SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Antitrust Modernization Commission, 2007, Report and Recommendations, available at http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/amc/report_recommendation/toc.htm.
  • Barnett, T. O., 2006, Letter to Robert A. Skitol, October 30, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/busreview/219380.pdf.
  • Barnett, T. O., 2007, Letter to Michael A. Lindsay, April 30, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/busreview/222978.pdf.
  • Bernheim, B. D. and Whinston, M. D., 1986, ‘Menu Auctions, Resource Allocation and Economic Influence,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, pp. 132.
  • Burk, D. L. and Lemley, M. A., 2009, The Patent Crisis and How the Courts Can Solve It (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.).
  • Chiao, B.; Lerner, J. and Tirole, J., 2007, ‘The Rules of Standard-Setting Organizations: An Empirical Analysis,’ Rand Journal of Economics, 38, pp. 905930.
  • Cournot, A. A., 1838, Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth, Ch. IX. (N.T. Bacon, trans., A.M. Kelly, New York, 1971) reprinted in Competition Policy International, 2008, 4, pp. 292305.
  • DeLacey, B.J.; Herman, K.; Kiron, D. and Lerner, J., 2006, ‘Strategic Behavior in Standard-Setting Organizations,’ working paper, Harvard Business School, May, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=903214.
  • Denicolò, V.; Geradin, D.; Layne-Farrar, A. and Padilla, A. J., 2007, ‘Revisiting Injunctive Relief: Interpreting eBay in High-Tech Industries with Non-Practicing Patent Holders,’ working paper, October, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=232826.
  • Dewatripont, M. and Legros, P., 2008, ‘ “Essential” Patents, FRAND Royalties and Technological Standards,’ ECARES working paper 2008_010, April, available at http://www.ecares.org/index.php?option=com_docman&Itemid=204.
  • European Commission, 2004, ‘Guidelines on the Application of Article 81 of the EC Treaty to Technology Transfer Agreements,’ Official Journal of the European Union, 47 (27 April), pp. 242.
  • Farrell, J.; Hayes, J.; Shapiro, C. and Sullivan, S., 2007, ‘Standard Setting, Patents, and Hold-Up,’ Antitrust Law Journal, 74, pp. 603670.
  • Froeb, L. M. and Ganglmair, B., 2009, ‘An Equilibrium Analysis of Antitrust as a Solution to the Problem of Patent Hold-Up,’ working paper, February, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1340722.
  • Galbraith, J. K., 1952, American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.).
  • Ganske, Ron, 2008, ‘The N-Data and Rambus Cases: FTC May Be Moving toward Regulation of Standard-Setting Conduct Claims through Use of General Unfairness Standard,’ Icarus, November, pp. 32–36, available at http://www.abanet.org/abanet/common/login/securedarea.cfm?areaType=premium&role=at&url=/antitrust/mo/premium-at/at-cic/november-2008.pdf
  • Geradin, D., 2006, ‘Standardization and Technological Innovation: Some Reflections on Ex-Ante Licensing, FRAND and the Proper Means to Reward Innovators,’ World Competition, 29, pp. 511533.
  • Geradin, D. and Layne-Farrar, A., 2007, ‘The Logic and Limits of Ex Ante Competition in a Standard-Setting Environment,’ Competition Policy International, 3, pp. 79106.
  • Geradin, D.; Layne-Farrar, A. and Padilla, A. J., 2008a, ‘Royalty Stacking in High Tech Industries: Separating Myth from Reality,’ working paper, May, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=232826.
  • Geradin, D.; Layne-Farrar, A. and Padilla, A. J., 2008b, ‘The Ex Ante Auction Model for the Control of Market Power in Standard Setting Organizations,’ working paper, May, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=232826.
  • Geradin, D.; Layne-Farrar, A. and Padilla, A. J., 2008c, ‘Elves or Trolls? The Role of Non-Practicing Patent Owners in the Innovation Economy,’ working paper, May, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=232826.
  • Geradin, D. and Rato, M., 2007, ‘Can Standard-Setting Lead to Exploitative Abuse? A Dissonant View on Patent Hold-Up, Royalty Stacking and the Meaning of FRAND,’ European Competition Journal, 3, pp. 154.
  • Hall, B. and Ziedonis, R., 2001, ‘The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1979–1995,’ Rand Journal of Economics, 32, pp. 101128.
