SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aakvik, A. (2001) Bounding a matching estimator: the case of a Norwegian training program. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 63(1): 115143.
  • Abadie, A. (2003) Semiparametric instrumental variable estimation of treatment response models. Journal of Econometrics 113: 231263.
  • Abadie, A. (2005) Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators. Review of Economic Studies 72(1): 119.
    Direct Link:
  • Abadie, A. and Imbens, G. (2006a) Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica 74(1): 235267.
  • Abadie, A. and Imbens, G. (2006b) On the failure of the bootstrap for matching estimators. Working Paper, Harvard University .
  • Abadie, A., Drukker, D., Leber Herr, J. and Imbens, G. (2004) Implementing matching estimators for average treatment effects in STATA. Stata Journal 4(3): 290311.
  • Angrist, J. and Hahn, J. (2004) When to control for covariates? Panel-asymptotic results for estimates of treatment effects. Review of Economics and Statistics 86(1): 5872.
  • Augurzky, B. and Kluve, J. (2007) Assessing the performance of matching algorithms when selection into treatment is strong. Journal of Applied Econometrics 22(3): 533557.
  • Augurzky, B. and Schmidt, C. (2001) The propensity score: a means to an end. Discussion Paper No. 271, IZA.
  • Becker, S.O. (1964) Human Capital. New York : Columbia University Press.
  • Becker, S.O. and Ichino, A. (2002) Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. Stata Journal 2(4): 358377.
  • Becker, S.O. and Caliendo, M. (2007) Sensitivity analysis for average treatment effect. Stata Journal 7(1): 7183.
  • Bergemann, A., Fitzenberger, B. and Speckesser, S. (2001) Evaluating the employment effects of public sector sponsored training in East Germany: conditional difference-in-differences and Ashenfelters' dip. Discussion Paper, University of Mannheim.
  • Black, D. and Smith, J. (2004) How robust is the evidence on the effects of the college quality? Evidence from matching. Journal of Econometrics 121(1): 99124.
  • Blundell, R. and Costa Dias, M. (2000) Evaluation methods for non-experimental data. Fiscal Studies 21(4): 427468.
  • Blundell, R. and Costa Dias, M. (2002) Alternative approaches to evaluation in empirical microeconomics. Portuguese Economic Journal 1: 91115.
  • Blundell, R., Dearden, L. and Sianesi, B. (2005) Evaluating the impact of education on earnings in the UK: models, methods and results from the NCDS. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 168(3): 473512.
  • Brand, J.E. and Halaby, C.N. (2006) Regression and matching estimates of the effects of elite college attendance on educational and career achievement. Social Science Research, 35(3): 749770.
  • Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olsen, R. and Stone, C. (1984) Classification and Regression Trees. Belmont, CA : Wadsworth International Group.
  • Brodaty, T., Crepon, B. and Fougere, D. (2001) Using matching estimators to evaluate alternative youth employment programs: evidence from France, 1986–1988. In M.Lechner and F.Pfeiffer (eds), Econometric Evaluation of Labour Market Policies (pp. 85123). Heidelberg: Physica .
  • Brownstone, D. and Valletta, R. (2001) The bootstrap and multiple imputations: harnessing increased computing power for improved statistical tests. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(4): 129141.
  • Bryson, A. (2002) The union membership wage premium: an analysis using propensity score matching. Discussion Paper No. 530, Centre for Economic Performance, London .
  • Bryson, A., Dorsett, R. and Purdon, S. (2002) The use of propensity score matching in the evaluation of labour market policies. Working Paper No. 4, Department for Work and Pensions.
  • Caliendo, M. and Hujer, R. (2006) The microeconometric estimation of treatment effects – an overview. Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv 90(1): 197212.
  • Caliendo, M., Hujer, R. and Thomsen, S. (2007) The employment effects of job creation schemes in Germany – a microeconometric evaluation. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1512. Advances in Econometrics 21, forthcoming.
  • Cochran, W. (1968) The effectiveness of adjustment by subclassification in removing bias in observational studies. Biometrics 24: 295314.
  • Crump, R., Hotz, V., Imbens, G. and Mitnik, O. (2005) Moving the goalposts: addressing limited overlap in estimation of average treatment effects by changing the estimand. Working Paper, University of California at Berkeley .
  • Davies, R. and Kim, S. (2003) Matching and the estimated impact of interlisting. Discussion Paper in Finance No. 2001-11, ISMA Centre, Reading .
