I would like to thank D. Dinnsen, H. Gradman, G. Iverson and G. Sanders for taking the time to discuss this topic with me, and for their comments and suggestions. Of course, any errors or inconsistencies are my own.
MARKEDNESS AND THE CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS HYPOTHESIS
Article first published online: 27 OCT 2006
© 1977 Language Learning Research Club, University of Michigan
Volume 27, Issue 2, pages 315–330, December 1977
How to Cite
Eckman, F. R. (1977), MARKEDNESS AND THE CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS HYPOTHESIS. Language Learning, 27: 315–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00124.x
- Issue published online: 27 OCT 2006
- Article first published online: 27 OCT 2006
The purpose of this paper is to propose that the Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis (CAH) should be revised to incorporate a notion of degree of difficulty. This notion corresponds to typological markedness which can be determined independently of any particular language and independently of the facts concerning second language acquisition. Moreover, it is argued that if typological markedness is incorporated into the CAH, it is possible to predict not only the areas of difficulty for a second language learner, but also the relative degree of difficulty. Finally, it is argued that given certain assumptions about language and human learning, typological markedness is a natural and highly plausible notion of difficulty.