Waiting for Enron: The Unstable Equilibrium of Auditor Independence Regulation
My thanks to Marlies Braun, Alison Kershaw, Jorge Guira, Richard Moorhead, Bo Rutledge, and the anonymous referees for comments on earlier versions of this paper. Ben Grebe and Nadia Saggi provided excellent research assistance.
Abstract
A primary function of auditor independence regulation is to ensure that any financial incentives auditors may have to approve misleading or inaccurate accounting are outweighed by market and regulatory deterrents to compromising an auditor's independence. This article is an inquiry into the current state of this incentive equilibrium in the United Kingdom: the possible costs and benefits that may be incurred by auditors if they elect to acquiesce to management's demands to accept problematic accounting. It argues that the equilibrium position currently incentivizes a rational auditor to acquiesce. On the one hand, the article demonstrates that the recent evolution of audit firm revenue streams has provided auditors with a substantial incentive to compromise their independence and provided management with credible sanctions to pressurize them to do so. On the other hand, the article shows that regulatory and market costs of acquiescence do not counterbalance the benefits of acquiescence.