SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. Eur Urol 2011; 59: 6171
  • 2
    Campbell SC, Klein EA, Levin HS, Piedmonte MR. Open pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: a reassessment. Urology 1995; 46: 352355
  • 3
    Musch M, Klevecka V, Roggenbuck U, Kroepfl D. Complications of pelvic lymphadenectomy in 1380 patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy between 1993 and 2006. J Urol 2008; 179: 923928
  • 4
    Novara G, Ficarra V, D'Elia C, Secco S, Cavalleri S, Artibani W. Prospective evaluation with standardised criteria for postoperative complications after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 363370
  • 5
    Gotto GT, Yunis LH, Guillonneau B et al. Predictors of symptomatic lymphocele after radical prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection. Int J Urol 2011; 18: 291296
  • 6
    Pepper RJ, Pati J, Kaisary AV. The incidence and treatment of lymphoceles after radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int 2005; 95: 772775
  • 7
    Solberg A, Angelsen A, Bergan U, Haugen OA, Viset T, Klepp O. Frequency of lymphoceles after open and laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with prostate cancer. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2003; 37: 218221
  • 8
    Capitanio U, Pellucchi F, Gallina A et al. How can we predict lymphorrhoea and clinically significant lymphocoeles after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy? Clinical implications. BJU Int 2011; 107: 10951101
  • 9
    Briganti A, Chun FK, Salonia A et al. Complications and other surgical outcomes associated with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2006; 50: 10061013
  • 10
    Naselli A, Andreatta R, Introini C, Fontana V, Puppo P. Predictors of symptomatic lymphocele after lymph node excision and radical prostatectomy. Urology 2010; 75: 630635
  • 11
    Araki M, Manoharan M, Vyas S, Nieder AM, Soloway MS. A pelvic drain can often be avoided after radical retropubic prostatectomy – an update in 552 cases. Eur Urol 2006; 50: 12411247
  • 12
    Merad F, Yahchouchi E, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Laborde Y, Langlois-Zantain O. Prophylactic abdominal drainage after elective colonic resection and suprapromontory anastomosis: a multicenter study controlled by randomization. French Associations for Surgical Research. Arch Surg 1998; 133: 309314
  • 13
    Patsner B. Closed-suction drainage versus no drainage following radical abdominal hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage IB cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1995; 57: 232234
  • 14
    Savoie M, Soloway MS, Kim SS, Manoharan M. A pelvic drain may be avoided after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 2003; 170: 112114
  • 15
    Sharma S, Kim HL, Mohler JL. Routine pelvic drainage not required after open or robotic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2007; 69: 330333
  • 16
    Walsh PC. Radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer provides durable cancer control with excellent quality of life: a structured debate. J Urol 2000; 163: 18021807
  • 17
    Bader P, Burkhard FC, Markwalder R, Studer UE. Is a limited lymph node dissection an adequate staging procedure for prostate cancer? J Urol 2002; 168: 514518
  • 18
    Mattei A, Naspro R, Annino F, Burke D, Guida R Jr, Gaston R. Tension and energy-free robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with interfascial dissection of the neurovascular bundles. Eur Urol 2007; 52: 687694
  • 19
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205213
  • 20
    Williams SK, Rabbani F. Complications of lymphadenectomy in urologic surgery. Urol Clin North Am 2011; 38: 507518
  • 21
    Briganti A, Blute ML, Eastham JH et al. Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2009; 55: 12511265
  • 22
    Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Rocco B et al. Early complication rates in a single-surgeon series of 2500 robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies: report applying a standardized grading system. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 945952
  • 23
    Vallancien G, Cathelineau X, Baumert H, Doublet JD, Guillonneau B. Complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery in urology: review of 1311 procedures at a single center. J Urol 2002; 168: 2326
  • 24
    Orvieto MA, Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Palmer KJ, Rocco B, Patel VR. Incidence of lymphoceles after robot-assisted pelvic lymph node dissection. BJU Int 2011; 108: 11851190
  • 25
    Clark T, Parekh DJ, Cookson MS et al. Randomized prospective evaluation of extended versus limited lymph node dissection in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 2003; 169: 145147
  • 26
    Bigg SW, Catalona WJ. Prophylactic mini-dose heparin in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. A prospective trial. Urology 1992; 39: 309313
  • 27
    Sieber PR, Rommel FM, Agusta VE et al. Is heparin contraindicated in pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical prostatectomy? J Urol 1997; 158: 869871
  • 28
    Kropfl D, Krause R, Hartung R, Pfeiffer R, Behrendt H. Subcutaneous heparin injection in the upper arm as a method of avoiding lymphoceles after lymphadenectomies in the lower part of the body. Urol Int 1987; 42: 416423
  • 29
    Hautmann RE, Sauter TW, Wenderoth UK. Radical retropubic prostatectomy: morbidity and urinary continence in 418 consecutive cases. Urology 1994; 43 (Suppl. 2): 4751
  • 30
    Noldus J, Hammerer P, Graefen M, Huland H. Surgical therapy for localized prostatic carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1997; 123: 180184
  • 31
    Fong Y, Brennan MF, Brown K, Heffernan N, Blumgart LH. Drainage is unnecessary after elective liver resection. Am J Surg 1996; 171: 158162
  • 32
    Scuderi GJ, Brusovanik GV, Fitzhenry LN, Vaccaro AR. Is wound drainage necessary after lumbar spinal fusion surgery? Med Sci Monit 2005; 11: CR6466
  • 33
    Chung JS, Kim WT, Ham WS et al. Comparison of oncological results, functional outcomes, and complications for transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon's experience. J Endourol 2010; 29: 787792
  • 34
    Porpiglia F, Terrone C, Tarabuzzi R et al. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience of a single center. Urology 2006; 68: 376380
  • 35
    Zorn KC, Katz MH, Bernstein A et al. Pelvic lymphadenectomy during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: assessing nodal yield, perioperative outcomes, and complications. Urology 2009; 74: 296302
  • 36
    Stolzenburg JU, Wasserscheid J, Rabenalt R et al. Reduction in incidence of lymphocele following extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection by bilateral peritoneal fenestration. World J Urol 2008; 26: 581586
  • 37
    Meijer RP, Nunnink CJ, Wassenaar AE et al. Standard lymph node dissection for bladder cancer: significant variability in the number of reported lymph nodes. J Urol 2012; 187: 446450
  • 38
    Simonato A, Varca V, Esposito M, Venzano F, Carmignani G. The use of a surgical patch in the prevention of lymphoceles after extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer: a randomized prospective pilot study. J Urol 2009; 182: 22852290