  • Dehejia, R. (2005) Practical propensity score matching: a reply to Smith and Todd. Journal of Econometrics 125: 355364.
  • Dehejia, R.H. and Wahba, S. (1999) Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: reevaluating the evaluation of training programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association 94(448): 10531062.
  • Dehejia, R.H. and Wahba, S. (2002) Propensity score matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Review of Economics and Statistics 84(1): 151161.
  • DiNardo, J. and Tobias, J. (2001) Nonparametric density and regression estimation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(4): 1128.
  • DiPrete, T. and Gangl, M. (2004) Assessing bias in the estimation of causal effects: Rosenbaum bounds on matching estimators and instrumental variables estimation with imperfect instruments. Sociological Methodology 34: 271310.
  • Fredriksson, P. and Johansson, P. (2004) Dynamic treatment assignment – the consequences for evaluations using observational data. Discussion Paper No. 1062, IZA.
  • Galdo, J. (2004) Evaluating the performance of non-experimental estimators: evidence from a randomized UI program. Working Paper, Centre for Policy Research, Toronto .
  • Gerfin, M. and Lechner, M. (2002) A microeconometric evaluation of the active labour market policy in Switzerland. The Economic Journal 112(482): 854893.
  • Greene, W.H. (2003) Econometric Analysis. New York : New York University.
  • Gu, X.S. and Rosenbaum, P.R. (1993) Comparison of multivariate matching methods: structures, distances and algorithms. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 2: 405420.
  • Hahn, J. (1998) On the role of the propensity score in efficient semiparametric estimation of average treatment effects. Econometrica 66(2): 315331.
  • Ham, J., Li, X. and Reagan, P. (2004) Propensity score matching, a distance-based measure of migration, and the wage growth of young men. Working Paper, Department of Economics, Ohio State University .
  • Heckman, J. (1997) Instrumental variables – a study of the implicit behavioral assumptions used in making program evaluations. Journal of Human Resources 32(3): 441462.
  • Heckman, J. and Robb, R. (1985) Alternative models for evaluating the impact of interventions. In J.Heckman and B.Singer (eds), Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data (pp. 156245). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Heckman, J. and Smith, J. (1999) The pre-program earnings dip and the determinants of participation in a social program: implications for simple program evaluation strategies. Economic Journal 109(457): 313348.
  • Heckman, J. and Todd, P. (2004) A note on adapting propensity score matching and selection models to choice based samples. Working Paper, first draft 1995, this draft Nov. 2004, University of Chicago .
  • Heckman, J., Ichimura, H. and Todd, P. (1997a) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Review of Economic Studies 64(4): 605654.
  • Heckman, J., Smith, J. and Clements, N. (1997b) Making the most out of programme evaluations and social experiments: accounting for heterogeneity in programme impacts. Review of Economic Studies 64(4): 487535.
  • Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J. and Todd, P. (1998a) Characterizing selection bias using experimental data. Econometrica 66(5): 10171098.
  • Heckman, J., Ichimura, H. and Todd, P. (1998b) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Review of Economic Studies 65(2): 261294.
    Direct Link:
  • Heckman, J., LaLonde, R. and Smith, J. (1999) The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs. In O.Ashenfelter and D.Card (eds), Handbook of Labor Economics, (Vol. III, pp. 18652097). Amsterdam : Elsevier.
  • Hirano, K. and Imbens, G. (2002) Estimation of causal effects using propensity score weighting: an application to data on right heart catherization. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology 2(3–4): 259278.
  • Hirano, K., Imbens, G. and Ridder, G. (2003) Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica 71(4): 11611189.
  • Hitt, L. and Frei, F. (2002) Do better customers utilize electronic distribution channels? The case of PC banking. Management Science 48(6): 732748.
  • Holland, P. (1986) Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81(396): 945960.
  • Ichino, A., Mealli, F. and Nannicini, T. (2006) From temporary help jobs to permanent employment: what can we learn from matching estimators and their sensitivity. Discussion Paper No. 2149, IZA, Bonn .
  • Imbens, G. (2000) The role of the propensity score in estimating dose–response functions. Biometrika 87(3): 706710.
  • Imbens, G. (2003) Sensitivity to exogeneity assumptions in program evaluation. American Economic Review 93(2): 126132.
  • Imbens, G. (2004) Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: a review. Review of Economics and Statistics 86(1): 429.
