SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Ahvenainen, J. (1975). Kankaan Paperitehtaan Historia II. Jyväskylä: Sisä-Suomen kirjapaino.
  • Arthur, B. W. (1989). ‘Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal, 99, 11632.
  • Baker, T. and Nelson, R. E. (2005). ‘Creating something from nothing: resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 32966.
  • Baker, T., Miner, A. S. and Eesley, D. T. (2003). ‘Improvising firms: bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Research Policy, 32, 25576.
  • Baumol, W. J. (1990). ‘Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 893921.
  • Beckert, J. (1999). ‘Agency, entrepreneurs, and institutional change. The role of strategic choice and institutionalized practices in organizations. Organization Studies, 20, 77799.
  • Bennett, A. and Elman, C. (2006). ‘Qualitative research: recent developments in case study methods. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 45576.
  • Borocz, J. and Rona-Tass, A. (1995). ‘Small leap forward: emergence of new economic elites. Theory and Society, 24, 75181.
  • Carr, E. H. (1961). What is History?. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Cattani, G. (2005). ‘Preadaptation, firm heterogeneity, and technological performance: a study on the evolution of fiber optics, 1970–1995. Organization Science, 16, 56380.
  • Clemens, E. S. and Cook, J. M. (1999). ‘Politics and institutionalism: explaining durability and change. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 44166.
  • Coleman, J. S. (1984). ‘Psychological and sociological foundations of economic behavior. Introducing social structure into economic analysis. American Economic Review, 74, 848.
  • Collier, P. (1999). ‘On the economic consequences of civil war. Oxford Economic Papers, 51, 16883.
  • Collier, R. B. and Collier, D. (1991). Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movements, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Collingwood, R. G. (1956). The Idea of History. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Crossan, M., Cunha, M. P. E., Vera, D. and Cunha, J. (2005). ‘Time and organizational improvisation. Academy of Management Review, 30, 12945.
  • Das, T. K. and Teng, B. S. (2001). ‘Strategic risk behaviour and its temporalities: between risk propensity and decision context. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 51534.
  • Emirbayer, M. and Goodwin, J. (1994). ‘Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 141154.
  • Felin, T. and Foss, N. (2006). ‘Individuals and organizations: thoughts on a micro-foundations project for strategic management and organizational analysis’. In Ketchen, D. J. and Bergh, D. T. (Eds), Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, Vol. 3. Oxford: Elsevier, 25388.
  • Fligstein, N. (1997). ‘Social skill and institutional theory. American Behavioral Science, 40, 397405.
  • Gaddis, J. L. (2002). The Landscape of History. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Garud, R. (2008). ‘Conferences as venues for the configuration of emerging organizational fields: the case of cochlear implants. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 106188.
  • Garud, R. and Karnoe, P. (2003). ‘Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32, 277300.
  • Garud, R., Jain, S. and Kumaraswamy, A. (2002). ‘Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: the case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 196214.
  • Gould, R. V. (1991). ‘Multiple networks and mobilization in the Paris commune, 1871. American Sociological Review, 56, 71629.
  • Haapala, P. (1995). Kun Yhteiskunta Hajosi: Suomi 1914–1920 (When the Society Collapsed; Finland 1914–1920). Helsinki: Painatuskeskus.
  • Hanley, E., Yershova, N. and Anderson, R. (1995). ‘Russia – old wine in a new bottle: the circulation and reproduction of Russian elites, 1983–1993. Theory and Society, 24, 63968.
  • Haveman, H. A. and Rao, H. (1997). ‘Structuring a theory of moral sentiments: institutional and organizational coevolution in the early thrift industry. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 160651.
  • Hay, C. and Wincott, D. (1998). ‘Structure, agency and historical institutionalism. Political Studies, 46, 9517.
  • Heikkinen, S. (2000). Paper for the World: The Finnish Paper Mill's Association – Finnpap 1918–1996. Helsinki: Otava.
  • Hjerppe, R. (1989). Finnish Economy. Helsinki: Bank of Finland.
  • Hjerppe, R. and Lamberg, J.-A. (2000). ‘Changing structure and organisation of foreign trade in Finland after Russian rule’. In Teichova, A. (Ed.), Economic Change and the National Question in the 20th Century Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 382403.
  • Hodgson, G. M. (2007). ‘Institutions and individuals: interaction and evolution. Organization Studies, 28, 95116.
  • Holm, P. (1995). ‘The dynamics of institutionalization: transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 398422.
  • Juva, E. (1957). Rudolf Walden. Porvoo: Werner Söderström Oy.
