SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Ayres, R. U. and Rohatgi, P. K. (1987). ‘Bhopal: lessons for technological decision-makers. Technology in Society, 9, 1945.
  • Baron, R. M. and Misovich, S. J. (1999). ‘On the relationship between social and cognitive modes of organization’. In Chaiken, S. and Trope, Y. (Eds), Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology. New York: Guilford, 586605.
  • Barsade, S. G. and Gibson, D. E. (2007). ‘Why does affect matter in organizations?. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 3659.
  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Burke, K. (19451969). A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Cartwright, D. (1959). ‘Lewinian theory as a contemporary systematic framework’. In Koch, S. (Ed.), Psychology: A Study of a Science. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2, 791.
  • Cerulo, K. A. (2006). Never Saw It Coming: Cultural Challenges to Envisioning the Worst. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
  • Chouhan, T. R. (2004). Bhopal: The Inside Story. New York: Apex.
  • Clarke, L. (2001). Mission Improbable: Using Fantasy Documents to Tame Disaster. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
  • Deutsch, M. (1954). ‘Field theory in social psychology’. In Lindzey, G. (Ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1, 181222.
  • Dewey, J. (19222002). Human Nature and Conduct. Mineola, NY: Dover.
  • D'Silva, T. (2006). The Black Box of Bhopal. Victoria, BC, Canada: Trafford.
  • Eco, U. and Sebeok, T. (Eds) (1988). The Sign of Three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce: Advances in Semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2009). Positivity. New York: Crown.
  • Gilbert, D. T. (1991). ‘How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, 10719.
  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis. New York: Harper Colophon.
  • Hanna, B., Morehouse, W. and Sarangi, S. (2005). The Bhopal Reader. New York: Apex Press.
  • Hernes, T. (2008). Understanding Organization as Process. New York: Routledge.
  • James, W. (1992). Writings 1878–1899. New York: The Library of America.
  • James, W. (1996). Some Problems of Philosophy: A Beginning of an Introduction to Philosophy. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Kramer, E.-H. (2007). Organizing Doubt: Grounded Theory, Army Units and Dealing with Dynamic Complexity. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
  • Lagadec, P. (1993). Preventing Chaos in a Crisis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Langer, E. (1989). ‘Minding matters: the consequences of mindlessness–mindfulness’. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic, 22, 13773.
  • Lapierre, D. and Moro, J. (2002). Five Past Midnight in Bhopal. New York: Warner.
  • Law, J. (2004). After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.
  • Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Locke, K., Golden-Biddle, K. and Feldman, M. S. (2008). ‘Making doubt generative: rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organization Science, 19, 90718.
  • Maitlis, S. (2005). ‘The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 149.
  • Maitlis, S. and Sonenshein, S. (2010). ‘Sensemaking in crisis and change: inspiration and insights from Weick 1988. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 55180.
  • McDermott, J. J. (1981). The Philosophy of John Dewey. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
  • Mills, J. H. (2003). Making Sense of Organizational Change. New York: Routledge.
  • Patriotta, G. (2004). Organizational Knowledge in the Making: How Firms Create, Use and Institutionalize Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Perin, C. (2005). Shouldering Risks: The Culture of Control in the Nuclear Power Industry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents. New York: Basic.
  • Reich, J. W. (2008). ‘Integrating science and practice: adopting the Pasteurian model. Review of General Psychology, 12, 36577.
  • Reynolds, L. T. (2003). ‘Intellectual precursors’. In Reynolds, L. T. and Herman-Kinney, N. J. (Eds), Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press, 3958.
  • Roberts, K. H. (1990). ‘Some characteristics of high reliability organizations. Organization Science, 1, 16077.
  • Roux-Dufort, C. (2007). ‘A passion for imperfections: revisiting crisis management’. In Pearson, C., Roux-Dufort, C. and Clair, J. (Eds), Handbook of Organizational Crisis Management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 22152.
  • Schulman, P. R. (1993). ‘The negotiated order of organizational reliability. Administration and Society, 25, 35372.
  • Shrivastava, P. (1987). Bhopal: Anatomy of a Crisis. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
  • Tsoukas, H. (2005). Complex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Turner, B. A. and Pigeon, P. N. F. (1997). Man-Made Disasters, 2nd edition. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Vaughan, D. (1999). ‘The dark side of organizations: mistake, misconduct, and disaster. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 271305.
  • Weick, K. E. (1988). ‘Enacted sensemaking in crisis situations. Journal of Management Studies, 25, 30517.
  • Weick, K. E. (1993). ‘The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: the Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 62852.
  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Weick, K. E. and Roberts, K. H. (1993). ‘Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 35781.
  • Weick, K. E. and Sutcliffe, K. M. (2003). ‘Hospitals as cultures of entrapment: a re-analysis of the Bristol Royal Infirmary. California Management Review, 45, 7384.
  • Weick, K. E. and Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007). Managing the Unexpected, 2nd edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M. and Obstfeld, D. (1999). ‘Organizing for high reliability: processes of collective mindfulness’. In Staw, B. and Sutton, R. (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 21, 81123.
  • Weschler, L. (1982). Seeing Is Forgetting the Name of the Thing One Sees: A Life of Contemporary Artist Robert Irwin. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
  • Westrum, R. (1993). ‘Thinking by groups, organizations, and networks: a sociologist's view of the social psychology of science and technology’. In Shadish, W. and Fuller, S. (Eds), The Social Psychology of Science. New York: Guilford, 32942.