  • Lechner, M. (1998) Mikrökonometrische Evaluationsstudien: Anmerkungen zu Theorie und Praxis. In F.Pfeiffer and W.Pohlmeier (eds), Qualifikation, Weiterbildung und Arbeitsmarkterfolg. ZEW-Wirtschaftsanalysen Band 31. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlag.
  • Lechner, M. (1999) Earnings and employment effects of continuous off-the-job training in East Germany after unification. Journal of Business Economic Statistics 17(1): 7490.
  • Lechner, M. (2000) An evaluation of public sector sponsored continuous vocational training programs in East Germany. Journal of Human Resources 35(2): 347375.
  • Lechner, M. (2001a) Identification and estimation of causal effects of multiple treatments under the conditional independence assumption. In M.Lechner and F.Pfeiffer (eds), Econometric Evaluation of Labour Market Policies (pp. 118). Heidelberg : Physica.
  • Lechner, M. (2001b) A note on the common support problem in applied evaluation studies. Discussion Paper No. 2001-01, University of St Gallen, SIAW .
  • Lechner, M. (2002) Some practical issues in the evaluation of heterogeneous labour market programmes by matching methods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, A 165: 5982.
  • Lechner, M. (2004) Sequential matching estimation of dynamic causal models. Discussion Paper No. 1042, IZA.
  • Lechner, M. and Miquel, R. (2005) Identification of the effects of dyanmic treatments by sequential conditional independence assumptions. Working Paper, SIAW.
  • Leuven, E. and Sianesi, B. (2003) PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. Software, http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s432001.html.
  • Navarro-Lozano, S. (2002) Matching, selection and the propensity score: evidence from training in Mexico. Working Paper, University of Chicago .
  • Pagan, A. and Ullah, A. (1999) Nonparametric Econometrics. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  • Perkins, S.M., Tu, W., Underhill, M.G., Zhou, X. and Murray, M.D. (2000) The use of propensity scores in pharmacoepidemiologic research. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 9(2): 93101.
  • Rosenbaum, P.R. (2002) Observational Studies. New York : Springer.
  • Rosenbaum, P. and Rubin, D. (1983a) Assessing sensitivity to an unobserved binary covariate in an observational study with binary outcome. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 45: 212218.
  • Rosenbaum, P. and Rubin, D. (1983b) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1): 4150.
  • Rosenbaum, P. and Rubin, D. (1984) Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association 79: 516524.
  • Rosenbaum, P. and Rubin, D. (1985) Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician 39(1): 3338.
  • Roy, A. (1951) Some thoughts on the distribution of earnings. Oxford Economic Papers 3(2): 135145.
  • Rubin, D. (1973) The use of matched sampling and regression adjustment to remove bias in observational studies. Biometrics 29(1): 185203.
  • Rubin, D. (1974) Estimating causal effects to treatments in randomised and nonrandomised studies. Journal of Educational Psychology 66: 688701.
  • Rubin, D. (1979) Using multivariate matched sampling and regression adjustment to control bias in observational studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74(366): 318328.
  • Rubin, D. (1980) Comment on Basu, D. – Randomization analysis of experimental data: the Fisher randomization test. Journal of the American Statistical Association 75(371): 591593.
  • Rubin, D.B. and Thomas, N. (1996) Matching using estimated propensity scores: relating theory to practice. Biometrics 52(1): 249264.
  • Sianesi, B. (2001) An evaluation of the active labour market programmes in Sweden. Working Paper No. 2001:5, IFAU – Office of Labour Market Policy Evaluation.
  • Sianesi, B. (2004) An evaluation of the Swedish system of active labour market programmes in the 1990s. Review of Economics and Statistics 86(1): 133155.
  • Silverman, B. (1986) Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. London: Chapman and Hall.
  • Smith, H. (1997) Matching with multiple controls to estimate treatment effects in observational studies. Sociological Methodology 27: 325353.
  • Smith, J. (2000) A critical survey of empirical methods for evaluating active labor market policies. Schweizerische Zeitschrift fuer Volkswirtschaft und Statistik 136(3): 122.
  • Smith, J. and Todd, P. (2005) Does matching overcome LaLonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators? Journal of Econometrics 125(1–2): 305353.
  • Wooldridge, J.M. (2004) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Boston, MA : Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Zhao, Z. (2000) Data issues of using matching methods to estimate treatment effects: an illustration with NSW data set. Working Paper, China Centre for Economic Research.
  • Zhao, Z. (2004) Using matching to estimate treatment effects: data requirements, matching metrics, and Monte Carlo evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics 86(1): 91107.