Get access

Beyond Rapoport's rule: evaluating range size patterns of New World birds in a two-dimensional framework

Authors

  • Bradford A. Hawkins,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA and
    Search for more papers by this author
  • José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho

    1. Departamento de Biologia Geral, ICB, Universidade Federal de Goiás, CP 131, 74.001-970, Goiânia, and Departamento de Biologia, MCAS/PROPE, Universidade Católica de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil
    Search for more papers by this author

*Correspondence: Bradford A. Hawkins, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA. E-mail: bhawkins@uci.edu

ABSTRACT

Aim  To evaluate Rapoport's rule for New World birds in two-dimensional geographical space. We specifically test for a topography × climate interaction that predicts little difference in range sizes between lowlands and mountains in cold climates, whereas in the tropics, montane species have narrow ranges and lowland species have broad ranges.

Location  The western hemisphere.

Methods  We used digitized range maps of breeding birds to generate mean range sizes in grids of 27.5 × 27.5 km and 110 × 110 km across North and South America. We examined the geographical pattern with respect to range in elevation, mean temperature in the coldest month, their interaction, biome size and continental width, using model II analysis of variance, multiple regression and simple correlation.

Results  In northern latitudes species have broad ranges in both mountainous and flat areas. However, range sizes in the mountains and lowlands diverge southwards, with the most extreme differences in the tropics. Further, there are minimal differences in range sizes across latitudes in lowlands. The smallest mean ranges occur in the tropical Andes. Mean range sizes in north-central Canada, Central America and Argentina/Chile are also small, reflecting the narrowing of the continents in these areas. The best regression model explained 51% of the variation in mean range size.

Main conclusions  The two-dimensional range size pattern indicates that neither winter temperature nor annual variability in temperature strongly influences the distribution of range sizes directly; rather, climate influences bird range sizes indirectly via effects on habitat size. Also, macroclimate interacts with topographic relief across latitudes, generating sharp mesoscale habitat gradients in tropical mountains but not in high latitude mountains or in lowlands at any latitude. Birds respond to these habitat gradients, resulting in ‘latitudinal’ range size gradients in topographically complex landscapes but not in simple landscapes.

Ancillary