7
- 28, , et al. The Jewish Ashkenazi founder mutation in the BRCA1/BRCA2 genes are not found at an increased frequency in Ashkenazi patients with prostate cancer. Am J Hum Genet 1999; 65: 921–4
- 29, , et al. The rate of the founder Jewish mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in prostate cancer in Israel. Br J Cancer 2000; 83: 463–6
- 30, , et al. A twofold increase in BRCA mutation related prostate cancer among Ashkenazi Israelis is not associated with distinctive histopathology. J Med Genet 2003; 40: 787–92
- 31, , , IMPACT Steering Committee and Collaborators. A review of targeted screening for prostate cancer: introducing the IMPACT study. BJU Int 2007; 99: 1350–5
- 32, , et al. Major shifts in the treatment and prognosis of prostate cancer due to changes in pathological diagnosis and grading. BJU Int 2007; 100: 1240–4
- 33National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence. Prostate cancer: diagnosis and treatment guideline. 2008. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/CG058. Accessed 1 October 2009
- 34, , et al. Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update. J Urol 2007; 177: 2106–31
- 35
- 36, , , . Recruitment in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial: the First Phase of Recruitment at Henry Ford Health System. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008; 17: 827–33
- 37, , et al. The feasibility and results of a population-based approach to evaluating prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer in men with a raised familial risk. Br J Cancer 2006; 94: 499–506
- 38, , . A comparison of first and repeat (four years later) prostate cancer screening in a randomized cohort of a symptomatic men aged 55-75 years using a biopsy indication of 3.0 ng/ml (results of ERSPC, Rotterdam). Prostate 2006; 66: 604–12
- 39, , et al. Evaluation of the needs of male carriers of mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 who have undergone genetic counseling. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 67: 1494–504
- 40, , et al. BRCA1/2 predictive testing: a study of uptake in two centers. Eur J Hum Genet 2004; 12: 654–62
- 41, , , , . Comparison of proactive and usual approaches to offering predictive testing for BRCA1/2 mutations in unaffected relatives. Clin Genet 2009; 75: 124–32
- 42, , , . Men in breast cancer families: a preliminary qualitative study of awareness and experience. J Med Genet 1998; 35: 739–44
- 43, , , , , . Prostate cancer screening in men with a family history of prostate cancer: the role of partners in influencing men’s screening uptake. Urology 2007; 70: 738–42
- 44, , , . The value of different screening tests in predicting prostate biopsy outcome in screening for prostate cancer data from a multicenter study (ERSPC). Prostate 2007; 67: 439–46
- 45, , et al. Cancer detection and cancer characteristics in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) – Section Rotterdam. A comparison of two rounds of screening. Eur Urol 2007; 52: 89–97
- 46, , et al. Evaluation of pro-prostate specific antigen for early detection of prostate cancer in men with a total prostate specific antigen range of 4.0–10.0 ng/mL. J Urol 2003; 170: 723–6
- 47, , , , . Does the type of prostatic atrophy influence the association of extent of atrophy in needle biopsies and serum prostate-specific antigen levels? Urology 2009; 74: 1111–5
- 48, , et al. Incidence and prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia in primary care – the Triumph project. Eur Urol 2002; 42: 323–8
- 49, , et al. Serum prostate-specific antigen in a community-based population of healthy men. Establishment of age-specific reference ranges. JAMA 1993; 270: 860–4
- 50, , et al. Early detection of prostate cancer in 2007. Part 1: PSA and PSA kinetics. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 468–77
- 51, , , . Should men age 55-74 presenting with PSA <3.0 ng/ml be biopsied to diagnose prostate cancer? Eur Urol Suppl 2007; 6: 222
- 52Cancer Research UK 2009. Available at: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/prostate/incidence. Accessed 1 October 2009
- 53Australia’s Health 2004. Available at: http://www.aihw.gov.au. Accessed 1 October 2009
- 54, , , . A model of prostate-specific antigen screening outcomes for low to High Risk Men. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169 (17): 1603–10

1464-410X/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=3b023a287baccfcd7715cf1935101c4ef9feb906)
1464-410X/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=2aeadcb16d199baae496a2f637919008651befce)
