Current status of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
Article first published online: 11 MAY 2012
© 2012 BJU INTERNATIONAL
Volume 110, Issue 11, pages 1602–1606, December 2012
How to Cite
Gohil, R., Ahmed, K., Kooiman, G., Khan, M. S., Dasgupta, P. and Challacombe, B. (2012), Current status of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. BJU International, 110: 1602–1606. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11151.x
- Issue published online: 6 DEC 2012
- Article first published online: 11 MAY 2012
- Accepted for publication 8 February 2012
- robotic surgery;
What's known on the subject? and What does the study add?
The use of robotic assistance for the partial nephrectomy procedure has emerged as an alternative that may help some of the technical challenges of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. The main concerns in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy relates to a steeper ‘learning curve’, prolonged warm ischaemia times and the potential for postoperative haemorrhage.
The article delineates the dynamics of patient preparation, the surgical team, surgical technique & post-operative care to conclude that robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy is a viable alternative to both open and laparoscopic techniques.
Partial nephrectomy has shown both improved overall patient survival and more effective preservation of renal function, when compared with radical nephrectomy. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy has several potential advantages over the laparoscopic approach. Robotic assistance allows urologists to perform this complex reconstructive procedure more quickly, with improved precision and dexterity, tremor elimination and improved visualization. The present article aims to delineate the dynamics of patient preparation and surgical team, surgical technique and postoperative care. The oncological outcomes and disease-free survival of partial nephrectomy have been found to be equivalent to open partial nephrectomy [1–4].