Get access

Reproductive output of invasive versus native plants

Authors

  • Robert A. B. Mason,

    Corresponding author
    1. Plant Invasion and Restoration Ecology Lab, Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW, 2109, Australia,
      *Correspondence: Robert A. B. Mason, Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia. E-mail: rob.mason.m@gmail.com
    Search for more papers by this author
    • Present address: Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia.

  • Julia Cooke,

    1. Plant Invasion and Restoration Ecology Lab, Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW, 2109, Australia,
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Angela T. Moles,

    1. Evolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, NSW, 2052, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Michelle R. Leishman

    1. Plant Invasion and Restoration Ecology Lab, Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW, 2109, Australia,
    Search for more papers by this author

*Correspondence: Robert A. B. Mason, Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia. E-mail: rob.mason.m@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

Aim  Propagule size and output are critical for the ability of a plant species to colonize new environments. If invasive species have a greater reproductive output than native species (via more and/or larger seeds), then they will have a greater dispersal and establishment ability. Previous comparisons within plant genera, families or environments have conflicted over the differences in reproductive traits between native and invasive species. We went beyond a genus-, family- or habitat-specific approach and analysed data for plant reproductive traits from the global literature, to investigate whether: (1) seed mass and production differ between the original and introduced ranges of invasive species; (2) seed mass and production differ between invasives and natives; and (3) invasives produce more seeds per unit seed mass than natives.

Location  Global.

Methods  We combined an existing data set of native plant reproductive data with a new data compilation for invasive species. We used t-tests to compare original and introduced range populations, two-way ANOVAs to compare natives and invasives, and an ANCOVA to examine the relationship between seed mass and production for natives and invasives. The ANCOVA was performed again incorporating phylogenetically independent contrasts to overcome any phylogenetic bias in the data sets.

Results  Neither seed mass nor seed production of invasive species differed between their introduced and original ranges. We found no significant difference in seed mass between invasives and natives after growth form had been accounted for. Seed production was greater for invasive species overall and within herb and woody growth forms. For a given seed mass, invasive species produced 6.7-fold (all species), 6.9-fold (herbs only) and 26.1-fold (woody species only) more seeds per individual per year than native species. The phylogenetic ANCOVA verified that this trend did not appear to be influenced by phylogenetic bias within either data set.

Main conclusions  This study provides the first global examination of both seed mass and production traits in native and invasive species. Invasive species express a strategy of greater seed production both overall and per unit seed mass compared with natives. The consequent increased likelihood of establishment from long-distance seed dispersal may significantly contribute to the invasiveness of many exotic species.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary