SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Ahn, W. K. (1998). ‘Why are different features central for natural kinds and artifacts? The role of causal status in determining feature centrality’. Cognition, 69, 13578.
  • Ahn, W. K. (1999). ‘Effect of causal structure on category construction’. Memory & Cognition, 27, 100823.
  • Barsalou, L. W. (1983). ‘Ad hoc categories’. Memory & Cognition, 11, 21127.
  • Barsalou, L. W. (1985). ‘Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories’. Journal of Experimental Psychology – Learning Memory and Cognition, 11, 62954.
  • Barsalou, L. W. (1991). ‘Deriving categories to achieve goals’. In Bower, G. H. (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 27, 164.
  • Barsalou, L. W. (1999). ‘Perceptual symbol systems’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577660.
  • Barsalou, L. W. and Hale, C. R. (1993). ‘Components of conceptual representation: from feature lists to recursive frames’. In Van Mechelen, I., Hampton, J., Michalski, R. and Theuns, P. (Eds), Categories and Concepts: Theoretical Views and Inductive Data Analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 97144.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1996). The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Maldon, MA: Polity Press.
  • Clark, B. H. and Montgomery, D. B. (1999). ‘Managerial identification of competitors’. Journal of Marketing, 63, 6783.
  • Cornelissen, J. P. and Clarke, J. S. (2010). ‘Imagining and rationalizing opportunities: inductive reasoning and the creation and justification of new ventures’. Academy of Management Review, 35, 53957.
  • Cowley, E. and Mitchell, A. A. (2003). ‘The moderating effect of product knowledge on the learning and organization of product information’. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 44354.
  • Dimaggio, P. (1987). ‘Classification in art’. American Sociological Review, 52, 44055.
  • Durand, R. (2006). Organizational Evolution and Strategic Management. London: Sage.
  • Durand, R. and Vaara, E. (2009). ‘Causation, counterfactuals, and competitive advantage’. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 124564.
  • Durand, R., Rao, H. and Monin, P. (2007). ‘Code and conduct in French cuisine: impact of code changes on external evaluations’. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 45572.
  • Durkheim, E. and Mauss, M. (1963 [1903]). Primitive Classification. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Foreman, P. and Whetten, D. A. (2002). ‘Members' identification with multiple-identity organizations’. Organization Science, 13, 61835.
  • Gill, T. and Dube, L. (2007). ‘What is a leather iron or a bird phone? Using conceptual combinations to generate and understand new product concepts’. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 20217.
  • Goldberg, A. (2011). ‘Mapping shared understandings using relational class analysis: the case of the cultural omnivore reexamined’. American Journal of Sociology, 116, 1397436.
  • Hampton, J. A. (1979). ‘Polymorphous concepts in semantic memory’. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 44161.
  • Hannan, M. T. (2010). ‘Partiality of memberships in categories and audiences’. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 15981.
  • Hannan, M. T., Carroll, G. R. and Polos, L. (2003). ‘The organizational niche’. Sociological Theory, 21, 30940.
  • Hannan, M. T., Polos, L. and Carroll, G. R. (2007). Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Hsu, G. (2006). ‘Jacks of all trades and masters of none: audiences' reactions to spanning genres in feature film production’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 42050.
  • Hsu, G. and Hannan, M. T. (2005). ‘Identities, genres, and organizational forms’. Organization Science, 16, 47490.
  • Hsu, G., Koçak, O. and Hannan, M. T. (2009). ‘Multiple category memberships in markets: an integrative theory and two empirical tests’. American Sociological Review, 74, 15069.
  • Jensen, M. (2010). ‘Legitimizing illegitimacy: how creating market identity legitimizes illegitimate products’. In Hsu, G., Kocak, O. and Negro, G. (Eds), Categories in Markets: Origins and Evolution. Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bingley: Emerald, 31, 3980.
  • Kennedy, M. T., Lo, J. and Lounsbury, M. (2010). ‘Category currency: the changing value of conformity as a function of ongoing meaning construction’. In Hsu, G., Kocak, O. and Negro, G. (Eds), Categories in Markets: Origins and Evolution. Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bingley: Emerald, 31, 36997.
  • Kovacs, B. and Hannan, M. T. (2010). ‘The consequences of category spanning depend on contrast’. In Hsu, G., Kocak, O. and Negro, G. (Eds), Categories in Markets: Origins and Evolution. Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bingley: Emerald, 31, 175201.
  • Lamont, M. and Molnar, V. (2002). ‘The study of boundaries in the social sciences’. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 16795.
  • Marquis, C. and Lounsbury, M. (2007). ‘Vive la resistance: competing logics and the consolidation of US community banking’. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 799820.
  • Meyer, J. W. and Rowan, B. (1977). ‘Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myths and ceremony’. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 34063.
  • Meyers-Levy, J. and Tybout, A. M. (1989). ‘Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation’. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 3954.
  • Murphy, G. L. (2002). The Big Book of Concepts. Boston, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Murphy, G. L. and Medin, D. L. (1985). ‘The role of theories in conceptual coherence’. Psychological Review, 92, 289316.
  • Negro, G., Hannan, M. T. and Rao, H. (2010a). ‘Categorical contrast and audience appeal: niche width and critical success in winemaking’. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19, 1397425.