  • Harhoff, D., 2006, ‘Intellectual Property Rights in Europe – Where do We Stand and Where Should We Go?,’ discussion paper, Economic Council of Finland, available at http://www.vnk.fi/hankkeet/talousneuvosto/tyo-kokoukset/globalisaatioselvitys-9-2006/artikkelit/Harhoff_06-09-20.pdf.
  • Harhoff, D.; Hall, B.; Von Graevenitz, G.; Hoisl, K. and Wagner, S., 2007, ‘The Strategic Use of Patents and its Implications for Enterprise and Competition Policies,’ report ENTR/05/82 for DG Enterprise, European Commission, July, at http://www/en.inno-tec.bwl.uni-muenchen.de/research/proj/laufendeprojekte/patents/stratpat2007.pdf.
  • Hovenkamp, H. J., 2008, ‘Patent Continuations, Patent Deception and Standard Setting: The Rambus and Broadcom Decision,’ University of Iowa College of Law research paper 08-25, June, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1138002.
  • IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA), 2002, ‘Comments Regarding Competition and Intellectual Property,’ April 17, available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/comments/intelpropertycomments/ieee.pdf.
  • Jaffe, A. and Lerner, J., 2004, Innovation and Its Discontents (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, U.S.A.).
  • Kim, S. H., 2004, ‘Vertical Structure and Patent Pools,’ Review of Industrial Organization, 25, pp. 231250.
  • Kobayashi, B. H. and Wright, J. D., 2009, ‘Federalism, Substantive Preemption and Limits on Antitrust: An Application to Patent Holdup,’ Journal of Competition Law and Economics, forthcoming.
  • Lande, Robert H., 2009, ‘Revitalizing Section 5 of the FTC Act Using “Consumer Choice” Analysis,’ The Antitrust Source, February, available at http://www.abanet.org/antitrust/at-source/09/02/Feb09-Lande2-26f.pdf.
  • Layne-Farrar, A., 2009, ‘Patents in Motion: The Troubling Implications of the N-Data Settlement,’ Global Competition Policy, release March-09 (2), available at http://www.globalcompetitionpolicy.org.
  • Layne-Farrar, A.; Padilla, A. J. and Schmalensee, R., 2007, ‘Pricing Patents for Licensing in Standard-Setting Organizations: Making Sense of FRAND Commitments,’ Antitrust Law Journal, 74, pp. 603706.
  • Layne-Farrar, A.; Llobet, G. and Padilla, A. J., 2008, ‘Are Joint Negotiations in Standard Setting “Reasonably Necessary”?,’ LECG working paper, May, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1129551.
  • Lemley, M., 2002, ‘Intellectual Property Rights and Standard-Setting Organizations,’ California Law Review, 90, pp. 18891980.
  • Lemley, M., 2007, ‘Ten Things To Do about Patent Holdup of Standards (and One Not To),’ Boston College Law Review, 48, pp. 149168.
  • Lemley, M., 2008, ‘Are Universities Patent Trolls?,’ Fordham Intellectual Property Media and Entertainment Law Journal, 18, pp. 611631.
  • Lemley, M. and Shapiro, C., 2007, ‘Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking,’ Texas Law Review, 85, pp. 19902049.
  • Lévêque, F. and Ménière, Y., 2007, ‘Licensing Commitments in Standard Setting Organizations,’ CERNA working paper 11/2007, Ecole des Mines de Paris, November, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1030520.
  • Lévêque, F. and Ménière, Y., 2008, ‘Technology Standards, Patents and Antitrust,’ Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 9, pp. 2948.
  • Majoras, D. P., 2005, ‘Recognizing the Procompetitive Potential of Royalty Discussions in Standard Setting,’ speech, September 23, available at http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/majoras/050923stanford.pdf.
  • Masoudi, G. F., 2007, ‘Antitrust Enforcement and Standard Setting: The VITA and IEEE Letters and the ‘IP2’ Report,’ speech, May 10, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/speeches/223363.wpd.
  • Meyer, D. L., 2008, ‘Harnessing SDO Innovation to Reduce Holdup, Uncertainty and Inefficiency,’ Global Competition Policy, release May-08 (1), available at http://www.globalcompetitionpolicy.org.
  • Miller, J. S., 2007, ‘Standard Setting, Patents and Access Lock-in: RAND Licensing and the Theory of the Firm,’ Indiana Law Review, 40, pp. 351396.
  • Padilla, A. J. and Teece, D. J., 2007, ‘Positive and Normative Implications of the Third Anti-Patent Crusade (circa 2007),’ Beesley Lecture, University of London, October, available from the authors: jpadilla@lecg.comor david_teese@lecg.com.
  • Rysman, M. and Simcoe, T., 2008, ‘Patents and the Performance of Voluntary Standard Setting Organizations,’ mimeo, Boston University, February, available at http://people.bu.edu/mrysman/research/Default.htm.
  • Schmidt, K., 2008, ‘Complementary Patents and Market Structure,’ discussion paper no. 7005, Centre for Economic Policy Research, October, available at http://www.cepr.org/Pubs/new-dps/dplist.asp?dpno=7005http
  • Shapiro, C., 1985, ‘Patent Licensing and R&D Competition,’ American Economic Review, 75, pp. 2530.
  • Shapiro, C., 2001a, ‘Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools and Standard Setting,’ in Jaffe, A. B., Lerner, J. and Stern, S. (eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy, 1, pp. 119150.
  • Shapiro, C., 2001b, ‘Setting Compatibility Standards, Cooperation or Collusion,’ in Dreyfuss, R., Zimmerman, D. L. and First, H. (eds.), Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property (Oxford University Press, Oxford, England).
  • Shapiro, C., 2006, ‘Injunctions, Hold-Up and Patent Royalties,’ working paper, University of California, Berkeley, California, U.S.A., August, available at http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/shapiro/royalties.pdf.
  • Sidak, J. G., 2008, ‘Patent Holdup and Oligopsonistic Collusion in Standard-Setting Organizations,’ Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 5, pp. 125188.
  • Simcoe, T., 2006, ‘Explaining the Increase in Intellectual Property Disclosure,’ in Bolin, S. (ed.), The Standards Edge: Golden Mean (Sheridan Books, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.). pp. 153162.
  • Simcoe, T., 2008, ‘Standard Setting Committees,’ working paper, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, available at http://www.rotman.utoronto.ca/timothy.simcoe/papers/SSOCommittees_v2.pdf
  • Skitol, R. A., 2005, ‘Concerted Buying Power: Its Potential for Addressing the Patent Holdup Problem in Standard Setting,’ Antitrust Law Journal, 72, pp. 727744.
  • Swanson, D. G. and Baumol, W. J., 2005, ‘Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (RAND) Royalties, Standards Selection and Control of Market Power,’ Antitrust Law Journal, 73, pp. 158.
  • Tirole, J.; Strojwas, M. and Lerner, J., 2003, ‘Cooperative Marketing Agreements between Competitors: Evidence from Patent Pools,’ NBER working paper no. W9680 (May), available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=406052.
  • U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission, 2007, Antitrust Enforcement and Intellectual Property Rights: Promoting Innovation and Competition (Washington, D.C., U.S.A., April), available at http://www.ftc.gov/reports/innovation/P040101PromotingInnovationandCompetitionrpt0704.pdf.
  • U.S. Federal Trade Commission, 2003, To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance Between Competition and Patent Law and Policy (Washington, D.C., U.S.A., October), available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/2003/10/innovationrpt.pdf.
  • U.S. National Academy of Science, 2004, A Patent System for the 21st Century (The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.).
  • Villarejo, C. M. and Banasevic, N., 2008, ‘Standards and Market Power,’ Global Competition Policy, release May-08 (1), available at http://www.globalcompetitionpolicy.org.
  • Wright, J. D., 2009, ‘Why the Supreme Court Was Correct to Deny Certiorari in FTC v. Rambus,’ Global Competition Policy, release March-09 (2), available at http://www.globalcompetitionpolicy.org.
  • Zoettl, J.; Evrard, S.; Oliver, G.; McDonald, B.; Harris, S.; Watanable, S.; Miyakawa, H.; Wang, P. and Zhang, Y., ‘Recent Developments in the United States, EU and Asia at the Intersection of Antitrust and Patent Law,’ Global Competition Policy, release March-09 (2), available at http://www.globalcompetitionpolicy.org.