SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Aldrich, H. E. and Cliff, J. E. (2003). ‘The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: toward a family embeddedness perspective’. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 57396.
  • Anderson, R. C. and Reeb D. M. (2003). ‘Founding-family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500’. Journal of Finance, 58, 130128.
  • Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate Strategy: An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Ashforth, B. E. and Mael, F. (1989). ‘Social identity theory and the organization’. Academy of Management Review, 14, 2039.
  • Bennedsen, M., Nielson, K. M., Pérez-González, F. and Wolfenzon, D. (2007). ‘Inside the family firm: the role of families in succession decisions and performance’. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 64791.
  • Bertrand, M. and Schoar, A. (2006). ‘The role of family in family firms’. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 7396.
  • Bloom, N. and Van Reenen, J. (2007). ‘Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries’. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 1351408.
  • Boltanski, L. and Thevenot, L. (1991). On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Burke, P. J. (1980). ‘The self: measurement requirements from an interactionist perspective’. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 1829.
  • Burke, P. J. and Reitzes, D. C. (1981). ‘The link between identity and role performance’. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 8392.
  • Chandler, A. D. (1990). Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Chung, C. N. and Luo, X. (2008). ‘Human agents, context and institutional change: the decline of family in the leadership of business groups’. Organization Science, 19, 12442.
  • Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H. and Lang, L. H. P. (2002). ‘Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings’. Journal of Finance, 57, 274171.
  • Cronqvist, H. and Nilsson, M. (2003). ‘Agency costs of controlling minority shareholders’. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38, 695719.
  • Davidsson, P., Delmar, F. and Wiklund, J. (2002). ‘Entrepreneurship as growth; growth as entrepreneurship’. In Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R., Camp, S. and Sexton, L. (Eds), Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating a New Mindset. Oxford: Blackwell, 32842.
  • Donaldson, T. and Preston, L. E. (1995). ‘The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence and implications’. Academy of Management Review, 20, 6591.
  • Dreux, D. R. (1990). ‘Financing family business’. Family Business Review, 3, 22535.
  • Durand, R. and Vargas, V. (2003). ‘Ownership, organization and private firms' efficient use of resources’. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 66775.
  • Fiss, P. C. and Zajac, E. J. (2004). ‘The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: the (non) adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 50134.
  • Friedland, R. and Alford, R. R. (1991). ‘Bringing society back in: symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions’. In Powell, W. W. and DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, 23265.
  • Galvin, T. L. (2002). ‘Examining institutional change’. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 67396.
  • Gersick, K. E., Davis, J. A., McCollom Hampton, M. and Lansberg, I. (1997). Generation to Generation: Life Cycles of the Family Business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Glynn, M. A. and Lounsbury, M. (2005). ‘From the critics' corner: logic blending, discursive change and authenticity in a cultural production system’. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 103155.
  • Gomez-Mejia, L. R. and Wiseman, R. (2007). ‘Does agency theory have universal relevance? A reply to Lubatkin, Lane, Collin, and Very’. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 818.
  • Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Nuñez-Nickel, M. and Gutierrez, I. (2001). ‘The role of family ties in agency contracts’. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 8195.
  • Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Takacs Haynes, K. and Nunez-Nickel, M. (2007). ‘Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: evidence from Spanish olive oil mills’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 10637.
  • Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall.
  • Greenwood, R. and Suddaby, R. (2006). ‘Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: the big five accounting firms’. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 2748.
  • Greenwood, R., Deephouse, D. L. and Li, S. X. (2007). ‘Ownership and performance of professional service firms’. Organization Studies, 28, 21938.
  • Greenwood, R., Diaz, A. M., Li, S. X. and Lorente, J. C. (2010). ‘The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses’. Organization Science, in press. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0453.
  • Harrigan, K. R. and Porter, M. E. (1983). ‘End-game strategies for declining industries’. Harvard Business Review, 61, 11120.
  • Henderson, B. D. (1979). Henderson on Corporate Strategy. Cambridge, MA: ABT Books.
  • Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Camp, S. M. and Sexton, D. L. (2002). Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating a New Mindset. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Hofer, C. W. and Schendel, D. (1978). Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts. St Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.
  • Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J. and White, K. M. (1995). ‘A tale of two theories: a critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory’. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 25569.
  • Holderness, C. and Sheehan, D. (1988). ‘The role of majority shareholders in publicly held corporations’. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 31746.
  • Jacobs, M. T. (1996). Short Term America: The Causes and Cures of Our Business Myopia. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • James, H. S. (2006). Family Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Belknap-Harvard University Press.
  • Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. (1976). ‘Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure’. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 30560.
  • Kang, D. (1999). The Impact of Ownership Type on Organization Performance. PhD Thesis, Harvard University.
