X.F., K.X. and T. L. contributed equally to this study.
Robotics and Laparoscopy
Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Article first published online: 29 OCT 2012
© 2012 BJU International
Volume 111, Issue 4, pages 611–621, April 2013
How to Cite
Fan, X., Xu, K., Lin, T., Liu, H., Yin, Z., Dong, W., Huang, H. and Huang, J. (2013), Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU International, 111: 611–621. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11598.x
- Issue published online: 2 APR 2013
- Article first published online: 29 OCT 2012
- National Natural Science Foundation of China. Grant Numbers: 81001138, 81071688, 81172431, 81272808
- Guangdong Province Natural Scientific Foundation. Grant Numbers: 07117336, 10151008901000024
Table S1 Risk of bias in the prospective RCTs.
Table S2 Risk of bias in the observational studies using modified Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.