SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Fernstrom I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1976; 10: 257259
  • 2
    Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE et al. Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 2005; 173: 19912000
  • 3
    Labate G, Modi P, Timoney A et al. The percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: classification of complications. J Endourol 2011; 25: 12751280
  • 4
    Segura JW, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ et al. Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1000 cases. J Urol 1985; 134: 10771081
  • 5
    Stoller M, Wolf JS Jr, St Lezin MA. Estimated blood loss and transfusion rates associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 1994; 152: 19771981
  • 6
    Lee WJ, Smith AD, Cubelli V et al. Complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 148: 177180
  • 7
    Jones DJ, Russell GL, Kellett MJ, Wickham JE. The changing practice of percutaneous stone surgery. Review of 1000 cases 1981–1988. Br J Urol 1990; 66: 15
  • 8
    Chibber PJ. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large and staghorn calculi. J Endourol 1993; 7: 293295
  • 9
    Turna B, Nazli O, Demiryoguran S, Mammadov R. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: variables that influence hemorrhage. Urology 2007; 69: 603607
  • 10
    Liatsikos EN, Kallidonis P, Stolzenburg JU et al. Percutaneous management of staghorn calculi in horseshoe kidneys: a multi-institutional experience. J Endourol 2010; 24: 531536
  • 11
    Dindo D, Dermatines N, Clavien P. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205213
  • 12
    Clavien PA, Sanabrai JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 1992; 111: 518526
  • 13
    Armitage JN, Irving SO, Burgess N, British Association of Urological Surgeons Section of Endourology. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the United Kingdom: results of a prospective data registry. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 11881193
  • 14
    Shuba D, Thavasseelan S, Pareek G, Haleblian G. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the septuagenarian, octogenarian and nonagenarian is safe: outcomes and complications. J Urol 2011; 185: e731
  • 15
    Aron M, Yadav R, Goel R et al. Multi-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large complete staghorn calculi. Urol Int 2005; 75: 327332
  • 16
    Guohua Z, Zhong W, Li X et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: A novel single session approach via multiple 14–18 Fr tracts. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2007; 17: 124128
  • 17
    Hegarty NJ, Desai MM. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy requiring multiple tracts: comparison of morbidity with single-tract procedures. J Endourol 2006; 20: 753760
  • 18
    Singla M, Srivastava A, Kapoor R et al. Aggressive approach to staghorn calculi – safety and efficacy of multiple tracts percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 2008; 71: 10391042
  • 19
    Martin X, Tajara LC, Gelet A et al. Complete staghorn stones: percutaneous approach using one or more multiple accesses. J Endourol 1999; 13: 367
  • 20
    Soucy F, Ko R, Duvdevani M et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: a single centre's experience over 15 years. J Endourol 2009; 10: 16691673
  • 21
    de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M et al. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol 2011; 25: 1117
  • 22
    Yamaguchi A, Skolarikos A, Buchholz NN et al. Operating times and bleeding complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparison of tract dilation methods in 5537 patients in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study. J Endourol 2011; 25: 933939
  • 23
    Bucuras V, Gopalakrishnan G, Wolf JS et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with a solitary kidney: comparing characteristics and outcomes. J Urol 2011; 185 (Suppl.): e772773
  • 24
    Osther P, Razvi H, Liatsikos E et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with renal anomalies: comparing characteristics and outcome. J Urol 2011; 185 (Suppl.): e773
  • 25
    Wezel F, Mamouklakis C, Rioja J et al. Two contemporary series of percutaneous tract dilation for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2009; 23: 16651
  • 26
    Martin X, Murat FJ, Feitosa LC et al. Severe bleeding after nephrolithotomy; results of hyperselective embolisation. Eur Urol 2000; 37: 136139
  • 27
    Kessaris DN, Bellman GC, Pardalidis NP, Smith AD. Management of haemorrhage after percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 1995; 153: 604608
  • 28
    Zimmermanns V, Liske P, Lahme S. Minimally invasive PCNL (MPCNL) -proven efficiency and safety after more than 650 consecutive patients. J Urol 2011; 185 (Suppl.): e772
  • 29
    Valdivia Uria JG, Valle Gerhold J, López López JA et al. Technique and complications of percutaneous nephrolithoscopy: experience with 557 patients in the supine position. J Urol 1998; 160: 19751978
  • 30
    De Sio M, Autorino R, Quarto G. Modified supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones treatable with a single percutaneous access: a prospective randomized trial. Eur Urol 2008; 54: 196203
  • 31
    De la Rosette JJ, Tsakiris P, Ferradino MN, Elsakka AM, Rioja J, Preminger GM. Beyond prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comprehensive review. Eur Urol 2008; 54: 12621269
  • 32
    Srirangam SJ, Darling R, Stopford M, Neilson D. Contemporary practice of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: review of practice in a single region of the UK. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2008; 90: 4044