  • Karra, N., Tracey, P. and Phillips, N. (2006). ‘Altruism and agency in the family firm: exploring the role of family, kinship, and ethnicity’. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 30, 86177.
  • Kirzner, I. M. (1979). Perception, Opportunity, and Profit: Studies in the Theory of Entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Landes, D. S. (2006). Dynasty: Fortunes and Misfortunes of the World's Great Family Businesses. New York: Viking.
  • Leach, D. and Leahy, J. (1991). ‘Ownership structure, control type classifications, and the performance of large British companies’. Economic Journal, 101, 141837.
  • Liang, K. Y. and Zeger, S. L. (1986). ‘Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models’. Biometrika, 73, 1322.
  • Loasby, B. J. (2007). ‘A cognitive perspective on entrepreneurship and the firm’. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 1078106.
  • Lubatkin, M. H., Ling, Y. and Schulze, W. S. (2007). ‘An organizational justice-based view of self control and agency costs in family firms’. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 95571.
  • Maury, B. (2006). ‘Family ownership and firm performance: empirical evidence from Western European corporations’. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, 32141.
  • McConaughy, D. L., Walker, M. C., Henderson, G. V. Jr and Mishra, C. S. (1998). ‘Founding family controlled firms: efficiency and value’. Review of Financial Economics, 7, 119.
  • Miller, D. (1983). ‘The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms’. Management Science, 29, 77091.
  • Miller, D. and Le Breton-Miller, I. (2005). Managing for the Long Run: Lessons in Competitive Advantage from Great Family Businesses. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R. H. and Cannella, A. A. Jr (2007). ‘Do family businesses outperform? A study of the Fortune 1000’. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13, 82958.
  • Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I. and Lester, R. (2010). ‘Family ownership and acquisition behavior in publicly traded companies’. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 20123.
  • Mishra, C. S. and McConaughy, D. L. (1999). ‘Founding family control and capital structure: the risk of loss of control and the aversion to debt’. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 23, 5364.
  • Morck, R. K., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. (1988). ‘Management ownership and market valuation: an empirical analysis’. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293315.
  • Morck, R. K., Wolfenzon, D. and Yeung, B. (2005). ‘Corporate governance, economic entrenchment, and growth’. Journal of Economic Literature, 43, 655720.
  • Nisbet, R. A. (1970). The Social Bond. New York: Knopf.
  • Pérez-González, F. (2006). ‘Inherited control and firm performance’. American Economic Review, 96, 155988.
  • Peterson, M. A. (2009). ‘Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: comparing approaches’. Review of Financial Studies, 22, 43580.
  • Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. and Hardy, C. (2004). ‘Discourse and institutions’. Academy of Management Review, 29, 118.
  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analysing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.
  • Reay, T. and Hinings, C. R. (2005). ‘The recomposition of an organizational field: health care in Alberta’. Organization Studies, 26, 34982.
  • Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H. and Dino, R. (2001). ‘Agency relationships in family firms: theory and evidence’. Organization Science, 12, 99116.
  • Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. (1997). ‘A survey of corporate governance’. Journal of Finance, 52, 73783.
  • Shleifer, A. and Wolfenzon, D. (2002). ‘Investor protection and equity markets’. Journal of Financial Economics, 66, 327.
  • Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
  • Stryker, S. (1987). ‘Identity theory: developments and extensions’. In Yardley, K. and Honess, T. (Eds), Self and Identity: Psychosocial Perspectives. Chichester: John Wiley, 89103.
  • Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. C. (1979). ‘An integrative theory of inter-group conflict’. In Austin, W. G. and Worchel, S. (Eds), The Social Psychology of Inter-Group Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole, 3347.
  • Thornton, P. H. (2004). Markets from Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Thornton, P. H. and Ocasio, W. (1999). ‘Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990’. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 80143.
  • Thornton, P. H. and Ocasio, W. (2008). ‘Institutional logics’. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. and Suddaby, R. (Eds), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 99129.
  • Thornton, P. H., Jones, C. and Kury, K. (2005). ‘Institutional logics and institutional change in organizations: transformation in accounting, architecture, and publishing’. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 23, 12772.
  • Van de Ven, A. H. and Ferry, D. (1980). Measuring and Assessing Organizations. New York, NY: Wiley Interscience.
  • Villalonga, B. and Amit, R. (2006). ‘How do family ownership, management and control affect firm value?’. Journal of Financial Economics, 80, 385417.
  • Ward, J. L. (2004). Perpetuating the Family Business: 50 Lessons Learned from Long Lasting, Successful Families in Business. Marietta, GA: Family Enterprise Publishers.
  • Zeger, S. L., Liang, K. Y. and Albert, P. S. (1988). ‘Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach’. Biometrics, 44, 104960.