Hot, dry and different: Australian lizard richness is unlike that of mammals, amphibians and birds
Article first published online: 19 MAR 2010
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Volume 19, Issue 3, pages 386–396, May 2010
How to Cite
Powney, G. D., Grenyer, R., Orme, C. D. L., Owens, I. P. F. and Meiri, S. (2010), Hot, dry and different: Australian lizard richness is unlike that of mammals, amphibians and birds. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19: 386–396. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00521.x
- Issue published online: 9 APR 2010
- Article first published online: 19 MAR 2010
- cross-taxon congruence;
- environmental correlates;
- species richness
Aims (1) To map the species richness of Australian lizards and describe patterns of range size and species turnover that underlie them. (2) To assess the congruence in the species richness of lizards and other vertebrate groups. (3) To search for commonalities in the drivers of species richness in Australian vertebrates.
Methods We digitized lizard distribution data to generate gridded maps of species richness and β-diversity. Using similar maps for amphibians, mammals and birds, we explored the relationship between species richness and temperature, actual evapotranspiration, elevation and local elevation range. We used spatial eigenvector filtering and geographically weighted regression to explore geographical patterns and take spatial autocorrelation into account. We explored congruence between the species richness of vertebrate groups whilst controlling for environmental effects.
Results Lizard richness peaks in the central deserts (where β-diversity is low) and tropical north-east (where β-diversity is high). The intervening lowlands have low species richness and β-diversity. Generally, lizard richness is uncorrelated with that of other vertebrates but this low congruence is strongly spatially structured. Environmental models for all groups also show strong spatial heterogeneity. Lizard richness is predicted by different environmental factors from other vertebrates, being highest in dry and hot regions. Accounting for environmental drivers, lizard richness is weakly positively related to richness of other vertebrates, both at global and local scales.
Main conclusions Lizard species richness differs from that of other vertebrates. This difference is probably caused by differential responses to environmental gradients and different centres of diversification; there is little evidence for inter-taxon competition limiting lizard richness. Local variation in habitat diversity or evolutionary radiations may explain weak associations between taxa, after controlling for environmental variables. We strongly recommend that studies of variation in species richness examine and account for non-stationarity.