  • Kieser, A. (1994). ‘Why organization theory needs historical analyses – and how this should be performed. Organization Science, 5, 60820.
  • Kiesler, S. and Sproull, L. (1982). ‘Managerial response to changing environments: perspectives on problem sensing from social cognition. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 54870.
  • Kuisma, M. (1993a). Metsäteollisuuden Maa. Jyväskylä: Gummerus.
  • Kuisma, M. (1993b). ‘Government action, cartels and national corporations – the development strategy of a small peripheral nation during the period of crisis and economic disintegration in Europe (Finland 1918–1938). Scandinavian Economic History Review, 41, 24268.
  • Lamberg, J.-A. (1998). ‘Economic interest groups in Finnish foreign-trade policy decision-making in the early years of independence. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 46, 79123.
  • Langer, E. J. (1997). The Power of Mindful Learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Lawrence, T. B., Winn, M. I. and Jennings, P. D. (2001). ‘The temporal dynamics of institutionalization. Academy of Management Review, 26, 62444.
  • Leca, B., Battilana, J. and Boxenbaum, E. (2008). ‘Agency and institutions: a review of institutional entrepreneurship’. Harvard Business School Working Paper 08-096.
  • Lewin, A. Y. and Volberda, H. W. (1999). ‘Prolegomena on coevolution: a framework for research on strategy and new organizational forms. Organization Science, 10, 51934.
  • Mahoney, J. (2000). ‘Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29, 50748.
  • Manninen, O. (Ed.) (19921993). Itsenäistymisen Vuodet 1917–1920, Osat I–III. Helsinki: Painatuskeskus.
  • March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions. New York: Free Press.
  • Miner, A. S., Bassoff, P. and Moorman, C. (2001). ‘Organizational improvisation and learning: a field study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 30437.
  • Nee, V. and Cao, Y. (1999). ‘Path dependent societal transformation: stratification in hybrid mixed economies. Theory and Society, 28, 799834.
  • Nee, V. and Ingram, P. (2001). ‘Embeddedness and beyond: institutions, exchange and social structure’. In Brinton, M. C., Nee, V. and Merton, R. K. (Eds), The New Institutionalism in Sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Norrmén, P. H. (1928). Mänttä Bruk 1868–1928. Helsinki: Tilgmann.
  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Oliver, C. (1991). ‘Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 14579.
  • Ordonez, L. and Benson, L. (1997). ‘Decisions under time pressure: how time constraint affects risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71, 12140.
  • Pajunen, K. (2006). ‘The more things change, the more they remain the same? Evaluating strategic leadership in organizational transformations. Leadership, 2, 34166.
  • Pekkarinen, J., Pohjola, M. and Rowthorn, B. (1992). Social Corporatism: A Superior Economic System? Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press.
  • Peng, M. W. (2003). ‘Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28, 27596.
  • Pettigrew, A. M. (1985). The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change in ICI. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Pettigrew, A. M. (1997). ‘What is processual analysis?. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13, 33748.
  • Pierson, P. (2000). ‘Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 25167.
  • Pihkala, E. (1968). Suomen Ulkomaankauppa 1860–1917. Kasvututkimuksia II. Helsinki: The Bank of Finland.
  • Pihkala, E. (1970). The Finnish Economy and Russia 1809–1917. Helsinki: The Bank of Finland.
  • Porter, M. E. (1991). ‘Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 95117.
  • Rautkallio, H. (1977). Kaupantekoa Suomen Itsenäisyydellä. Helsinki: Werner Söderström Oy.
  • Sawyer, R. K. (2001). ‘Emergence in sociology: contemporary philosophy of mind and some implications for sociological theory. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 55185.
  • Schneider, M. and Teske, P. (1992). ‘Toward a theory of the political entrepreneur: evidence from local government. American Political Science Review, 86, 73747.
  • Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in Administration. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Selznick, P. (1996). ‘Institutionalism “old” and “new”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 2707.
  • Seo, M. G. and Creed, W. E. D. (2002). ‘Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: a dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27, 22247.
  • Sewell, W. H. (1992). ‘A theory of structure – duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 129.
  • Tushman, M. L. and Romanelli, E. (1986). ‘Organizational evolution: a metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 171222.
  • Udehn, L. (2002). ‘The changing face of methodological individualism. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 479507.
  • Weick, K. E. (1993). ‘The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: the Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 62852.
  • Ylikangas, H. (1986). Käännekohdat Suomen Historiassa. Porvoo: Werner Söderström Oy.