• 1
    2011 Annual Report of the U.S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Healthcare Systems Bureau, Division of Transplantation, Rockville, MD; United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA; University Renal Research and Education Association, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • 2
    Nicholson ML, Kaushik M, Lewis GR et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 2128
  • 3
    Nanidis TG, Antcliffe D, Kokkinos C et al. Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy in renal transplantation: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2008; 247: 5870
  • 4
    Park SK, Olweny EO, Best SL, Tracy CR, Mir SA, Cadeddu JA. Patient-reported body image and cosmesis outcomes following kidney surgery: comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site, laparoscopic, and open surgery. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 10971104
  • 5
    Schulam PG, Kavoussi LR, Cheriff AD et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the initial 3 cases. J Urol 1996; 155: 18571859
  • 6
    Levey HR, Rais-Bahrami S, Richstone L, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a technical road map. J Endourol 2011; 25: 201208
  • 7
    Gimenez E, Leeser DB, Wysock JS, Charlton M, Kapur S, Del Pizzo JJ. Laparoendoscopic single site live donor nephrectomy: initial experience. J Urol 2010; 184: 20492053
  • 8
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205213
  • 9
    Dunn JF, Nylander WA Jr, Richie RE, Johnson HK, MacDonell RC Jr, Sawyers JL. Living related kidney donors. A 14-year experience. Ann Surg 1986; 203: 637643
  • 10
    Waples MJ, Belzer FO, Uehling DT. Living donor nephrectomy: a 20-year experience. Urology 1995; 45: 207210
  • 11
    Kuo PC, Johnson LB. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy increases the supply of living donor kidneys: a center-specific microeconomic analysis. Transplantation 2000; 69: 22112213
  • 12
    Gill IS, Canes D, Aron M et al. Single port transumbilical (E-NOTES) donor nephrectomy. J Urol 2008; 180: 637641; discussion 41
  • 13
    Canes D, Berger A, Aron M et al. Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 95101
  • 14
    Wang GJ, Afaneh C, Aull M et al. Laparoendoscopic single site live donor nephrectomy: single institution report of initial 100 cases. J Urol 2011; 186: 23332337
  • 15
    Kurien A, Rajapurkar S, Sinha L et al. First prize: standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy: a randomized comparative study. J Endourol 2011; 25: 365370
  • 16
    Andonian S, Rais-Bahrami S, Atalla MA, Herati AS, Richstone L, Kavoussi LR. Laparoendoscopic single-site Pfannenstiel versus standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. J Endourol 2010; 24: 429432
  • 17
    Kaouk JH, Autorino R, Kim FJ et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology: worldwide multi-institutional analysis of 1076 cases. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 9981005
  • 18
    Fahlenkamp D, Rassweiler J, Fornara P, Frede T, Loening SA. Complications of laparoscopic procedures in urology: experience with 2,407 procedures at 4 German centers. J Urol 1999; 162: 765770; discussion 70–1
  • 19
    Permpongkosol S, Link RE, Su LM et al. Complications of 2775 urological laparoscopic procedures: 1993 to 2005. J Urol 2007; 177: 580585
  • 20
    Soulie M, Salomon L, Seguin P et al. Multi-institutional study of complications in 1085 laparoscopic urologic procedures. Urology 2001; 58: 899903