SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Walsh PC, Marschke P, Ricker D, Burnett AL. Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2000; 55: 5861
  • 2
    Noldus J, Michl U, Graefen M, Haese A, Hammerer P, Huland H. Patient-reported sexual function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2002; 42: 118124
  • 3
    Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology 2002; 60: 864868
  • 4
    Walsh PC. Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. In Walsh PC , Retik AB , Vaughan ED , Wein AJ eds, Campbell's Urology, 8th edn, Vol. 4, Chapt. 90, Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 2002: 31073129
  • 5
    Sung WS, Lee S, Park YK, Chang SG. Neuroanatomical study of periprostatic nerve distributions using human cadaver prostate. J Korean Med Sci 2010; 25: 608612
  • 6
    Tewari A, Takenaka A, Mtui E et al. The proximal neurovascular plate and the tri-zonal neural architecture around the prostate gland: importance in the athermal robotic technique of nerve-sparing prostatectomy. BJU Int 2006; 98: 314323
  • 7
    Shikanov S, Woo J, Al-Ahmadie H et al. Extrafascial versus interfascial nerve-sparing technique for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: comparison of functional outcomes and positive surgical margins characteristics. Urology 2009; 74: 611616
  • 8
    Zorn KC, Gofrit ON, Steinberg GP, Taxy JB, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL. Planned nerve preservation to reduce positive surgical margins during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 2008; 22: 13031309
  • 9
    Stolzenburg JU, Rebenalt R, Tannapfel A, Liatsikos EN. Intrafascial nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Urology 2006; 67: 1721
  • 10
    Savera AT, Kaul S, Badani K, Stark AT, Shah NL, Menon M. Robotic radical prostatectomy with the ‘Veil of Aphrodite’ technique: histologic evidence of enhanced nerve sparing. Eur Urol 2006; 49: 10651073
  • 11
    Kiyoshima K, Yokomizo A, Yoshida T et al. Anatomical features of periprostatic tissue and its surroundings: a histological analysis of 79 radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2004; 34: 463468
  • 12
    McNeal JE. Normal histology of the prostate. Am J Surg Pathol 1998; 12: 619633
  • 13
    Raychaudhuri B, Cahill D. Pelvic fasciae in urology. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2008; 90: 633637
  • 14
    Ishidoya S, Endoh M, Nakagawa H, Sato S, Arai Y. Novel anatomical findings of the prostatic gland and the surrounding capsular structures in the normal prostate. Tohoku J Exp Med 2007; 212: 5562
  • 15
    Tewari A, Peabody JO, Fischer M et al. An operative and anatomic study to help in nerve sparing during laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2003; 43: 444454
  • 16
    Ayala AG, Ro JY, Babaian R, Troncoso P, Grignon DJ. The prostatic capsule: does it exist? Its importance in the staging and treatment of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1989; 13: 2127
  • 17
    Sattar AA, Noël JC, Vanderhaeghen JJ, Schulman CC, Wespes E. Prostate capsule: computerized morphometric analysis of its components. Urology 1995; 46: 178181
  • 18
    Emerson RE, Koch MO, Daggy JK, Cheng L. Closest distance between tumor and resection margin in radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prognostic significance. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29: 225229
  • 19
    Kaul S, Bhandari A, Hemal A, Savera A, Shrivastava A, Menon M. Robotic radical prostatectomy with preservation of the prostatic fascia: a feasibility study. Urology 2005; 66: 12611265
  • 20
    Powers TW, Bentrem DJ, Nagle AP, Toyama MT, Murphy SA, Murayama KM. Hand dominance and performance in a laparoscopic skills curriculum. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 673677
  • 21
    Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Rosenberg J. Impact of hand dominance, gender, and experience with computer games on performance in virtual reality laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 10821085