  • Negro, G., Kocak, O. and Hsu, G. (2010b). ‘Research on categories in the sociology of organizations’. In Hsu, G., Kocak, O. and Negro, G. (Eds), Categories in Markets: Origins and Evolution. Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bingley: Emerald, 31, 335.
  • Negro, G., Hannan, M. T. and Rao, H. (2011). ‘Category reinterpretation and defection: modernism and tradition in Italian wine making’. Organization Science, 22, 144963.
  • Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Peterson, R. A. and Kern, R. M. (1996). ‘Changing highbrow taste: from snob to omnivore’. American Sociological Review, 61, 9007.
  • Polos, L., Hannan, M. T. and Carroll, G. R. (2002). ‘Foundations of a theory of social forms’. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 85115.
  • Pontikes, E. G. (2009). ‘Two sides of the same coin: how category leniency affects multiple audience evaluations’. Working Paper, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Chicago, IL.
  • Porac, J. F., Thomas, H. and Badenfuller, C. (1989). ‘Competitive groups as cognitive communities: the case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers’. Journal of Management Studies, 26, 397416.
  • Porac, J. F., Thomas, H., Wilson, F., Paton, D. and Kanfer, A. (1995). ‘Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 20327.
  • Porac, J. F., Thomas, H. and Baden-Fuller, C. (2011). ‘Competitive groups as cognitive communities: the case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers revisited’. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 64664.
  • Quine, W. V. (1951). ‘Main trends in recent philosophy: two dogmas of empiricism’. The Philosophical Review, 60, 2043.
  • Rao, H., Monin, P. and Durand, R. (2005). ‘Border crossing: bricolage and the erosion of categorical boundaries in French gastronomy’. American Sociological Review, 70, 96891.
  • Ratneshwar, S., Barsalou, L. W., Pechmann, C. and Moore, M. (2001). ‘Goal-derived categories: the role of personal and situational goals in category representations’. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10, 14757.
  • Rehder, B. (2003a). ‘Categorization as causal reasoning’. Cognitive Science, 27, 70948.
  • Rehder, B. (2003b). ‘A causal-model theory of conceptual representation and categorization’. Journal of Experimental Psychology – Learning Memory and Cognition, 29, 114159.
  • Rehder, B. and Hastie, R. (2001). ‘Causal knowledge and categories: the effects of causal beliefs on categorization, induction, and similarity’. Journal of Experimental Psychology – General, 130, 32360.
  • Rindova, V. P. and Fombrun, C. J. (1999). ‘Constructing competitive advantage: the role of firm-constituent interactions’. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 691710.
  • Rindova, V. P., Becerra, M. and Contardo, I. (2004). ‘Enacting competitive wars: competitive activity, language games, and market consequences’. Academy of Management Review, 29, 67086.
  • Rindova, V. P., Dalpiaz, E. and Ravasi, D. (2011). ‘A cultural quest: a study of organizational use of new cultural resources in strategy formation’. Organization Science, 22, 41331.
  • Rosa, J. A., Porac, J. F., Runser-Spanjol, J. and Saxon, M. S. (1999). ‘Sociocognitive dynamics in a product market’. Journal of Marketing, 63, 6477.
  • Rosch, E. (1973). ‘Natural categories’. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 32850.
  • Rosch, E. (1975). ‘Cognitive representations of semantic categories’. Journal of Experimental Psychology – General, 104, 192233.
  • Rosch, E. and Mervis, C. B. (1975). ‘Family resemblances: studies in internal structure of categories’. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573605.
  • Rosch, E., Simpson, C. and Miller, R. S. (1976). ‘Structural bases of typicality effects’. Journal of Experimental Psychology – Human Perception and Performance, 2, 491502.
  • Ruef, M. and Patterson, K. (2009). ‘Credit and classification: the impact of industry boundaries in nineteenth-century America’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54, 486520.
  • Sauder, M. (2008). ‘Interlopers and field change: the entry of US News into the field of legal education’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 20934.
  • Schneiberg, M. and Berk, G. (2010). ‘From categorical imperative to learning by categories: cost accounting and new categorical practices in American manufacturing, 1900–1930’. In Hsu, G., Kocak, O. and Negro, G. (Eds), Categories in Markets: Origins and Evolution. Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bingley: Emerald, 31, 25592.
  • Scott, S. G. and Lane, V. R. (2000). ‘A stakeholder approach to organizational identity’. Academy of Management Review, 25, 4362.
  • Shrum, W. (1991). ‘Critics and publics: cultural mediation in highbrow and popular performing arts’. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 34775.
  • Tetlock, P. E. (2000). ‘Cognitive biases and organizational correctives: do both disease and cure depend on the politics of the beholder?’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 293326.
  • Thornton, P. H. and Ocasio, W. (1999). ‘Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990’. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 80143.
  • Tolbert, P. S. and Zucker, L. G. (1997). 'The Institutionalization of Institutional Theory. London: Sage.
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. New York: Macmillan.
  • Zuckerman, E. W. (1999). ‘The categorical imperative: securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount’. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1398438.
  • Zuckerman, E. W. (2000). ‘Focusing the corporate product: securities analysts and de-diversification’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 591619.
  • Zuckerman, E. W., Kim, T.-Y., Ukanwa, K. and Rittmann, J. V. (2003). ‘Robust identities or nonentities? Typecasting in the feature-film labor market’. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 101874.