National guidelines for psychological care in diabetes: how mindful have we been?
Article first published online: 27 FEB 2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02701.x
© 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2009 Diabetes UK
Additional Information
How to Cite
Nicholson, T. R. J., Taylor, J.-P., Gosden, C., Trigwell, P. and Ismail, K. (2009), National guidelines for psychological care in diabetes: how mindful have we been?. Diabetic Medicine, 26: 447–450. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02701.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 6 APR 2009
- Article first published online: 27 FEB 2009
- Accepted 10 February 2009
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- consultation–liaison psychiatry;
- diabetes;
- health services;
- psychology;
- survey
Abstract
Aims To assess the availability and types of psychological services for people with diabetes in the UK, compliance with national guidelines and skills of the diabetes team in, and attitudes towards, psychological aspects of diabetes management.
Methods Postal questionnaires to team leads (doctor and nurse) of all UK diabetes centres (n = 464) followed by semi-structured telephone interviews of expert providers of psychological services identified by team leads.
Results Two hundred and sixty-seven centres (58%) returned postal questionnaires; 66 (25%) identified a named expert provider of psychological services, of whom 53 (80%) were interviewed by telephone. Less than one-third (n = 84) of responding centres had access to specialist psychological services and availability varied across the four UK nations (P = 0.02). Over two-thirds (n = 182) of centres had not implemented the majority of national guidelines and only 2.6% met all guidelines. Psychological input into teams was associated with improved training in psychological issues for team members (P < 0.001), perception of better skills in managing more complex psychological issues (P ≤ 0.01) and increased likelihood of having psychological care pathways (P ≤ 0.05). Most (81%) expert providers interviewed by telephone were under-resourced to meet the psychological needs of their population.
Conclusions Expert psychological support is not available to the majority of diabetes centres and significant geographical variation indicates inequity of service provision. Only a minority of centres meet national guidelines. Skills and services within diabetes teams vary widely and are positively influenced by the presence of expert providers of psychological care. Lack of resources are a barrier to service provision.

1464-5491/asset/dme_left.gif?v=1&s=709479eec257345efd8869220bba03cf955b1626)
1464-5491/asset/dme_right.gif?v=1&s=5ab89a93bea1edfb131e4785d6bd3738828d7357)
