WHY DON'T ELIGIBLE FIRMS CLAIM HIRING SUBSIDIES? THE ROLE OF JOB DURATION
Article first published online: 16 MAR 2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00260.x
© 2010 Western Economic Association International
Additional Information
How to Cite
HAMERSMA, S. (2011), WHY DON'T ELIGIBLE FIRMS CLAIM HIRING SUBSIDIES? THE ROLE OF JOB DURATION. Economic Inquiry, 49: 916–934. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00260.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 16 MAR 2010
- Article first published online: 16 MAR 2010
- Online Early publication March 16, 2010
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Only a small fraction of firms that hire disadvantaged workers claim the federal subsidies for which they qualify, namely, the Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC) and Welfare-to-Work Tax Credit (WtW). Subsidy benefits depend partially on job duration, with higher subsidy rates above certain job-duration thresholds. I estimate the relationship between a firm's WOTC/WtW participation and its eligible workers' job durations. Using unique Wisconsin administrative data, I find that workers' subsidy rates (determined by hours worked) have the expected relationship to participation: Firms with a larger fraction of workers exceeding the programs' job-duration thresholds are more likely to claim the WOTC/WtW. I also find no evidence that firms systematically modify the job duration of their workers to maximize subsidy payments. (JEL J3)

1465-7295/asset/ECIN_left.gif?v=1&s=7d9f2dd38b9efd4d8a82a98dabd804476ddccc63)
1465-7295/asset/ECIN_right.gif?v=1&s=e87ebee817d893ae7dfc6cb9a1375003451ee28d)
