Get access

Performance Implications of Ties to the Government and SOEs: A Political Embeddedness Perspective

Authors

  • Ilya Okhmatovskiy

    Corresponding author
    1. McGill University
      Ilya Okhmatovskiy, Desautels Faculty of Management, McGill University, 1001 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1G5, Canada (ilya.okhmatovskiy@mcgill.ca).
    Search for more papers by this author

Ilya Okhmatovskiy, Desautels Faculty of Management, McGill University, 1001 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1G5, Canada (ilya.okhmatovskiy@mcgill.ca).

abstract

In many countries governments not only regulate business activities, but also become involved in the corporate governance of individual firms through ownership and board ties. While existing studies usually focus either on benefits of political connections or on costs of government influence, a political embeddedness perspective helps us consider both advantages and constraints associated with ties to the government. In particular, firms with direct ties to the government will experience significant costs associated with government officials' involvement in the corporate governance process. In contrast, firms with ties to state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are connected to the government indirectly and thus, while getting access to state-owned resources, avoid costs associated with the government's interventions. This study compares the performance consequences of board and ownership ties to the government with the consequences of board and ownership ties to SOEs. I find that ties to SOEs are associated with higher profitability, while no significant differences are discovered for firms with direct ties to the government.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary