SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, S.; De Palma, A. and Thisse, J.-F., 1992, Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.).
  • Ashenfelter, O.; Ashmore, D.; Baker, J. B. and Kernan, S., 1998 ‘Identifying the Firm-Specific Pass-Through Rate, Federal Trade Commission,’ Bureau of Economics working paper No. 217, Washington, D.C., U.S.A., see http://www.ftc.gov/be/workpapers/wp217.pdf
  • Antitrust Modernization Commission. 2007, ‘Civil and Criminal Remedies,’ Chapter 3 in Report and Recommendations) from http://www.amc.gov/report_recommendation/amc_final_report.pdf
  • Basso, L. J. and Ross, T. W., 2007 ‘Measuring the True Harm from Price-Fixing to Both Direct and Indirect Purchasers,’ working paper 25, April, 2007, Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Boone, J. and Müller, W., 2008, ‘On the Distribution of Harm in Price-Fixing Cases,’ working paper, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
  • Bresnahan, T., 1989, ‘Empirical Methods for Industries with Market Power,’ in Schmalensee, R. and Willig, R. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 2 (Elsevier Publisher Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands).
  • Carlton, D., 2007, ‘Separate Statement to Antitrust Modernizaton Commission Report and Recommendations,’ URL http://govinfo.library.unt.ed/amc/report_recommendation/seperate_statements.pdf
  • Connor, J. M., 2004, ‘Price-Fixing Overcharges: Legal and Economic Evidence,’ working paper, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
  • Corts, K., 1999, ‘Conduct Parameters and the Measurement of Market Power,’ Journal of Econometrics, 88, pp. 227250.
  • Davis, P. and Garces, E., 2007, ‘Damage Estimation,’ in: Davis, P. and Garces, E., Quantitative Techniques for Competition Analysis (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, U.S.A.). forthcoming.
  • European Commission, 2005, Green Paper: Damages Actions for Breach of the EC Antitrust Rules (DG-Competition, Brussels, Belgium).
  • European Commission, 2008, White Paper: Damages Actions for Breach of the EC Antitrust Rules (DG-Competition, Brussels, Belgium).
  • Farrell, J. and Shapiro, C., 1990, ‘Horizontal Mergers: and Equilibrium Analysis,’ American Economic Review, 80, pp. 107126.
  • Genesove, D. and Mullin, W. P., 1998, ‘Testing Static Oligopoly Models: Conduct and Cost in the Sugar Industry: 1890–1914,’ RAND Journal of Economics, 29, pp. 355377.
  • Han, M.; Schinkel, M. P. and Tuinstra, J., 2008, ‘On the Overcharge as an Estimator for Total Chain Antitrust Damages,’ mimeo, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Harris, R. G. and Sullivan, L. A., 1979, ‘Passing on the Monopoly Overcharge: A Comprehensive Policy Analysis,’ University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 128, pp. 269360.
  • Hellwig, M., 2006, ‘Private Damage Claims and the Passing-On Defense in Horizontal Price-Fixing Cases: An Economist's Perspective,’ working paper, Max Planck Institute, Bonn, Germany, 29pp.
  • Hussain, S.; Garrett, D. and Howell, V. M., 2001, ‘Economics of Class Action Certification in Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Cases,’ Journal of the Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Section of the State Bar of California, pp. 1852.
  • Kosicki, G. and Cahill, M. B., 2006, ‘Economics of Cost Pass-Through and Damages in Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Cases,’ Antitrust Bulletin, 51 (3), pp. 599630.
  • Landes, W. M. and Posner, R. A., 1979, ‘Should Indirect Purchasers Have Standing to Sue Under Antitrust Laws? An Economic Analysis of the Rule of Illinois Brick,’ University of Chicago Law Review, 46, pp. 602635.
  • Leslie, C. R., 2006, ‘Antitrust Damages and Deadweight Loss,’ The Antitrust Bulletin, 51 (3), pp. 521567.
  • Levenstein, M. C. and Suslow, V., 2006, ‘What Determines Cartel Success?,’ Journal of Economic Literature, 44 (1), pp. 4395.
  • Norberg, S., 2005, ‘Some Elements to Enhance Damages Actions for Breach of the Competition Rules in Articles 81 and 82 EC,’ mimeo presented at 32nd Annual International Antitrust Law & Policy Conference, Fordham, New York, 31pp, http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/speeches/text/sp2005_019_en.pdf.
  • Reiss, P. and Wolak, F., Structural Econometric Modeling: Rationale and Examples from Industrial Organization,’ in Heckman, J. and Leamer, E., Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 6A (Elsevier Publisher Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands).
  • Rey, P. and Tirole, J., 2006, ‘A Primer on Foreclosure,’ in Armstrong, M. and Porter, R., Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 3 (Elsevier Publisher Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands).
  • Schinkel, M. P.; Tuinstra, K. and Rüggeberg, J., 2008, ‘Illinois Walls: How Barring Indirect Purchaser Suits Facilitates Collusion,’ The RAND Journal of Economics, 3 (39), pp. 683698.
  • Stennek, J. and Verboven, F., 2001, ‘Merger Control and Enterprise Competitiveness: Empirical Analysis and Policy Recommendations,’ European Economy, 5, pp. 130194.
  • Van Dijk, T. and Verboven, F., 2008, ‘Quantification of Damages,’ in Collins, W. D. (ed.), Issues in Competition Law and Policy, Vol. 3 (American Bar Association, Chicago, Illinois, USA).
  • Vives, X., 1999, Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A).
  • Waelbroeck, D.; Slater, D. and Even-Shoshan, G., 2004, ‘Study on the Conditions for Claims for Damages in Case of Infringement of EC Competition Rules: Comparative Report,’ Ashurst Study for Directorate General Competition of the EU Commission, London, England.
  • Werden, G. and Froeb, L., 1994, ‘The Effects of Mergers in Differentiated Products Industries: Logit Demand and Merger Policy,’ Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 10, pp. 407426.