Present address: Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F), Senckenberganalage 25, D-60325 Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Projecting the future distribution of European potential natural vegetation zones with a generalized, tree species-based dynamic vegetation model
Article first published online: 12 DEC 2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00613.x
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Issue

Global Ecology and Biogeography
Special Issue: QUO VADIS, ECOSYSTEM? SCENARIOS AS A TOOL FOR LARGE-SCALE ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 21, Issue 1, pages 50–63, January 2012
Additional Information
How to Cite
Hickler, T., Vohland, K., Feehan, J., Miller, P. A., Smith, B., Costa, L., Giesecke, T., Fronzek, S., Carter, T. R., Cramer, W., Kühn, I. and Sykes, M. T. (2012), Projecting the future distribution of European potential natural vegetation zones with a generalized, tree species-based dynamic vegetation model. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 21: 50–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00613.x
- †
Present address: Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F), Senckenberganalage 25, D-60325 Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
- ‡
Present address: Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Research at the Humboldt-University Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, D-10115 Berlin.
- §
Present address: European Investment Bank (EIB), 100 Boulevard Konrad Adenauer, L-2950 Luxembourg.
Publication History
- Issue published online: 12 DEC 2011
- Article first published online: 12 DEC 2011
Keywords:
- Biodiversity;
- climate change;
- dynamic vegetation modelling;
- Europe;
- forest response;
- LPJ-GUESS;
- nature conservation;
- vegetation shifts
ABSTRACT
Aim To assess the extent to which climate change might cause changes in potential natural vegetation (PNV) across Europe.
Location Europe.
Method We parameterized a generalized dynamic vegetation model (LPJ-GUESS) for the most common European tree species, and, for the first time, modelled large-scale vegetation dynamics using a process-based model explicitly representing tree species, age cohorts, gap dynamics and biogeochemical cycles in a single framework. For projections, the model was driven with climate scenario data from two atmosphere–ocean general circulation models (AOGCMs), downscaled to 10 × 10′ spatial resolution (c. 18.5 × 12 km at 50° N).
Results At a general level, modelled present-day PNV corresponded better with an expert reconstruction of the PNV than most earlier plant functional type (PFT)-based simulations, but at a finer scale the model and the expert map showed substantial discrepancies in some areas. Simulations until 2085 showed considerable successional shifts in vegetation types in most areas: 31–42% of the total area of Europe was projected to be covered by a different vegetation type by the year 2085. In the long term, equilibrium changes are substantially larger: simulations with one climate scenario suggest that 76–80% of the European land surface could exist within another PNV if climate was stabilized by the end of the century and vegetation had unlimited time to achieve equilibrium with the new climate. ‘Hotspots’ of change include arctic and alpine ecosystems, where trees replace tundra in the model, and the transition zone between temperate broad-leaved and boreal conifer forest. In southern Europe, the model projected widespread shifts from forest to shrublands as a result of drought.
Main conclusions The model presents a considerable advance in modelling dynamic changes in natural vegetation across Europe. Climate change might cause substantial changes in PNV across Europe, which should be considered in the management of reserves and forestry.

1466-8238/asset/geb_left.gif?v=1&s=15b1d473a11c3861a1d4e7d1f6ff0f55ae7d7213)
1466-8238/asset/geb_right.gif?v=1&s=563b6526d05e28bb69ca94165466a0c0d6296780)