SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    ROBERT A. ACKERMAN, DEBORAH A. KASHY, CONRAD A. CORRETTI, A tutorial on analyzing data from speed-dating studies with heterosexual dyads, Personal Relationships, 2015, 22, 1
  2. 2
    Renske Keizer, Aafke Komter, Are “Equals” Happier Than “Less Equals”? A Couple Analysis of Similarity and Well-being, Journal of Marriage and Family, 2015, 77, 4
  3. 3
    Julia E. Mackaronis, Donald S. Strassberg, Jeanne M. Cundiff, Deanna J. Cann, Beholder and Beheld: A Multilevel Model of Perceived Sexual Appeal, Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2015,

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Darren George, Shanhong Lou, Jared Webb, Jennifer Pugh, Alan Martinez, Jeremy Foulston, Couple similarity on stimulus characteristics and marital satisfaction, Personality and Individual Differences, 2015, 86, 126

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Philip Janz, Christopher A. Pepping, W. Kim Halford, Individual differences in dispositional mindfulness and initial romantic attraction: A speed dating experiment, Personality and Individual Differences, 2015, 82, 14

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Heidi R. Riggio, P. Priscilla Lui, Amber L. Garcia, Brigitte K. Matthies, Gar Culbert, Jessica Bailey, Initial validation of a self-report measure of perceptions of interpersonal attraction, Personality and Individual Differences, 2015, 74, 292

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    J. H. Lundquist, K.-H. Lin, Is Love (Color) Blind? The Economy of Race among Gay and Straight Daters, Social Forces, 2015, 93, 4, 1423

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    CLAUDIA CHLOE BRUMBAUGH, ALISON BAREN, PERYL AGISHTEIN, Attraction to attachment insecurity: Flattery, appearance, and status's role in mate preferences, Personal Relationships, 2014, 21, 2
  9. 9
    Andrew Dix, A New Era of Courtship: Let me Contemplate our Speed-Date to Determine the Interconnectedness of Conversation and Physical Attraction, Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 2013, 7, 2, 246

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Natasha D. Tidwell, Paul W. Eastwick, Eli J. Finkel, Perceived, not actual, similarity predicts initial attraction in a live romantic context: Evidence from the speed-dating paradigm, Personal Relationships, 2013, 20, 2
  11. 11
    Gert Stulp, Abraham P. Buunk, Robert Kurzban, Simon Verhulst, The height of choosiness: mutual mate choice for stature results in suboptimal pair formation for both sexes, Animal Behaviour, 2013, 86, 1, 37

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Carin Perilloux, Jaime M. Cloud, David M. Buss, Women’s physical attractiveness and short-term mating strategies, Personality and Individual Differences, 2013, 54, 4, 490

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    D.A. Frederick, T.A. Reynolds, M.R. Fales, J.R. Garcia, Encyclopedia of Body Image and Human Appearance, 2012,

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Jens B. Asendorpf, Lars Penke, Mitja D. Back, From dating to mating and relating: Predictors of initial and long-term outcomes of speed-dating in a community sample, European Journal of Personality, 2011, 25, 1
  15. 15
    Elizabeth Aura McClintock, Handsome Wants as Handsome Does: Physical Attractiveness and Gender Differences in Revealed Sexual Preferences, Biodemography and Social Biology, 2011, 57, 2, 221

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Krzysztof Kościński, How do pairs matched in physical attractiveness form if people are unaware of their own attractiveness?, Anthropological Review, 2011, 74, 1

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Mitja D. Back, Lars Penke, Stefan C. Schmukle, Karoline Sachse, Peter Borkenau, Jens B. Asendorpf, Why mate choices are not as reciprocal as we assume: The role of personality, flirting and physical attractiveness, European Journal of Personality, 2011, 25, 2
  18. 18
    Elizabeth Stokoe, “Have You Been Married, or …?”: Eliciting and Accounting for Relationship Histories in Speed-Dating Interaction, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 2010, 43, 3, 260

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    David Dryden Henningsen, Mary Lynn Miller Henningsen, Testing Error Management Theory: Exploring the Commitment Skepticism Bias and the Sexual Overperception Bias, Human Communication Research, 2010, 36, 4