• 1
    Mellinger GT, Gleason D, Bailar J 3rd. The histology and prognosis of prostatic cancer. J Urol 1967; 97: 331337
  • 2
    Gleason DF, Mellinger GT. Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging. J Urol 1974; 111: 5864
  • 3
    Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB, Egevad LL. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29: 12281242
  • 4
    Billis A, Guimaraes MS, Freitas LL et al. The impact of the 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsies. J Urol 2008; 180: 548552; discussion 552–3
  • 5
    Helpap B, Egevad L. The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. Virchows Arch 2006; 449: 622627
  • 6
    Ozok HU, Sagnak L, Tuygun C et al. Will the modification of the Gleason grading system affect the urology practice? Int J Surg Pathol 2010; 18: 248254
  • 7
    Tsivian M, Sun L, Mouraviev V et al. Changes in Gleason score grading and their effect in predicting outcome after radical prostatectomy. Urology 2009; 74: 10901093
  • 8
    Uemura H, Hoshino K, Sasaki T et al. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. BJU Int 2009; 103: 11901194
  • 9
    Berney DM, Fisher G, Kattan MW et al. Major shifts in the treatment and prognosis of prostate cancer due to changes in pathological diagnosis and grading. BJU Int 2007; 100: 12401244
  • 10
    Trock BJ, Guo CC, Gonzalgo ML et al. Tertiary Gleason patterns and biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy: proposal for a modified Gleason scoring system. J Urol 2009; 182: 13641370
  • 11
    Epstein JI, Pizov G, Walsh PC. Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer 1993; 71: 35823593
  • 12
    Latour M, Amin MB, Billis A et al. Grading of invasive cribriform carcinoma on prostate needle biopsy: an interobserver study among experts in genitourinary pathology. Am J Surg Pathol 2008; 32: 15321539
  • 13
    Iczkowski KA, Torkko KC, Kotnis GR et al. Digital quantification of five high-grade prostate cancer patterns, including the cribriform pattern, and their association with adverse outcome. Am J Clin Pathol 2011; 136: 98107
  • 14
    Miyamoto H, Hernandez DJ, Epstein JI. A pathological reassessment of organ-confined, Gleason score 6 prostatic adenocarcinomas that progress after radical prostatectomy. Hum Pathol 2009; 40: 16931698
  • 15
    Alenda O, Ploussard G, Mouracade P et al. Impact of the primary Gleason pattern on biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy: a single-center cohort of 1,248 patients with Gleason 7 tumors. World J Urol 2010; 29: 671676
  • 16
    Burdick MJ, Reddy CA, Ulchaker J et al. Comparison of biochemical relapse-free survival between primary Gleason score 3 and primary Gleason score 4 for biopsy Gleason score 7 prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 73: 14391445
  • 17
    Chan TY, Partin AW, Walsh PC, Epstein JI. Prognostic significance of Gleason score 3+4 versus Gleason score 4+3 tumor at radical prostatectomy. Urology 2000; 56: 823827
  • 18
    Herman CM, Kattan MW, Ohori M, Scardino PT, Wheeler TM. Primary Gleason pattern as a predictor of disease progression in gleason score 7 prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis of 823 men treated with radical prostatectomy. Am J Surg Pathol 2001; 25: 657660
  • 19
    Kang DE, Fitzsimons NJ, Presti JC Jr et al. Risk stratification of men with Gleason score 7 to 10 tumors by primary and secondary Gleason score: results from the SEARCH database. Urology 2007; 70: 277282
  • 20
    Koontz BF, Tsivian M, Mouraviev V et al. Impact of primary Gleason grade on risk stratification for Gleason score 7 prostate cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 82: 200203
  • 21
    Makarov DV, Sanderson H, Partin AW, Epstein JI. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores? J Urol 2002; 167: 24402442
  • 22
    Rasiah KK, Stricker PD, Haynes AM et al. Prognostic significance of Gleason pattern in patients with Gleason score 7 prostate carcinoma. Cancer 2003; 98: 25602565
  • 23
    Sabolch A, Feng FY, Daignault-Newton S et al. Gleason pattern 5 is the greatest risk factor for clinical failure and death from prostate cancer after dose-escalated radiation therapy and hormonal ablation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 81: e351360
  • 24
    Pan CC, Potter SR, Partin AW, Epstein JI. The prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason patterns of higher grade in radical prostatectomy specimens: a proposal to modify the Gleason grading system. Am J Surg Pathol 2000; 24: 563569
  • 25
    Mosse CA, Magi-Galluzzi C, Tsuzuki T, Epstein JI. The prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in radical prostatectomy specimens. Am J Surg Pathol 2004; 28: 394398
  • 26
    Turker P, Bas E, Bozkurt S et al. Presence of high grade tertiary Gleason pattern upgrades the Gleason sum score and is inversely associated with biochemical recurrence-free survival. Urol Oncol 2011; [Epub ahead of print]
  • 27
    Whittemore DE, Hick EJ, Carter MR et al. Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason score 7 radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 2008; 179: 516522; discussion 522
  • 28
    Amin A, Partin A, Epstein JI. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: relation of primary pattern 3 or 4 to pathological stage and progression after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2011; 186: 12861290