Distances to on- and off-premise alcohol outlets and experiences of alcohol-related amenity problems
Article first published online: 15 SEP 2011
© 2011 Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and other Drugs
Drug and Alcohol Review
Volume 31, Issue 4, pages 394–401, June 2012
How to Cite
WILKINSON, C. and LIVINGSTON, M. (2012), Distances to on- and off-premise alcohol outlets and experiences of alcohol-related amenity problems. Drug and Alcohol Review, 31: 394–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00346.x
- Issue published online: 5 JUN 2012
- Article first published online: 15 SEP 2011
- Received 20 January 2011; accepted for publication 11 July 2011.
- alcohol drinking;
- amenity problem;
- alcohol outlet;
Introduction and Aims. There are a number of studies in recent years that have examined the relationship of alcohol outlets to the incidence of alcohol-related problems. Only a small number of these studies examine the types of alcohol-related problems which may be considered amenity problems, such as neighbourhood disturbance, litter and noise. This paper examines the association between the proximity of someone's home to alcohol outlets and their experience of public amenity problems.
Design and Methods. Data came from an Australian general population survey: the Alcohol's Harm to Others Survey (2008). Two thousand six hundred and forty-nine Australians aged 18 years and over were asked about their experiences of a number of amenity-type problems and the distance they lived to the nearest on- and off-premise alcohol outlet.
Results. Bivariate results showed that respondents living closer to on- and off-premise outlets reported more problems, with minor differences by distance to on- and off-premise outlet. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, controlling for possible confounding effects of the respondent and neighbourhood characteristics, living closer to on-premise outlets was independently associated with reporting being kept awake or disturbed at night and living closer to an off-premise outlet was independently associated with reporting property damage.
Discussion and Conclusions. A possible interpretation of the results is that respondents living close to on- and off-premise outlets experience more amenity problems than those living further away, but that these experiences are concentrated among demographic groups who live in these areas. Direction of influence cannot be inferred from these cross-sectional findings.[Wilkinson C, Livingston M. Distances to on- and off-premise alcohol outlets and experiences of alcohol-related amenity problems. Drug Alcohol Rev 2012;31:394–401]