Get access

Clear criteria based on absolute risk: Reforming the basis of guidelines on low-risk drinking

Authors

  • ROBIN ROOM,

    Corresponding author
    1. School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    2. Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, Turning Point Alcohol & Drug Centre, Fitzroy, Australia
    3. Centre for Social Research on Alcohol & Drugs, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
      Robin Room PhD, Professor, Jürgen Rehm PhD, Professor. Dr Robin Room, Turning Point Alcohol & Drug Centre, 54-62 Gertrude Street, Fitzroy, Vic. 3065, Australia. Tel: +61 (0)3 8413 8430; Fax: +61 (0)3 9416 3420; E-mail: robinr@turningpoint.org.au
    Search for more papers by this author
  • JÜRGEN REHM

    1. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Canada
    2. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    3. Institute for Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Search for more papers by this author

Robin Room PhD, Professor, Jürgen Rehm PhD, Professor. Dr Robin Room, Turning Point Alcohol & Drug Centre, 54-62 Gertrude Street, Fitzroy, Vic. 3065, Australia. Tel: +61 (0)3 8413 8430; Fax: +61 (0)3 9416 3420; E-mail: robinr@turningpoint.org.au

Abstract

Issues.The paper discusses the approach behind the Australian Guidelines to Reduce Health Risks from Drinking of 2009. The Guidelines involved a new approach to the central conundrum of low-risk drinking guidelines: how to set a guideline threshold on smooth risk curves.

Approach.The context of the 2009 Guidelines is discussed in terms of previous Australian guidelines and of risk analyses and threshold setting for other risks to health and well-being, such as environmental and food toxins. The Guidelines were accordingly based on new lifetime risk modelling of absolute risk, with specification of the risk attached to the guideline thresholds of 1 in 100 lifetime mortality risk. The Guidelines thus specify no more than two Australian standard drinks a day, and no more than four drinks on any occasion.

Implications and Conclusions.The approach described brings alcohol guidelines within a general analytical frame of guidelines and standards for hazards to health. At the level of 1 in 100 lifetime risk, there is little justification for different guidelines for men and women. On grounds of differential risk, separate guidelines for young adults might be considered, but could not be based on lifetime risk.[Room R, Rehm J. Clear criteria based on absolute risk: Reforming the basis of guidelines on low-risk drinking. Drug Alcohol Rev 2012;31:135–140]

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary