M.S. and M.B. contributed equally to the work.
Comparison of partial vs radical nephrectomy with regard to other-cause mortality in T1 renal cell carcinoma among patients aged ≥75 years with multiple comorbidities
Article first published online: 22 MAY 2012
© 2012 BJU International
Volume 111, Issue 1, pages 67–73, January 2013
How to Cite
Sun, M., Bianchi, M., Trinh, Q.-D., Hansen, J., Abdollah, F., Hanna, N., Tian, Z., Shariat, S. F., Montorsi, F., Perrotte, P. and Karakiewicz, P. I. (2013), Comparison of partial vs radical nephrectomy with regard to other-cause mortality in T1 renal cell carcinoma among patients aged ≥75 years with multiple comorbidities. BJU International, 111: 67–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11254.x
- Issue published online: 20 DEC 2012
- Article first published online: 22 MAY 2012
- the University of Montreal Department of Surgery and the University of Montreal Health Center (CHUM) Foundation
- localized renal cell carcinoma;
What's known on the subject? and What does the study add?
- Surgical intervention is the established standard of care option in patients diagnosed with localized RCC.
- The study found that better and rigorous selection of surgical candidates should be implemented in the context of localized RCC as some patients may not benefit from surgery.
- To quantify the effect of partial nephrectomy (PN) vs radical nephrectomy (RN) on other-cause mortality (OCM) in elderly patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and/or multiple comorbidities.
- Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare-linked database, patients with T1 RCC, aged ≥75 years, or who had ≥2 comorbidities, were identified (1988–2005).
- To adjust for inherent differences between treatment types, propensity-based matched analyses were performed.
- Competing-risks regression analyses for prediction of OCM were assessed according to treatment type.
- The effect of PN and RN on OCM was examined in three sub-groups: patients aged ≥75 years; patients with ≥2 comorbidities; and patients aged ≥75 years with ≥2 comorbidities.
- After propensity-based matched analyses and adjustment for all covariates, PN was found to exert a protective effect relative to RN with respect to OCM in all patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.84, P = 0.048).
- In subanalyses, no difference was recorded between PN and RN in patients who were aged ≥75 years (HR: 0.83, P = 0.2), with ≥2 baseline comorbidities at diagnosis (HR: 0.83, P = 0.1), or in patients who were aged ≥75 years and who had ≥2 baseline comorbidities (HR: 0.77, P = 0.2).
- Some elderly patients and/or those with multiple comorbidities at diagnosis may not benefit from PN with respect to OCM.
- After rigorous patient selection, alternative treatment options could be considered.