• 1
    Autorino R, Cadeddu JA, Desai MM et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 2011; 59: 2645
  • 2
    Zorron R, Palanivelu C, Galvão Neto MP et al. International multicenter trial on clinical natural orifice surgery – NOTES IMTN study: preliminary results of 362 patients. Surg Innov 2010; 17: 14258
  • 3
    Alcaraz A, Musquera M, Peri L et al. Feasibility of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted living donor nephrectomy: is kidney vaginal delivery the approach of the future? Eur Urol 2011; 59: 101925
  • 4
    Targarona EM, Gomez C, Rovira R et al. NOTES-assisted transvaginal splenectomy: the next step in the minimally invasive approach to the spleen. Surg Innov 2009; 16: 21822
  • 5
    Kaouk JH, Autorino R, Kim FJ et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology: worldwide multi-institutional analysis of 1076 cases. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 9981005
  • 6
    Pfluke JM, Parker M, Stauffer JA et al. Laparoscopic surgery performed through a single incision: a systematic review of the current literature. J Am Coll Surg 2011; 212: 1138
  • 7
    Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Morra I, Scarpa RM. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted minilaparoscopic nephrectomy: a step towards scarless surgery. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 8626
  • 8
    Pini G, Goezen AS, Schulze M, Hruza M, Klein J, Rassweiler JJ. Small-incision access retroperitoneoscopic technique (SMART) pyeloplasty in adult patients: comparison of cosmetic and post-operative pain outcomes in a matched-pair analysis with standard retroperitoneoscopy: preliminary report. World J Urol 2011; doi:10.1007/s00345-011-0740-x. [Epub ahead of print]
  • 9
    Stroup SP, Bazzi W, Derweesh IH. Training for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. BJU Int 2010; 106: 93440
  • 10
    Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG et al. A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 2005; 190: 10713
  • 11
    Bucher P, Pugin F, Ostermann S, Ris F, Chilcott M, Morel P. Population perception of surgical safety and body image trauma: a plea for scarless surgery? Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 40815
  • 12
    Omana JJ, Mistry S, Herron D, Kini S. Perception of NOTES among health care workers and medical students. Surg Innov 2010; 17: 638
  • 13
    Islam A, Castellvi AO, Tesfay ST et al. Early surgeon impressions and technical difficulty associated with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: a Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons learning center study. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 2597603
  • 14
    Haber GP, Autorino R, Laydner H et al. SPIDER Surgical system for urologic procedures with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: from initial laboratory experience to first clinical application. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 41522
  • 15
    Montero PN, Acker CE, Heniford BT, Stefanidis D. Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is associated with poorer performance and increased surgeon workload compared with standard laparoscopy. Am Surg 2011; 77: 737
  • 16
    Strickland AD, Norwood MG, Behnia-Willison F et al. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a survey of women's views on a new technique. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 242431
  • 17
    Peterson CY, Ramamoorthy S, Andrews B et al. Women's positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery. Surg Endosc 2009; 3: 17704