Get access

The Antecedents of Middle Managers’ Strategic Contribution: The Case of a Professional Bureaucracy

Authors


Graeme Currie, Nottingham University Business School, Jubilee Campus, Nottingham University, Wollaton Road, Nottingham NG8 1BB, UK (graeme.currie@nottingham.ac.uk).

Abstract

abstract  Our study contributes towards a burgeoning literature that argues organizational performance is heavily influenced by what happens in the middle of the organization, rather than at the top. Examining the UK National Health Service, our study develops the work of Floyd and Wooldridge (1992, 1994, 1997, 2000). It utilizes role theory to conceptualize changing experiences of middle managers in organizations as a role transition. Associated with this are problems of role conflict and role ambiguity (Biddle, 1979, 1986; Biddle and Thomas, 1966; Kahn et al., 1964, 1966). Our study illustrates that there are limiting factors to a more strategic role for middle managers associated with the professional bureaucracy context. However, role conflict and ambiguity can be mediated by a socialization process, which values incoming identity and personal characteristics (Van Maanen and Schein, 1979).

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary